Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka societies registration act 1960 section 15 suits by and against society Court: chennai Page 3 of about 32 results (0.065 seconds)

M. Sekar and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

..... counter, wherein, he has stated that the petitioners are all working in district supply and marketing society (dsms), which is a society registered under the tamil nadu societies registration act, 1975. nextly, he has stated that the district supply and marketing society under development of women and children in rural areas, which is not a part of the government ..... the tribunal." ... 25. the learned government advocate appearing for the respondents would now contend that in the decision of the honourable supreme court reported in (state of karnataka vs. uma devi) (2006) 4 scc 1, it was held that contract employees are not eligible to seek permanent absorption. this is not a case where ..... behalf of the respondents, would rely on the judgment of the hon'ble apex court reported in (2006) 4 supreme court cases 1, secretary, state of karnataka v. uma devi, wherein, the hon'ble apex court has laid down the parameters for consideration of regularization of the employees. in the said judgment, the .....

K. Ramanathan and Others Vs. the Secretary to Government, School Educa ...

Court : Chennai

..... the sarva shiksha abhiyan is a time bound project for universal elementary education implemented through tamil nadu state mission of education for all, which is a society registered under tamil nadu societies registration act 1975. as per the guidelines of the government of india, the objectives of the project was to be completed by 31.03.2010 and thereafter ..... , the society has to be wound up. funds for the scheme was provided by the government of india and government of tamil nadu as grants ..... constitution, the petitioners cannot seek for any permanent status with scale of pay. it has been held by the supreme court vide its judgment in secretary, state of karnataka and others v. umadevi (3) and othersreported in (2006) 4 scc 1that regularisation is not a source of recruitment. 6. the learned counsel for the .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Dinesh K. Shah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1997]223ITR68(Mad)

..... only public or private limited companies registered under the indian companies act, but also statutory corporations, partnership-firm or any society registered under the societies registration act or any state societies registration act.45. in interpreting similar provisions in the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, the supreme court in the decision in rajasthan pharmaceutical laboratory v. state of karnataka, : 1981crilj348 , has held that the directors who are not directly in ..... charge of the management of the company cannot be held liable.46. in this context, we may also beneficially refer to section 10 of the essential commodities act, 1955. section 10 of the said act contains similar provisions to section 86a(1) of .....

income Tax Officer and anr. Vs. Dinesh K. Shah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)138CTR(Mad)297

..... only public or private limited companies registered under the indian companies act, but also statutory corporations, partnership firm or any society registered under the societies registration act or any state societies registration act.42. in interpreting similar provisions in drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, the supreme court in the decision reported in rajasthan pharmaceutical laboratory vs. state of karnataka : 1981crilj348 , has held that the director who are not directly in ..... charge of the management of the company cannot be held liable.43. in this context, we may also beneficially refer to s. 10 of the essential commodities act, 1955. sec. 10 of the said act contains similar provisions to s. 86a(1) of .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Arihant Trust and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)127CTR(Mad)448; [1995]214ITR306(Mad)

..... : [1992]194itr287(kar) , wherein the karnataka high court has held that the term 'individual' in section 3 of the wealth-tax act of 1957 will not bring within its compass an association of persons or body of individuals such as a club registered under the provisions of the societies registration act and, therefore, the assessee, an association of ..... members, running a club is not an individual falling within the scope of section 3 of the act. it is true that every trust cannot be treated as an individual for the ..... purposes. learned counsel mr. ramasamy, referred to the decision in c. arunachalam v. cit : [1985]151itr172(kar) , wherein the karnataka high court, while referring to section 61(1) of the act, has held that the partner of a partnership in his representative capacity cannot be an individual and a karta of a hindu undivided .....

The Indian Cultural Research Trust, Rep by its Secretary, Chennai and ...

