Court : Karnataka
..... dispute. before embarking upon consideration of the issue on its merits, it is 8 germane to notice who is the petitioner. the state of karnataka has promulgated the karnataka prohibition of beggary act, 1975. the central relief committee is constituted under chapter-iv of the said act. it reads as follows: constitution and administration4 central relief ..... reserved for orders on3101.2024, coming on for pronouncement this day, the court made the following:- order the petitioner/central relief committee constituted under the karnataka prohibition of beggary act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the act for short) is calling in question an order dated 22-09-2017 passed by the 1st ..... is the bounden duty of the central relief committee to make use of the property in question including collection of beggary cess for proper and effective implementation of the provisions of karnataka prohibition of beggary act, 1975. it is also amply clear from the reading of the orders that, no part of the property .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... under article 14. equality of opportunity for unequals can only mean aggravation of inequality. equality of opportunity admits discrimination with reason and prohibits discrimination without reason. discrimination with reasons means rational classification for differential treatment having nexus to the constitutionally permissible object. preferential representation for ..... thirty-six. schedule part i madras (1) scheduled castes throughout the province :- adi-andhra gosangi paidi adi-dravida haddi painda adi-karnataka hasla paky ajila holeya pallan arunthuthiyar jaggali pambada 24 baira jambuvulu pamidi bakuda kalladi panchama bandi kanakkan paniyan bariki kodalo panniandi battada koosa ..... the appropriate and constitutional approach.39. mahendra kumar mitra, petitioner-in-person appearing on behalf of dr. ambedkar scheduled castes federation, karnataka submitted that the recommendation of the justice usha mehra committee to include clause (3) to article 341 providing parliament the power to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... does not serve as any limitation ......................... 129 d. section 9 does not serve as a limitation on the taxing powers of state ........... 134 7 e. any limitation can extend to prohibition ........................................................ 135 f. impact of taxes on mineral rights on mineral development ............................. 142 i. scope of entry 49 ................................................................................................. 146 i. land system in india ........................................................................................ 146 ii. tax on land ..... for almost all manufacturing industries and physical infrastructure.22. most of the minerals are spatially located in a few mineral rich states, namely, andhra pradesh, chhattisgarh, gujarat, jharkhand, karnataka, madhya pradesh, orissa, rajasthan, and west bengal.11 since mineral resources are a shared inheritance of the people, it has always been the imperative of the indian state to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , and ensure equitable access to social and public spaces, including burial grounds. rule 11 of these rules requires the appropriate government to take adequate steps to prohibit discrimination in any government or private organisation or establishment including in the areas of education, employment, healthcare, public transportation, participation in public life, sports, leisure ..... she unable to hide her true gender identity. circumstance forced her to become a sex worker to sustain herself. later, she was awarded the karnataka rajyotsava award, karnataka s second highest civilian award, for her contribution to social service. e. yet another petitioner who is a transgender person was born in a ..... country; 33 reliance was placed on shafin jahan v. asokan k.m. (2018) 16 scc368 shakti vahini (supra), laxmibai chandaragi b. v. state of karnataka (2021) 3 scc360 deepika singh (supra) 20 part b j. denial of the right to marry amounts to a deprivation of the entitlement to full citizenship .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... however, sought to highlight before us the unhealthy practice of the customers showering money on the dancers during the performance, in the prohibited establishments. this encourages the girls to indulge in unhealthy competition to create and sustain sexual interest of the most favoured customers. but ..... bars are controlled by the following regulations: (i) the bombay municipal corporation act; (ii) the bombay police act, 1951; (iii) the bombay prohibition act, 1949; (iv) the rules for licensing and controlling places of public entertainment, 1953; (v) the rules for licensing and controlling places ..... to lead to undesirable results. reliance was placed upon state of bombay v. r.m.d.chamarbaugwala [air1957sc699 , khoday distilleries ltd. v. state of karnataka [(1995) 1 scc574 , state of punjab v. devans modern breweries ltd. [(2004) 11 scc26 , new york state liquor authority v. bellanca ..... 