Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka repealing and amending act 2002 section 2 definitions Court: madhya pradesh Page 6 of about 89 results (0.137 seconds)

M/s. Technofab Engineering Limited and Others Vs. Bharat Heavy Electri ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... of the supreme court in para 15 onwards in the case of state of maharashtra vs. the central provinces manganese ore co. ltd. (air 1977 sc 879),the amended provision results in repeal and replacement of a legislative provision by a fresh enactment, as in this case. the same view has been taken in the case of zile singh vs. state ..... amount of the subject matter of suits and appeals without any prescription of upper limit in the concerned states (karnataka, rajasthan and maharashtra) enactments. the point no.(d) considered by the supreme court in this decision, as articulated in paragraph 31 of the judgment, is more or less ..... . 17. besides this decision, it may be useful to advert to another supreme court decision in the case of p.m. ashwathanarayana setty and others vs. state of karnataka and others7. in that case, the supreme court was called upon to consider the question about the legality of the levy of court fees ad valorem on the value or .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. P.N. Vijaiwargiya and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : I(1993)ACC254; 1992ACJ312

..... does not lay down the correct law. the division bench of kamataka high court in deputy general manager, k.s.r.t.c. v. jyoti constructions 1979 acj 426 (karnataka), has followed the madhya pradesh view enunciated in banwari lal's case, 1975 acj 40 (mp) and the view of punjab & haryana in several cases to the same ..... the proviso would not come into play. [see, chief secretary v. charles perea 1987 acj 446 (karnataka)].27. we answer the reference in the following terms:with effect from 2nd march, 1970, the date of coming into force of the motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1969 (act no. 56 of 1969), a claim for compensation suffered for damage caused ..... ' case, 1979 acj 426 (karnataka) and the other decision of the rajasthan high court taking the view that an owner of the property is entitled to claim for damages to property alone before the claims tribunal after 1969 amendment, the learned judge further added that the view taken stands fortified by further amendment introduced by act no. 47 of .....

Milan Supari Stores Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(1)MPLJ98; [2006]146STC360(MP)

..... 19(1) of the mpgst act, 1958 which reads as under:19. assessment of turnover escaping assessment.--(1) where an assessment has been made under this act or any act repealed by section 52 and if for any reason any sale or purchase of goods chargeable to tax under this act or any act ..... ) of section 27 of the madhya pradesh vanijyik kar adhiniyam, 1994 (no. 5 of 1995), the state government hereby makes the following amendments in this department notification no. a-3-76-2000-st-v(85) dated 20th december, 2000, namely: amendments.--in the said notification for the figures and words '30th april, 2001' the figures and word '31st may, 2001' shall be ..... repealed by section 52 during any period has been under-assessed or has escaped assessment or assessed at a lower rate or any deduction has been wrongly made therefrom, the commissioner .....

Ramchand Sharma and ors. Vs. Collector, Customs and Central Excise and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(33)LC95(MP)

..... , has to be granted to the person entitled to such benefit and the notification has to be acted upon in accordance with the wordings of the notification. the karnataka high court in indian sugars and refineries ltd., hospet v. union of india and ors. 1983 e.l.t. 209 has also held that if an expression ..... they are hdpe sacks woven on circular looms. as such, the benefit of exemption under the notification dated 3.4.1986 by the government of india as amended is not available to the petitioners. actually the respondents are wrongly interpreting the notification because the notification nowhere says that the hdpe woven sacks manufactured from the fabrics ..... a combination thereof, are manufactured on flat knitting looms. thereafter, the central government again issued a notification no. 3/87, c.e. dated 7.1.1987 further amending notifications dated 3.4.1986 and 20.11.1986, wherein it was provided that woven sacks of polymers of ethylene or propylene or a combination thereof were exempted falling .....