Court : Chennai

..... an admitted fact that both the indian cultural research trust and the wellington charitable trust were registered under the tamil nadu societies registration act, 1975 [hereinafter called as the 'act'] and as mandated under section 6 of the act, the memorandum and the bye-laws of the trust were filed before the registrar. it is also admitted that on ..... set aside and hereby set aside. 50. mr.ar.l.sundaresan, learned senior counsel relied upon the decision reported in (2004) 2 supreme court caes 783, karnataka rare earth and another v. senior geologist, department of mines and geology and another, wherein it was held that the advantage gained by party relying on interim ..... m/s.sbec projects private limited v. bgr energy systemts limited] the decision of the hon'ble apex court reported in (2004) 2 supreme court cases 783, karnataka rare earth and another v. senior geologist, department of mines and geology and another has been followed. 53. there is no quarrel over the propositions laid down .....

K. Bhaskar and Others Vs. R. Thiyagarajan and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... 2004 (7) scc 112 (a.umarani vs. registrar,co-op. societies); (g) air 2006 sc 1806 (secretary, state of karnataka vs. umadevi); (h) w.p.no.211 of 2016, dated 20.07.2016 (madras high court) (deepti ahuja vs. the chief controlling revenue authority-cum-inspector general of registration and others); (i) 1993 supp (3) scc 575 (syed ..... . state of gujarat): "6. the constitutional perspective must be clear in unlocking the mystique of 'void' and 'voidable' vis-a-vis orders under the act. the act is a constraint on a fundamental right and so the scheme of article 19 must be vividly before our minds if extraordinary controls over human rights statutorily vested ..... issue clearly:-- "how does the validity or nullity of the decision affect the rights and liabilities of the persons concerned? can the persons affected by an illegal act ignore and disregard it with impunity? what are the remedies available to the aggrieved parties? when will the courts recognize a right to compensation for damage occasioned .....

The District Registrar, Tirunelveli and Others Vs. R. Chidambara Raja ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... whatsoever conducted before such impugned order was passed. in the absence of inquiry, the order is also opposed to section 33-a of the indian stamp act, 1899 and section 80-a of the registration act, 1908. 20. the special government pleader has placed reliance upon the judgment dated 02.04.2014 made in w.a.no.422 of 2014 [dr ..... 9 and others [2008 -3-l.w.286], the scope of section 47-(a) (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and sections 2(12), 17, 31, 33-a of the registration act, 1908 as well as certain provisions of the tamil nadu (prevention of under valuation of instruments) rules, 1968 came up for consideration and it has been held that the procedure ..... endorsement in the instrument that proceedings under section 47-a of the indian stamp act is pending and release the document to the party. this will safeguard the interest of revenue. (iii) in 2005 (12) scc 483 [i.i.s. employees' house building coop. society ltd., vs. state of karnataka and others] and 2006 (3) mlj 389 [savithiriammal vs. state of .....

K. Nithiyanantham Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to Gov ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(1)CTC1; [2007(1)JCR423(Mad)]; (2006)1MLJ1

..... -economic needs. 34. as per section 2 (16), 'member' means a person joining in the application for the registration of a society and a person admitted to the membership after registration in accordance with the provisions of this act, the rules and the by-laws and includes an associate member.35. section 2 (19) defines 'officer', and ..... endorsing the view of the shantaraj's case and held that the administrative officer or special officer, either under the karnataka act or under the kerala act, cannot have powers to enrol new members in the co-operative society.20. in the light of the above legal and factual background, the question raised in this matter is, whether ..... portion of the paragraph 7 of the kuttappan's case, it is clear that the supreme court has not merely interpreted the provisions of the kerala act and karnataka act, but also declared a law giving out the ratio decidendi that the enrolment of new members by the administrator or the special officer would involve alteration .....

AllIndia Gen Ins Obc Employees Welfare Assn Vs. United India Insurance ...

Court : Chennai

..... tamil nadu societies registration act is enacted to replace the societies registration act, 1860. the societies registration act insofar as it applies to the state of tamil nadu has been repealed by section 57 of the tamil nadu societies registration act. hence, the petitioner society cannot masquerade itself as a trade union. section 57 of the tamil nadu societies registration act, 1975 reads as follows : "57.repeals and savings.-(1)the societies registration act, 1860 (central act xxi of 1860 ..... as follows : [(qq) "trade union" means a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 (16 of 1926);]" 17.the question whether such an unregistered union can masquerade as a trade union came to be considered by the supreme court vide judgment in b.srinivasa reddy v. karnataka urban water supply & drainage board employees' assn., reported in (2006) 11 scc 73 .....