Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act 1991 section 1 short title and commencement Page 1 of about 283 results (0.212 seconds)

Raju Reddy Vs. Commissioner, Bda

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2514; 1995(4)KarLJ475

..... regularisation of the constructions on 10.11.1992 (vide annexures e1 and e2) and the said application is not yet disposed of; that though the property was acquired by bda, as he has already put up constructions prior to 31.3.1990, the petitioner was entitled to regularisation having regard to the provisions of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991 ('act' for short); and ..... karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (karnataka act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under sub-section (3a) of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964; (karnataka act 12 of 1964);(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title;(vi) unauthorised construction having more than two floors including ground floor;(vii) unauthorised constructions made in violation of urban (land ceiling and regulation) act, 1976 (central act 33 of 1976);(viii) unauthorised constructions made on the land belonging to or vested in any authority or a local authority; and(ix) unauthorised constructions ..... development authority act, 1976, or under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, or under section 15 of the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976, is published and which has not yet vested in favour of any authority for which the acquisition is proposed, may, on the application of such person made within sixty days of the commencement of this act, be regularised in .....

Mrs. Nayana B. Mehta Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(1)KarLJ45

..... 25654 of 1994, seeking a direction to the state government and also to the bda not to demolish the structures put up by him on the site in question pending consideration of his application before the screening committee constituted under the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991. ..... 83, sought regularisation of the unauthorised construction put up by him on the site in question under the provisions of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991 before the appropriate ..... appeal filed against the said order also came to be dismissed and thus, the request of the 3rd respondent for regularisation of unauthorised construction came to be rejected by the competent authority.4. ..... he further contended that unless the bda executed a sale deed there will be no transfer of title in respect of the auctioned site in favour of the appellant and therefore the appellant could not have initiated any legal action against 3rd respondent, as such, the learned single judge ought to have granted the reliefs sought in the writ petition.13 ..... the facts leading to the presentation of this appeal as set out by the appellant, are as under:by notification dated 3-12-1992, the bangalore development authority (for short, 'the bda') proposed to auction corner sites carved in the acquired land bearing sy. ..... against the said order an appeal was filed by the 3rd respondent under section 8-a of the said act before the appellate authority. .....

John B. James and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Anoth ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4134; 2001(1)KarLJ364

..... act' for karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976; 'planning act' for karnataka town and country planning act, 1961; 'public premises act' for karnataka public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1974; and 'regularisation act' for karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991.1.1 these petitions have been heard with several other batches relating to other layouts of bda, the common factor being the relief sought, based on section 38-c(2) of the bda act, which was inserted by karnataka act ..... of the land since prior to the first day or january, 1995 and has continued to be in possession of the land as on the date of commencement of the bangalore development authority (amendment) act, 1999; (ii) the allottee makes payment towards the allotment of land, such ..... and documents on which they were claiming title and/or possession, particulars of any construction put up and whether the construction if any was done after obtaining a licence from the local authority and whether they have been shown as khatedars or owners or persons in possession, in the records of the local authority, and ..... section 38-c(2) will be brought into force within a short time by issuing a notification, as the said section had been introduced to fulfill the promises held out by successive governments in power from 1987, to regularise unauthorised constructions; and that in accordance with section 38-c(2), the sites held/possessed by them will have to be allotted and .....

M. Ramachandra Vs. Deputy Commissioner (Land Acquisition), Bangalore D ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(4)KarLJ464

..... thus, the petitioner, who was appellant in that writ appeal was allowed to withdraw the appeal and liberty was reserved to prosecute the application with the respondents 1 and 2, for regularisation.according to petitioner, respondent 1, by order dated 30-1-1996, rejected the petitioner's application for regularisation after having taken the view that application of the petitioner comes under section 4(viii) of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991, for short 'the act' and therefore, the petitioner's request could not be considered by the respondent 1.3. ..... prepared under the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (karnataka act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under sub-section (3-a) of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (karnataka act 12 of 1964);(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title,(vi) unauthorised constructions having more than two floors including ground floor;(vii) unauthorised constructions made in violation of urban (land ceiling and regulations) act, 1976 (central act 33 of 1976);(viii) unauthorised constructions made on the land belonging to or vested in any authority or a local authority;(ix) unauthorised constructions on any land reserved .....

B.T. Sakku Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, Bang ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1995Kant192; ILR1994KAR3267; 1995(1)KarLJ361

..... is not competent to oust the plaintiff from the suit land in view of the government order of 1986 and fn the light of the provisions of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions fn urban 'areas act 1991. ..... defendant-1 has contended its written statement that there is no bar to acquire the land coming with the purview of the provisions of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976 (for short the ulcar act), defcndant-1 denied the allegation that liberty was reserved to ihe plaintiff by dismissing the suit at o. s. no. ..... demolition or alteration of buildings or well work unlawfully commenced, carried on or completed - (1) if the commissioner is satisfied, (i) that the construction or reconstruction of any building or hut or well - (a) has been commenced without obtaining his permission or where an appeal or reference has been made to the standing committee, in contravention of any order passed by the standing committee; or (b) is being carried on, or has been completed otherwise than in accordance with the ..... defendant-2 asserted that plaintiff was served with notice under sections 9, 10 and 1 of the land acquisition act and she appeared before the land acquisition officer and filed objections requesting for dropping the proceedings. ..... in that view of the matter, it is for the plaintiff to produce satisfactory evidence to show that either she or her predecessors-in-title who would fall within the category of persons under s. .....

