Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka public service commission conduct of business and additional functions act 1959 section 18 rules Page 1 of about 926 results (0.082 seconds)

Jul 13 2000 (HC)

Dr. Mahesh B.P. and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR3055; 2000(6)KarLJ116

ORDERChandrashekaraiah, J. 1. The Karnataka Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'KPSC' for short) published a notification dated 30-4-1999 calling for applications for the purpose of selection to the post of Insurance Medical Officers in the Department of Employees State Insurance. Pursuant to the said notification the petitioners and others made applications for selection. The KPSC after scrutinising all the applications with reference to the rules relating to reservation of certain number of posts, issued notice to the eligible candidates to appear before it for selection. Accordingly, the petitioner and others appeared before the KPSC. The KPSC taking into consideration the marks secured in the interview and in the degree examination with rural weightage if any, selected and published the list of candidates on 1-10-1999 as required under the rules. Thereafter, KPSC issued a press note which reads as follows:'The interviews for the following posts will be held from ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2017 (HC)

Dr (Smt) Mangala Sridhar Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 6th day of March, 2017 PRESENT: R THE HONBLE MR SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE BUDIHAL R B Writ Appeal No 3169 of 2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN DR (SMT) MANGALA SRIDHAR AGED ABOUT40YEARS W/O MR SRIDHAR NARAYANI H NO1914 SHRI LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA 18TH A MAIN ROAD5H CROSS, 2ND STAGE J P NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078 ... APPELLANT (By Sri Sajan Poovayya, Senior Advocate a/w Sri Prakash M H, Advocate) THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIDHANA SOUDHA POLICE STATION VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri A S Ponnanna, Additional Advocate General a/w Sri V Sreenidhi, AGA) AND1 2. 2 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN WRIT PETITION No.22801 OF2014DATED239-2014. THIS WRIT APPEAL, HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT, COMING...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2017 (HC)

Dr. Mangala Sridhar Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Chi ...

Court : Karnataka

(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the Order passed in Writ Petition No. 22801 of 2014 Dated 23-9-2014.) 1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated September 23, 2014, passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge in W.P.No.22801 of 2014 dismissing the writ petition. 2. The short point that arises for consideration in this writ appeal pertains to the power of the Hon'ble Governor to suspend a member of a State Public Service Commission under Article 317(2) of the Constitution of India. 3. The appellant, Dr.Mangala Sridhar, was appointed as a Member of the Karnataka Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'KPSC' in short) under Article 316(1) of the Constitution of India by an order issued by the Governor of Karnataka on November 24, 2012. There were various allegations and counter allegations pertaining to corruption, which led to an investigation by Criminal Investigation Department ('CID' in short)...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2000 (HC)

State Election Commission Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(3)ALD456

ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J. 1. Before we decide the principal issue raised in these writ petitions, we briefly narrate the contentions raised in all these writ petitions.WPNo.2481 of 2000:This writ petition is filed by the State Election Commission, represented by its Secretary, Buddha Bhawan, Secunderabad. Petitioner has questioned the validity of the Ordinance No.3 of 2000 dated 5-2-2000 issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh and the consequential letter dated 10-2-2000 of the first respondent and seeks to quash the same as being untenable and repugnant to Article 243-E(3) of the Constitution of India and for issuing appropriate orders.2. According to the petitioner, as the term of ofice of the Mandal Parishads and Zilla Parishads in the State of Andhra Pradesh would be expiring on 17-3-2000 and 19-3-2000 respectively, it initiated action for conduct of elections to these bodies by taking appropriate steps, viz., addressing letters to all the District Collectors instructing them to take ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2006 (HC)

Shree Vidhya Vikas Mandal and 51 ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and 6 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2007)1GLR479

D.A. Mehta, J.1. This petition prays for following reliefs:21. The petitioners, therefore, pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:A. admit this Special Civil Application.B. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction against the respondents declaring the Government Resolutions dated 21.05.1994 and 21.12.1994 as unconstitutional, illegal and quash and set aside the same by issuing a writ, order or direction.C. pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this Special Civil Application the operation, execution and implementation of Government Resolutions dated 21.5.1994 and 21.12.1994 at Annexure 'D' (collectively) be stayed and the respondents be directed not to implement the provisions of the said Government Resolutions.D. Pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this Special Civil Application, the operation, execution and implementation of the order dated 11.11.1997 passed by the District Education Officer, M...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2018 (HC)

T N Raviprakash Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 - - WP No.58401/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JANUARY2018PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND R THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.58401/2017 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: T.N.RAVIPRAKASH S/O NARASIMHE GOWDA AGED ABOUT52YEARS SECOND DIVISION SURVEYOR BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU & R/AT NO.428 6TH MAIN, KENGERI UPANAGARA BENGALURU 560 060 (BY SRI M.NAGAPRASANNA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001 ...PETITIONER2 3. COMMISSIONER OF SURVEY SETTLEMENT & LAND RECORDS IN KARNATAKA, NEW PUBLIC OFFICES K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU 560 001 THE REGISTRAR KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001 2 - - WP No.58401/2017 4. ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF ENQUIRIES-8 KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001 RESPONDENTS (BY MS.M.S.PRATHIMA, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI VENKATESH S.ARBATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & ...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2017 (HC)

Association of Concerned Citizens of New Delhi vs.new Delhi Municipal ...

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.3348/2010 ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Sahil Sood and Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Ms. Meera Bhatia, Advocates for UOI. W.P. (C) No.12689/2009 WITH $~ * 32. + 28. + BABAR ROAD COLONY LEASE HOLDER ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta and Mr. Alpana Malik, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates f...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2017 (HC)

Babar Road Colony Lease Holder Association vs.new Delhi Municipal Cou ...

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.3348/2010 ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Sahil Sood and Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Ms. Meera Bhatia, Advocates for UOI. W.P. (C) No.12689/2009 WITH $~ * 32. + 28. + BABAR ROAD COLONY LEASE HOLDER ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta and Mr. Alpana Malik, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates f...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2017 (HC)

Wazir Estates P Ltd. & Anr vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Anr

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.3348/2010 ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Sahil Sood and Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Ms. Meera Bhatia, Advocates for UOI. W.P. (C) No.12689/2009 WITH $~ * 32. + 28. + BABAR ROAD COLONY LEASE HOLDER ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta and Mr. Alpana Malik, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates f...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2017 (HC)

Jor Bagh Association & Ors. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Ors

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.3348/2010 ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Sahil Sood and Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Ms. Meera Bhatia, Advocates for UOI. W.P. (C) No.12689/2009 WITH $~ * 32. + 28. + BABAR ROAD COLONY LEASE HOLDER ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta and Mr. Alpana Malik, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Standing Counsel and Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates f...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //