Karnataka Sales Tax Act 1957 Section 25a - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka sales tax act 1957 section 25a Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 506 results (2.006 seconds)T.V. Nagaraj Vs. B. Anjanappa
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : May-30-2000
Reported in : 2000(4)KarLJ518
the said amount shall be refunded to the petitioner accused karnataka sales tax act 1957 sections 13 15 d v shylendra which if had been charged with the liability such as sales tax liability of the erstwhile owners and if he is to operate on all the properties of the purchaser sales tax department is not entitled to attach the bank accounts of an offence punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act 1881 by the petitioner accused the petitioner accused was proceeded be refunded to the petitioner accused karnataka sales tax act 1957 sections 13 15 d v shylendra kumar j liability property c after obtaining special leave under sub section 4 of section 378 of the cr p c an appeal thus layagainst
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Parvathi and ors. Vs. R. Pandurangasetty and anr.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-25-2000
Reported in : 2001ACJ508
the rate of 9 per cent per annum as above karnataka sales tax act 1957 appeal d v shylendra kumar j rate of 9 per cent per annum as above karnataka sales tax act 1957 appeal d v shylendra kumar j requirement of 9 per cent per annum as above karnataka sales tax act 1957 appeal d v shylendra kumar j requirement as as well as per indications from the provision of interest act 1978 and the various decisions of the supreme court and per cent per annum as above karnataka sales tax act 1957 appeal d v shylendra kumar j requirement as to deposit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyndicate Bank Vs. the General Secretary, Syndicate Bank Stff Associat ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-25-2000
Reported in : AIR2000SC2198; [2000(85)FLR807]; JT2000(5)SC243; (2000)ILLJ1630SC; 2000(4)SCALE59; (2000)5SCC65; (2000)2UPLBEC1618
article 226 of the constitution in the high court of karnataka which as noted above was dismissed by the learned single however there shall be no order as to costs karnataka sales tax act 1957 section 13 3 b b n agrawal in the matter of recovery of the dues of sales tax etc however no such provision has been incorporated in either the situation is well recognised and 3 the management should act in good faith which means that the action of the 2 of the mines and minerals regulation and development act 1957 section 30 of the gift tax act and section 529 compensation act 1923 section 11 2 of the epf act section 74 1 of the estate duty act 1953 section 25
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDena Bank Vs. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh and Co. and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-25-2000
Reported in : AIR2000SC3654; [2001]107CompCas157(SC); 2000(4)CTC170; (2001)166CTR(SC)86; [2001]247ITR165(SC); JT2000(5)SC307; 2000(4)SCALE125; (2000)5SCC694; [2000]120STC610(SC)
by the learned counsel for the appellant that under the karnataka land revenue act as also under the karnataka sales tax that sub section 2a of section 15 of the karnataka sales tax act is being given retrospective operation determining the obligation which was assessed as a legal entity the arrears of tax could be recovered from the assets of the partnership firm specific provision as found in section 18 of the bombay act the partners of the firm cannot be held liable for of section 15 2a of the karnataka sales tax act 1957 21 the learned counsel for the appellant is right in of aurangabad v central bank of india the effect of section 190 is to make the procedure for recovery of arrears
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElgi Tyres and Tread Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-12-2000
Reported in : [2000]120STC261(Kar)
established that the property was transferred in the state of karnataka the retreading was done on the tyres of andhra pradesh contract which is not liable to tax under the central sales tax act and on which the provision of the karnataka that the inter state transaction would not be subjected to tax under the karnataka sales tax act 5 the main stress the state under section 5b of the karnataka sales tax act 1957 read with entry 24 of the sixth schedule to of the sixth schedule to the karnataka sales tax act 1957 read with section 5b thereof since the contract itself contemplated reproduces the provisions contained in the main part of sub section 2 of section 4 of the central sales tax act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation Ltd. ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-07-2000
Reported in : [2001]105CompCas416(Kar); ILR2000KAR3399
compliance with the said notice under section 14 of the karnataka sales tax act ksiidc as directed should immediately bring the transferee purchaser on the other section 15 of the karnataka sales tax act would very much come into play at that act charge is created in respect of the arrears of tax same should get precedence he accordingly overruled the objections of under section 13 3 b of the karnataka sales tax act 1957 the kst act for short the learned magistrate issued section 13 3 b of the karnataka sales tax act 1957 the kst act for short the learned magistrate issued fine clear at the outset the recovery under the said sub section 3 would be without prejudice to any other mode of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBellary Steels and Alloys Ltd. and ors. and Escorts Mahle Ltd. Vs. Sta ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-18-2000
Reported in : ILR2001KAR805; [2001]123STC189(Kar)
dated november 18 1999 escorts mahle limited v state of karnataka the appeals are taken up together for disposal as some first schedule the constitutional provision authorises levy of tax on sales as well as purchases section 7 3 provides that if character of the tax or duty from impermissible to permissible tax but the tax or levy should answer such character and and therefore the deemed assent given by the president to act no 8 of 1993 would be deemed to have lapsed the karnataka sales tax act 1957 karnataka act 25 of 1957 with effect from april 1 1994 the change was brought january 6 1998 such a notification cannot be traced to section 3 1 of the act for the reason that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBijapur Co-operative Spinning Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
Decided on : Jun-07-2000
Reported in : (2001)123STC266Tribunal
confused with the assessment being made against the principal at karnataka 6 it is not necessary for us to go into f to enable the karnataka mill to claim exemption from sales tax but the agent did not render accounts for the made against the agent and he failed to pay the tax it might have been open to the authorities to recover concerned with the question whether for the subject transactions who actually is the dealer liable to file returns and pay tax argument was rejected in the said karnataka sales tax act 1957 section 11 says that an agent is made liable to commission remuneration or other valuable consideration sub clause iii of section 2 g ropes in the agents also to be dealers
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTE.i.D. Parry (India) Limited and Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
Decided on : Jan-24-2000
Reported in : (2000)118STC436Tribunal
in the case of jyothi home industries v state of karnataka a legislature which could enact a law with retrospective effect the purchaser is liable to pay purchase tax under the sales tax act on the amount paid by the purchaser to to retain the amount wrongfully and illegally collected as sales tax and this object has been sought to be achieved by was published in government gazette on june 17 1999 the act no 27 of 1999 reads as follows be it enacted about to i amend the provisions of the act particularly section 2 r or section 2 q etc to enable a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Kothari Industrial Corpn.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-09-2000
Reported in : AIR2001Kant101
on an application under rule 38 5 a section 69 karnataka co operative societies rules 1960 rule 38 5 d v item no 21 of the i schedule to tamilnadu general sales tax act 1959 item no 21 of the i schedule 30 7 1992 to subject the said materials to entry tax manufacture of an intermediate or finished product is necessary only kstact and kteg act the respondent is engaged in the activity of mixing fertilizers and swelling fertilizer mixtures 2 the respondent respondent is an assessee under the karnataka sales tax act 1957 for short kstact and kteg act the respondent is engaged of the objections raised on behalf of the auction purchaser section 69 karnataka co operative societies rules 1960 rule 38 5
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT