Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka rent control act 2001 section 2 application of the act Page 1 of about 7,663 results (0.273 seconds)

M. Subbarao and Sons Vs. Yashodamma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC3284; JT2002(7)SC230; 2002(6)SCALE532; (2002)7SCC553; [2002]SUPP2SCR448

..... constitution or on the appeals pursuant to the leave granted thereunder?6. section 70 of the new act and section 6 of the karnataka general clauses act, 1899 provide as under:-'70. repeal and savings.--(1) the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 32 of 1961) is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal and subject to the provisions of section ..... and a half years for vacating the premises which period was to expired on 11th april, 2002.3. with effect form 31.12.2001, the karnataka rent control act, 1999 (hereinafter 'the new act', for short) came into force. the suit premises are non-residential premises measuring 352 sq. ft. i.e. more than 14 sq. mts ..... eviction of the tenant-appellants on the grounds available under clauses (f), (h) and (p) of sub-section (1) of section 21 of karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter 'the old act', for short). the trial court directed eviction of the tenants on all the three grounds. in a revision preferred by the tenants, the learned .....

Kodi Nagappa Since Deceased by His Lrs. and ors. Vs. Smt. Hampamma Sin ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR3485; 2008(6)KLJ420; 2008(43)AIRKarR523; AIR2008NOC2321

..... and had been directed to vacate the premises and hand over vacant possession under the provisions of section 21(1)(h) and 21(1)(k) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (for short, the 1961 act).2. the legal heirs of tenant though had preferred a revision petition in hrcr no. 7 of 2002, on the file of principal district judge, ..... has put forth a two fold argument. it is firstly contended that the revisional court while exercising its revisional jurisdiction under section 5 of the rent control act, 1961 and later under section 46 of the karnataka rent act, 1999, could not have passed an eviction order against the petitioners to quit and hand over vacant possession of the premises on and after ..... . the record indicates that an application under order 22 rule 3 r/w rule 30 of the karnataka rent control rules 1961 was filed on 1.3.2001. the application it appears had not been ordered. it is thereafter that 1999 act came into force w.e.f 31.12.2001. the application was ordered by the court only .....

Bansilal Vs. Dr. N.C. Nagaraj

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(5)KarLJ377

..... the central government or a local authority;(ii) a muzarai or religious or charitable institution;(iii) a wakf.70. repeal and savings.--(1) the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 22 of 1961) is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal and subject to the provisions of section 69.--(a) all proceedings in execution of any ..... been filed therein.4. the revisional court was of this view for the reason that the karnataka rent control act, 1961 stood repealed as from 31-12-2001 and was replaced by karnataka rent act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as '1999 act' for short) and in terms of the provisions of section 70(2)(c) of the ..... petitioners are all tenants in the premises located in different places wherein the provisions of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as '1961 act' for short) was applicable and the respective landlords had initiated proceedings under this act for eviction of these tenants invoking the different provisos to section 21(1) of the .....

Bangalore Printing and Publishing Co. Ltd. Vs. Soukar T. Premnath

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR98

..... was placed,the facts being that an eviction suit was filed by the lessor in respectof a non-residential premises of a value of rs. 870/- per month when the karnataka rent control act, 1961 was in operation. the defendant to the suit questioned the jurisdiction of civil court to entertain the suit by contending that having regard to the annual rental value of ..... under the plaintiff and hence, he should file an 'judgment petition in view of section 31 of the karnataka rent control act', evidently because of karnataka rent control act, 1961 exempting its operation of chapter 5 pertaining to 'protection of tenants' against eviction only. but, in all other respects, the act applied with equal force even in respect of non-residential premises of a rental of more than rs .....

Piyari Bai (Since Deceased) By L.Rs. Vs. K.H. Vasantha and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... possession, as it was filed beyond the period of limitation for maintaining such an application. 8. rule 22 of the karnataka rent control rules, 2001, provides that an application for restoration of possession under sub-section (2) of section 35 of the act is to be filed within sixty days from the date of transfer of the property to a third party. 9. the ..... it to a third party on july 12, 2010 by executing a registered sale deed. 5. thereafter, an application under sub-section (2) of section 35 of the karnataka rent act, 1999 [for short, the act], was filed for restoration of the possession of the petition premises in favour of the tenant. 6. it has been proved that the landlord did not occupy the ..... (prayer: this revision petition is filed under section 46(1) of the karnataka rent act, 1999, against the order dated 23.5.2012 passed in miscellaneous case no. 224 of 2010, on the file of the chief judge, court of small causes, bangalore, dismissing the .....

Sri Rameshappa Vs. Sri Rudrappa Pattanashetty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5202; 2006(5)KarLJ495

..... leading to the filing of the revision petition may be stated as under:the respondent/land lord filed la-1 under section 29(1) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 in hrc no. 9/2001 on the file of principal civil judge (junior division) at davangere, seeking direction to the tenant to deposit the arrears of ..... , even without registering the revision petition, rejected the revision petition, as not maintainable, on the ground that the petitioner/tenant did not comply with section 45 of the karnataka rent act, 1999. therefore, the petitioner/tenant is before this court.5. the learned counsel for the petitioner/tenant submitted that as directed by the trial court, the amount of ..... 7249 was followed. the hon'ble apex court in above said grace case has held in para 9 of the judgement as under:'9... the provisions of the karnataka rent act in question are not happily worded. in fact, there is no limitation prescribed for preferring a revision petition. in any event, in view of the guidelines laid .....

Puttachannaiah Vs. R. Venkataram and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(1)KarLJ255

..... dated 19th february, 2001 passed in h.r.c. no. 1576 of 1997 allowing the application filed by respondents-landlords under section 29(4) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 ('the old act' for short) stopping all further proceedings in h.r.c. no. 1576 of 1997 and directing the petitioner to quit and deliver vacant possession of the ..... preferred and the petitioner could be permitted to call in question the legality and correctness of the impugned order.5. after coming into force of the karnataka rent act, 1999 ('the act' for short), it is mandatory for the tenant who prefers a revision under section 46 against any order made by a court subordinate to this court ..... under the provisions of the act or the old act to deposit all arrears of rent at the time of preferring the revision. the person preferring a revision has to mandatorily satisfy this requirement as a precondition for entitling .....

B. Prakash Chand Vs. S.V. Gyanchand Jain

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1387; 2004(2)KarLJ504

..... for eviction of the tenant under section 21(1) provisos (a), (h) and (i) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 ('old act' for short). after evidence, the said petition was allowed under section 21(1) proviso (h) of the old act, by order dated 18-8-2000 and the tenant was directed to deliver vacant possession of the suit premises ..... under article 136 against an order of this court dated 31-7-2001 rejecting the eviction petition, the supreme court held:'during the pendency of these proceedings, the karnataka rent act, 1999 has come into force with effect from 31-12-2001. according to the counter filed in this court by the respondent-tenant, the area of the ..... let out for non-residential purpose exceeds 14 square metres and, therefore, the premises are exempt from the provisions of the 1999 act. it is the plea of the respondent tenant that the karnataka rent act, 1999 being not applicable to the suit premises by virtue of the provisions contained in section 2(3)(g) the proceedings shall .....

Sultaan MohiyuddIn and ors. Vs. Basheer Ahmed Shariff and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC2441; JT2002(Suppl1)SC58; 2002(4)SCALE422; (2002)5SCC19; [2002]3SCR795

..... . the proceedings for eviction were initiated under section 21(1)(h) and (p) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961. the landlord, having lost from the high court, has filed this appeal by special leave under article 136 of the constitution.3. during the pendency of these proceedings, karnataka rent act, 1999 has come into force with effect from 31.12.2001. according to the counter filed ..... area of the suit premises let out for non-residential purpose exceeds 14square metres and, therefore, the premises are exempt from the provisions of the 1999 act. it is the plea of the tenant-respondent that karnataka rent act, 1999 being not applicable to the suit premises by virtue of the provisions contained in section 2(3)(g), the proceedings shall stand abated under .....

Vijaya Bank, Residency Road Branch Vs. Dynasty Holdings (P) Ltd., a Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ105; 2009(2)KCCR991; 2009(2)AIRKarR76; AIR2009NOC1284(D.B)

..... premises having a plinth area of not exceeding 14 sq. mts. used for commercial purposes).12. section 70 of the new rent act is relating to the repeals and savings. it reads as follows:70. repeal and savings:(1) the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (karnataka act 22 of 1961) is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal and subject to the provisions of section 69:(a)....(b)....(c ..... court, for decree of ejectment and mesne profits against defendant. defendant contested the suit by filing the written statement inter alia contending that, it is a tenant protected under the karnataka rent control act, 1961 ('krc act, 1961', for short) and therefore, the suit is not maintainable; that there was no proper termination of tenancy; that in view of the continued acceptance of .....