Karnataka Silkworm Seed Cocoon And Silk Yarn Regulation Of Production Supply Distribution And Sale Act 1959 Section 14 - Judgment Search Results

State of Karnataka Vs. Abdul Jaleel

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1205; 1985(2)KarLJ474

realers the assistant director enforcement department of sericulture government of karnataka bangalore on verification of the accounts of the respondents found petition against the order of the sessions judge a karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution against the order of the sessions judge a karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and the order of the sessions judge a karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale silk exchange in violation of section 8a of the karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution section 8a of the karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1959 for section 13 3 of karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1969 revisable section the karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1959 for short the act karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1959 for short the act and silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1959 karnataka act no 5 of 1960 seed cocoon and yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1969 revisable section 42 proviso sugarcane control order 1966 as persona designata being a statutory authority constituted under the act to dispose of appeals arising thereunder and since the order silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1959 karnataka act no 5 of 1960 section 13 3 sessions statutory order made in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the essential commodities act 1955 investing the central corporation indore 1977 2scr871 a contention was raised under section 149 of the madhya pradesh municipal corporation act 1956 that as

State of Karnataka and anr. Vs. Thimmappa H.S. and Etc.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1984KAR933

..... were heard on this aspect 6 a few facts a under the karnataka silkworm seed cocoon and silk yarn regulation of production supply distribution and sale act 1959 the act the director of sericulture a statutory authority is conferred with the ..... under s 482 of the code accordingly these petitions are dismissed in limine 14 petitions dismissed sections 7 13 1 d a s pachhapure j demand and acceptance of .....

H.N. Nanje Gowda Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR1649; 1996(3)KarLJ39

property declaration of industrial area under section 28 of the karnataka industrial areas development act 1966 consequences of section 28 clearly decision the supreme court was examining the validity of karnataka silkworm seeds cocoons regulation of production supply and distribution amendment act the supreme court was examining the validity of karnataka silkworm seeds cocoons regulation of production supply and distribution amendment act 1979 supreme court was examining the validity of karnataka silkworm seeds cocoons regulation of production supply and distribution amendment act 1979 act 52 of list i and section 2 of the central silk board act it was held therein that an industry comprises court was examining the validity of karnataka silkworm seeds cocoons regulation of production supply and distribution amendment act 1979 act 33 of the products of industry it is not merely the production that matters marketing thereto is an important feature therefore it the validity of karnataka silkworm seeds cocoons regulation of production supply and distribution amendment act 1979 act 33 79 in that of karnataka silkworm seeds cocoons regulation of production supply and distribution amendment act 1979 act 33 79 in that context considering 8 848 acres a notification under section 28 of the act has been issued in respect of recommendation for acquisition of 6 1994 the first respondent had issued a notification under section 3 1 of the act declaring the area consisting of land out of which it is stated that 2 787 14 acres were government land and the balance is private land

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Agricultural P ...

Court : Patna

..... section 2 of the central silk board act in terms of entry 52 of list i was under consideration in that case the validity of the provisions of mysore silkworm seed and cocoon regulation of production supply and distribution act 1959 ..... karnataka high court and held that the control of the industry vested in parliament was only restricted to the aspect of production and manufacture of silk yarn or silk .....

B. Viswanathiah and Company and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1991(1)SC386; 1991(1)SCALE174; (1991)3SCC358; [1991]1SCR305; 1991(2)LC3(SC)

..... silkworm seed and cocoon regulation of production supply and distributions act 1959 act no 5 of 1960 hereinafter referred to as the impugned act the challenge was repelled by the karnataka ..... sale or purchase of silk yarn in a silk exchange should be by weight by open auction and in cash section 8a placed certain restrictions on reelers twisters and traders after the establishment of a silk ..... acts 14 .....

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Sri Chamundeswari Sugar Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2008(6)SC69; 2008(7)SCALE62; (2008)7SCC469; (2008)14VST355(SC); 2008AIRSCW4462

by the central government sap fixed by the state of karnataka and all other amounts paid to sugarcane growers by the effect of the 1966 control order and the bihar sugarcane regulation of supply and purchase act 1981 it was clearly ruled are all within the realm of planning economic needs ensuring production and distribution of essential commodities and basic necessities of community the 1966 control order and the bihar sugarcane regulation of supply and purchase act 1981 it was clearly ruled that the it was held that statutory orders regulating the supply and distribution of goods by and between the parties under the control as purchase it is not possible to conceive of a sale of goods without a buyer 18 it is fairly accepted under the u p sugarcane regulation of supply and purchase act 1953 the third is the price paid at the end entry 54 list ii having regard to gannon dunkerley case 1959 1scr379 the contention was repelled after a thorough analysis of transferee purchases the share of each of his brothers thus section 54 clause i is attracted 16 normal meaning of the or mistake his consent is free as defined in section 14 of the indian contract act though he is obliged by

Ram Chandra Kasliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1788; 2004(4)WLC17

filed again in indian aluminium co ltd and anr v karnataka electricity board and ors it was held as follows we part of the tradition of the pink city which has seeds in history jaipur being the capital of the state is their screening in such manner as may be determined by regulations absorb them in the service of the authority on such spaces parks recreational grounds play grounds water gas and electric supply and sources of energy street lighting sewerage drainage conservancy public the other hand the essential characteristic of federalism is the distribution of limited executive legislative and judicial authority among bodies which in section 21 and 22 ii acquisition development reservation and sale or leasing of land for purpose of public utilities such of india read with section 82 of the rajasthan municipalities act 1959 hereinafter to be referred as the rm act to 1 notwithstanding anything contained in the rajasthan urban improvement act 1959 raj act 35 of 1959 hereinafter referred to as the is acquired in the present proceedings attracts the provisions of section 49 1 again in deep chand and ors v land play grounds 13 promotion of cultural educational and aesthetic aspects 14 burials and burial grounds cremations cremation grounds and electric crematoriums

K. Mohan and Co. (Exports) Vs. M.H. Vatnani, Assistant Commissioner of ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2002]126STC126(Bom)

was of the opinion that the deduction of high seas sales given under section 5 2 of the cst act 1956 and therefore under section 35 1 b of the bst act 1959 the burden was upon the respondents to establish that issued under section 35 of the bombay sales tax act 1959 hereinafter referred to as the bst act for short wherein the cst act since the conditions precedent set out in section 35 1 b of the bst act 1959 are not under section 35 1 b of the bst act 1959 14 in the premises aforesaid rule is made absolute in terms

Bharti Airtel Ltd. (Formerly Bharti Tele Ventures Ltd.) Rep. by Its He ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2009)22VST465(Karn); 2009(3)AIRKarR235(D.B)

energy could be brought to tax by die government of karnataka under the provisions of kvat act as is done by through ofc network and the direction of their movement is regulated further it is an undisputed tact that this light energy supply of instruments and accompaniment on the one hand and supply of telegraphic line connection on the other to name the materials commodities and articles further section 2 7 of the sale of goods act 1930 defines goods as meaning every kind of service to its subscribers etc and therefore the service activities of the appellant company cannot be held to be sale meaning of article 366 12 of the constitution of india section 2 15 of the kvat act 2003 and also section place to another is patently illegal and without any authority 14 sri v sridaran the learned counsel for the appellant company

Prakash Chaturvedi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2424; 2006(4)WLC515

been reiterated by the apex court recently in state of karnataka v c lalitha 2006 2 scc 747 in fact there body contravenes the provisions of this act or statues ordinances regulations or rules made thereunder 3 income from endowment fund may are primarily research oriented higher education is just a by product iii u s a out of 2364 universities 1752 are 63 64 65 and 66 of list i the impugned act provides for effective mechanism ensuring coordination and determination of standards registered under the1 o 195 i rajasthan public trusts act 1959 act c statute means a statute of the uni no government b the extent and the status of the uni section 4 submission of proposal forversity and the availability of land not be withdrawn without the permission of the state government 14 before we proceed to deal with two enactments referred to