Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 402 results (0.159 seconds)

Nallajerla Murali Krishna @ Mura Vs. the State of Telangana, Through P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... and as triable by magistrate that was upheld as prevailing by the bench of the calcutta high court referring to article 254 holding earlier state amendment is impliedly repealed by later central amendment that shall prevail. the apex court confirmed said conclusion.9. having regard to the above, the law is crystal clear that in case ..... provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter in including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state. article 246(2) speaks that notwithstanding anything in clause (3) (state list), parliament, and, subject ..... vs. state of kerala , zameer alr shaik vs. state of maharastra , manoj yadav vs. pushpa , k.t. plantation pvt. ltd. and another vs. state of karnataka , leave about the other expressions with reference to article 245 clause (2), article 251 and article 254 where it was held that even prevails from assent of the president .....

Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural Universi Vs. M. Devender Reddy and Oth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... of anything previously done under the statute." a combined reading of the above extracted provisions makes it clear that the board of management of the university may amend or repeal any statute including first statutes subject to prior approval of the government, and any such modification in the statute shall have effect only when it is ..... of the government, the board may, from time to time, make any statute in addition to the first statutes referred to in sub- section (1), and may amend or repeal any statute in the manner hereinafter provided in this section." sub-section (6) of section 39 is as follows: "(6) every first statute made under sub-section ..... eligible persons and eliminates favouritism and brings transparency to the selection process and such procedure is the constitutional mandate as held by the supreme court in state of karnataka v. umadevi (3)13.9. sri j.ramachandra rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in pil no.387 of 2012, raised almost similar contentions as .....

itc Limited Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)26VST682(AP)

..... courts/tribunals to apply the law laid down by the supreme court only from the date on which the judgment came to be passed m.a. murthy v. state of karnataka : [2003]264itr1(sc) ; g. raja babu v. the govt. of a.p. : 2007(4)ald105 .13. it is not even the case of the respondents, in the counter ..... of a statute has the effect of ignoring or disregarding it so far as the determination of the rights of private parties is concerned. the court does not annul or repeal the statute if it finds it in conflict with the constitution. it simply refuses to recognize it, and determines the rights of the parties just as if such statute ..... sales tax appellate tribunal, that the petitioner had not challenged the validity of the order of the sales tax appellate tribunal before this court prior to the filing of the amendment petition in the present writ petition and, as the order in revision had attained finality, notwithstanding the act having been set aside and declared unconstitutional by the supreme court .....

N. Jangi Reddy and ors. Vs. Yellaram Narsimha Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD39; 2008(4)ALT567

..... the family along with the other coparceners. no doubt, while amending section 6, the enactments made by the states of andhra pradesh, tamil nadu, karnataka and maharashtra were not repealed. in other words, the central amending act did not repeal section 29-a of the state amendment.the learned counsel for the appellant contended that section 29-a ..... of a.p. amendment starts with a non-obstante clause which commences with the words ..... nothing in this clause shall prevent parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state.whenever a statute comes up for consideration, the judge has to necessarily find out the .....

Ramvilas Bajaj Vs. Ashok Kumar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALD137; 2007(4)ALT348; AIR2007NOC2064(FB)(AP)

..... on the provisions of the respective acts which were made applicable for the first time to the pending cases and none of these cases involve repeal or substitution of a provision by way of amendment. the ratio of these cases is therefore not attracted to the present batch of cases under consideration.51. sri vilas afzalpurkar also placed reliance ..... us.52. similar is the case in h. shiva rao's case (supra). with the inclusion of the village concerned within the limits of the cities under the karnataka municipal corporation act, the provisions of the rent control act were made applicable to property in question. by that time the landlord's suit for recovery of possession was ..... of any premises shall be made by any court or other authority in favour of the landlord against the tenant. the prohibition, in section 21(1) of the karnataka rent control act, was against the making of an order or decree for recovery of possession and not for the execution of a decree as is prescribed in section .....

Damalanka Gangaraju and ors. Vs. Nandipati Vijaya Lakshmi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALD694

..... in the family along with the other coparceners. no doubt, while amending section 6, the enactments made by the states of andhra pradesh, tamil nadu, karnataka and maharashtra were not repealed. in other words, the central amending act did not repeal section 29-a of the state amendment.37. the learned counsel for the appellant contended that section 29 ..... -a of a.p. amendment starts with a non-obstante clause which commences with the ..... nothing in this clause shall prevent parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state.38. whenever a statute comes up for consideration, the judge has to necessarily find out .....

Syed MunavvaruddIn Quadri Vs. Chief Executive Officer, A.P. State Wakf ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD711; 2007(4)ALT192

..... operation of corresponding law and subject thereto anything contain or any action taken in exercise of the powers under corresponding law shall be deemed to have been done under the repealing act. the bye-laws if any made by the wakf board under 1954 act are not saved.11. in the context, it is also necessary to examine the ..... that elections were conducted when 1954 act was in force, learned counsel for the petitioner did not file any bye-laws or circulars to that effect. the decision of karnataka high court in masjid-e-islammabad's case (supra), does not deal with the question that has fallen for consideration in the present case. furthermore section 112 of the ..... managing committee by the mussallies though such procedure was in vogue when wakf act, 1954 (1954 act) was the regulating law. he also submits that 1954 act has been repealed and the byelaws made thereunder have not been saved by section 112 of the wakf act, 1995. on merits, he submits that when there were two reports by the .....

Guddi Malkapur Co-op. Housing Society Vs. LA.O, Huda and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(1)ALD339; 2007(1)ALT547

..... taken up for hearing by a learned single judge of this court, learned counsel for the respondents relied upon the judgment of the supreme court in state of karnataka v. sangappa dyavappa biradar : air2005sc2204 , to justify the rejection of request of the petitioners for reference under section 18 of the land acquisition act, 1894 ( ..... we consider the submissions in the context of principles laid down in the judgments on which reliance is placed.14. in state of karnataka v. sangappa dyavapa biradar (supra), the state of karnataka intended to acquire the lands of respondents/claimants for the purpose of submergence and construction of canal for the upper krishna project. ..... (2) of that article, which dealt with compulsory acquisition of property, has been repealed. consequently sub-clause (f) of clause (1) of article 19, which guaranteed the right to acquire and hold property, has also been omitted by the same 44th amendment act, 1978. the result of these changes, in short, is that the right .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. P. Sujatha and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC495; 2006ACJ1799; 2005(4)ALD352; 2005(4)ALT264

..... view of constitutional mandate enshrined in directive principles of state policy, namely article 41 of the constitution, necessary amendments were made in partial repeal of the motor vehicles act, 1988 by omitting section 166.10. by making amendment to sections 158(6) and 166(4) the legislature has in fact done away with formal application and ..... subjected.11. in nagappa's case (supra), the apex court observed as follows:'moreover, from section 169 of the act and rules 253 and 254 of the karnataka motor vehicles rules, 1989, it is dear that order 6 rule 17 cpc is applicable to such proceedings. therefore, in an appropriate case, depending upon the ..... facts and the evidence on record and in the interest of justice, the court may permit amendment of claim petition so as to award enhanced compensation. form 63 of the karnataka motor vehicles rules, 1989, which is for filing an application for compensation, does not provide that the claimant should specify .....

Vallabhaneni Lakshmana Swamy and anr. Vs. Valluru Basavaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD807; 2004(5)ALT755

..... considered on its own facts and circumstances.68. there is yet another reason to hold that the amendment is not retrospective. the amendment is only a substitution of the value of the appeal. no specific repeal provisions were enacted. therefore, when substitution takes place it merely gets embebbed in section 9 and other ..... proceedings, it must indicate an express provision to that effect.19. in matters of substitution by an amendment, it has to be construed that there is no real distinction between the repeal and an amendment. whether a provision of an act is omitted by an act and the said act simultaneously re- ..... repeal and savings and which also makes provision for the new act being applicable to certain cases and proceedings, does not speak of the new act being applicable to the appeal or proceedings pending before the supreme court.56. in r. kapilnath v. krishna, : [2002]supp5scr66 , one of the contentions raised before the supreme court was that karnataka rent control (amendment .....