Ganapatsa Shankarsa Kalburgi and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Oth ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1999Kant38; ILR1998KAR3119; 1998(5)KarLJ518

..... the petitioners have, however, contended that, they are entitled for regularisation of their unauthorised constructions in view of the provisions of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991 (hereinafter called 'the act'). ..... section 3 of the act deals with regularisation of unauthorised constructions and it reads thus.-'3. ..... sri chan-dangoudar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has contended that, that in view of clause (iii) of section 3 of the act, the sites belong to the petitioners and, therefore, they are entitled for regularisation of unauthorised constructions.5. ..... ) belonging to him which is proposed to be acquired in connection with any development scheme of an authority, in relation to which a notification under the bangalore development authority act, 1976, or under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, or under section 15 of the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976, is published and which has not yet vested in favour of any authority for which the acquisition is proposed, may, on the application of such person made within sixty days of the commencement of this act, be regularised in accordance with the provisions of this .....

K.B. Ramachandra Raje Urs Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2001Kant512

..... to the impugned notice at annexure-b in the connected writ petition is justified for the reason that the muda has no authority either under the provisions of the 1903 act or under the provisions of karnataka (regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas) act, 1991 to regularise the unauthorised constructions upon the land in question. ..... of the statement of objections filed on behalf of 2nd respondent it is stated that the regularisation of unauthorised construction is being done by the committee specially constituted by the state government and not by this authority (muda). ..... the same is aptly applicable to this case as even before the scheme was evolved and approved, proceedings for acquisition of land had been commenced and concluded and major portion of the acquired land is granted in favour of 28th respondent by the ..... of the repeated query, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-society could not point or produce any order of the state government under section 3(f)(vi) of the act granting prior approval and prescribing conditions and restrictions in respect of the use of the lands which were to be acquired for a public purpose. ..... had been acquired by the mysore urban developmentauthority (hereinafter referred to as 'muda' in short) purportedly for implementing a scheme called vijayashreepura extension in exercise of its power under the provisions of erstwhile city of mysore improvement act, 1903 (hereinafter referred to as '1903 act' in short). ..... short .....

A. Bhaskar and Another Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others, Etc.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant209; ILR1993KAR3103; 1993(4)KarLJ275

..... section 3 of the said act provides for regularisation of unauthorised constructions made in any urban area, except those specified in section 4, made prior to the 31st day of march, 1990 by any person on land (i) belonging to the state government; or (ii) which is a revenue site owned by him; or (iii) belonging to him which is proposed to be acquired in connection with any development scheme of an authority, in relation to which a notification under the bangalore development authority act, 1976, or under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, or under section 15 of the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976, is published and ..... whereas unauthorised constructions on revenue land belonging to the government are sought to be regularised under the aforesaid act, the impugned circulars frown upon mere registration of documents pertaining to properties bearing 'khaneshumari' numbers, owned by the petitioners, on ..... i may notice certain provisions of karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991. ..... act provides that in the above cases on the application of such person made within sixty days of the commencement of the act be regularised in accordance with the provisions of the act ..... section 20 of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, the government has granted exemption in innumerable cases after the commencement of the said act, for use of agricultural lands for other purposes long before section 95 of the land revenue act .....

G. Umadevi Vs. Bangalore Development Authority, Bangalore and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(5)KarLJ199

..... it has further been asserted that the provisions of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised construction in urban areas act of 1991 cannot be made applicable as the land had already vested with ..... petition has been filed after twelve years from the date of allotment in favour of the respondents 2 and 3, it does not appear just and proper to issue writ of mandamus even if it be taken that authority has been conferred with power in the circumstances referred to in section 38-c to allot the site by way of sale or lease to the previous owner and the section which has been introduced in 1994 has been given retrospective effect only with effect from 20-12-1975. ..... and contended that the law has been laid down in this case that the bangalore development authority has no power to reconvey the site and reconveyance has not at all been contemplated under the act or the rules and therefore the petitioner's predecessors in title did not have any right to seek ..... has already been awarded and it has not been disputed and rebutted and once either the petitioner or his predecessors in title thereto, when any of them had received the compensation with respect to the land in dis-pute, petitioner had no right to get the site reconveyed and because of the fact that compensation has been awarded to the petitioner, petitioner is entitled to the grant of reliefs as claimed ..... suguna had no right, title or interest in the land since after its acquisition and publication of preliminary notification .....

Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... much before the present amendments were effected, the state had enacted the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991 and had set out in its statement of objects and reasons that, bengaluru development authority and the local bodies have been finding it difficult in their task of meeting the increasing demand for residential areas due to disproportionately high number of unauthorised constructions on urban land. ..... short title and commencement. ..... the above writ petitions are to declare the karnataka town and country planning and certain other laws (amendment) act, 2013; the karnataka town and country planning and certain other laws (amendment) act, 2009; the karnataka town and country planning act and certain other laws (amendment) act, 2004; the karnataka town and country planning (regularisation of unauthorised development or constructions) rules 2014; section 11 321-a of the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976 and section 187-a of the karnataka municipalities act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of india; the further prayer sought .....