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)17VST353(MP)

..... ]3scr797 , indian oil corporation ltd. v. union of india : [1981]1scr673 , tan india ltd. v. stale of tamil nadu , gannon dunkerley & co. v. state of rajasthan : (1993)1scc364 , state of karnataka v. ece industries limited , desmet chemfood engg. pvt. ltd. bombay v. asstt. commissioner of sales tax [1999] 32 vkn 121 and pennwalt india ltd. v. divisional deputy commissioner [1999] 32 ..... '. the learned senior counsel would submit that no distinction is made between sales simpliciter and sales involved in course of execution of a works contract after the constitution (forty-sixth) amendment act, 1982 on general rules and its nature and effect should be carried towards its logical end.15. if the assessment order is tested on the decisions cited at the .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Prema Bai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ452

..... compensation.6. on the other hand, learned counsel for the claimants relied on the decisions of the supreme court in the cases of natwar parikh & co. ltd. v. state of karnataka 2006 acj 1 (sc); national insurance co. ltd. v. baljit kaur : air2004sc1340 ; full bench decision of this court in the case of jugal kishore v. ramlesh devi : 2003 ..... third party. relying the division bench decision of this court in the case of pushpa devi v. kamal singh : 2001(3)mplj548 , has held that while considering the amendment in the motor vehicles act, 1988, has held that the insurance company has to satisfy the award in favour of third party and recover the amount from the insured.11 ..... the vehicle. it is also contended by the learned counsel for the claimant that in the present case, the accident occurred after 14.11.94, i.e., after the amendment of motor vehicles act, 1988 and the above decisions cited by the learned counsel for the appellant, the accident had occurred prior to 14.11.1994 and, therefore, the .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Hira Tripathi and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002ACJ1400; 2001(1)MPHT221

..... . thus, the insurer cannot escape the liability particularly when driver has not been disqualified as licence has been renewed.9. adivision bench of karnataka high court in mrs. elizabeth leema v. t. narayan rao and others, ilr 1979 karnataka 1013, where licensed driver l. d'souza had held a licence which expired on 22nd january, 1972 and was not disqualified to obtain .....

Harvansh and Sons Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2003]133TAXMAN926(MP)

..... word seller from section 44ac which statutorily included the persons selling as well as his agent within the ambit of expression seller. but now section 44ac stands repealed and section 206c which is self-contained does not include the agent of a person selling the goods within the definition of seller for the purposes of ..... central government, state government, local authority, corporations, etc.) at the specified rates, with reference to the purchase price including the excise duty, etc.3. the above amendment has come into force with effect from the assessment year 1991-92-and, therefore, will be applicable to the collections under section 206c made during the financial year 1990- ..... , used in section 44ac of the income tax act was being understood in different ways. in order to clarify this point, the finance act, 1990 has amended the said section to provide that the purchase price would mean any amount (by whatever name called) paid or payable by the buyer to obtain the goods referred .....

Rajneesh Kumar Dwivedi Vs. K.P. Enterprises and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)MPHT405

..... schedule i of the act, assessment of compensation can be made only on basis of evidence produced by applicant regarding loss of earning capacity. full bench of karnataka high court in shivalinga shivanagowda patiland another v. erappa basappa bhavihala (supra), has laid down that it is open to adduce acceptable evidence that after injury ..... suffered permanent total disablement or permanent partial disablement, as a result of the injuries, on the basis of evidence let in before him, remains unaffected by amendment to section 4(1)(c)(ii) by act 22 of 1984 inserting the words 'as assessed by the qualified medical practitioner'.(b) if the commissioner holds ..... inserting words 'as assessed by the qualified medical practitioner' after the words 'as is proportionate to the loss of earning capacity'. as a result of the amendment, qualified medical practitioner, in short, the qmp is required to assess not only the percentage of physical disability, but also assess the percentage of loss of earning .....

Jabalpur Bus Operators Association and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR325(MP)]; 2003(1)MPHT226

..... court in indo swiss time limited, dundahera v. umrao and ors. (air 1981 punjab & haryana 213) expresses the view similar to the minority view in govindnaik's case (karnataka) (supra). pertinent it is to quote the following paragraphs from the judgment :--'22. a perusal of the judgment in the municipal corporation of the city of ahmedabad, (1970) ..... embarrassing task, 'of preferring one view to another'.18. it is true that if there are two contrary legislations enacted by the same legislature, the later would impliedly repeal the earlier and would be the binding law. but we do not think that this legislative anology would at all be apposite and can help us in solving the ..... question before us because the very same legislature can always repeal or alter its own law, even impliedly, while over-ruling being an act of superior jurisdiction, one bench can not over-rule expressly or by implication, a .....