1 in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru r dated this the21t day of april, 2023 before the hon'ble mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... packing in bottles, packages and other containers of drugs [or cosmetics]., [including the use of packing material which comes into direct contact with the drugs]. and prohibit the sale, stocking or exhibition for sale, or distribution of drugs [or cosmetics]., packed in contravention of such conditions; (j) regulate the mode of labelling ..... , short listed for interview, was published on 07.11.2019 and after that some of the candidates were indeed interviewed also. the copy of the karnataka health and family welfare services (drugs control department non-teaching staff) (recruitment rules), 2013 based on which the eligibility criteria was fixed, is produced and ..... under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and set aside the impugned order passed by the hon ble karnataka administrative tribunal, prinicipal bench at bengaluru in application nos. 5773-5786/2020, 6990/2020, 692-6928/2020, 6516/2020, 856/2021, 6495/2020 dated1205 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... packing in bottles, packages and other containers of drugs [or cosmetics]., [including the use of packing material which comes into direct contact with the drugs]. and prohibit the sale, stocking or exhibition for sale, or distribution of drugs [or cosmetics]., packed in contravention of such conditions; (j) regulate the mode of labelling ..... , short listed for interview, was published on 07.11.2019 and after that some of the candidates were indeed interviewed also. the copy of the karnataka health and family welfare services (drugs control department non-teaching staff) (recruitment rules), 2013 based on which the eligibility criteria was fixed, is produced and ..... under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and set aside the impugned order passed by the hon ble karnataka administrative tribunal, prinicipal bench at bengaluru in application nos. 5773-5786/2020, 6990/2020, 692-6928/2020, 6516/2020, 856/2021, 6495/2020 dated1205 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... constitutionalism. the country feels agonised when money and muscle power become the supreme power. substantial efforts have to be undertaken to cleanse the polluted stream of politics by prohibiting people with criminal antecedents so that they do not even conceive of the idea of entering into politics. they should be kept at bay. it would appear ..... pending before subordinate court. this court's power under article 142(1) to do complete justice is entirely of different level and of a different quality. any prohibition or restriction contained in ordinary laws cannot act as a limitation on the constitutional power of this court. once this court has seisin of a cause or matter ..... in states (1) for every state there shall be a legislature which shall consist of the governor, and (a) in the states of bihar, madhya pradesh, maharashtra, karnataka and uttar pradesh, two houses: (b) in other states, one house (2) where there are two houses of the legislature of a state, one shall be known as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... snobbish attitude in the portrayal of certain ethnic, linguistic and regional groups. similarly, the advertising code under rule 7 of the cable television networks rules, 1994 prohibits the carriage of advertisements on the cable service which hurt the religious susceptibilities of subscribers, which derides any race, caste, colour, creed or nationality, or incite ..... liability recourse to ordinary courts of law is indispensable.114. quoting from wade and phillips on constitutional law, this court pointed out in the state of karnataka (supra) that responsibility to parliament only means that the minster may be compelled by convention to resign.115. the extent to which the enforcement of ..... of a civil suit under article 131, to the appointment by the central government, of a commission of enquiry against the chief minister of karnataka, had an occasion to consider the exposition of the words collective 108 (1977) 4 scc608139 responsibility appearing in article 164(2). after indicating .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... admit that erp was not the core issue in the matter, but the petitioners before the karnataka high court had no choice as they were, inter alia, attacking the government order dated 5 february 2022, which clearly stated that prohibiting hijab in schools will not be violative of article 25 of the constitution of india. be ..... reply was that fundamental rights are not absolute and they are always subject to reasonable restrictions. prohibiting hijab inside a classroom is a reasonable restriction. wearing of hijab was also said to be not an essential religious practice.12. the karnataka high court had formulated four questions for its consideration. these questions are as follows: a) ..... in the abovementioned rulings of the hon ble supreme court and various high courts, since the prohibition of a headscarf or a garment covering the head is not a violation of article 25 of the constitution. additionally, in terms of the [karnataka education act, 1983 article 133 sub rule (2) and article 7(1)(i), 7( .....
Tag this Judgment!