Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 61 penalty for manufacture of articles mentioned in section 16 in contravention of provisions of section 49 Page 1 of about 104 results (0.207 seconds)

Rudrappa Mahadevappa Humbi (Deceased) by L.Rs and ors. Vs. Shivalingap ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001(6)KarLJ394

..... constructions made by them', when they handed over the vacant possession to the lessors-landlords herein.4. during the subsistence of the lease, the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'act' for brevity) came into force, which governed the relationship of the landlord and tenant in the matter of evictions and other matters provided therein.5 ..... sub-lease complained of by the landlord was at a point of time much after coming into force part 5 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 and also the act. therefore,section 23 of the act, applies to the facts of the case. by that section, he is debarred from sub-leasing,23. shri subhash b. adi ..... iyengar deserves to be accepted for the following reasons.-section 23 of the karnataka rent control act prohibits the tenant from sub-leasing the leased property after the commencement of part v of the act. the act came into force on 16-11-1961. section 23 of the act reads as under.- '(1) notwithstanding anything contained in any law, but .....

Jayashankara Gowda Vs. Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR1005

..... orderbopanna, j.1. in this batch of writ petitions the constitutional validity of the karnataka local authorities (prohibition of defection) act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the act) is challenged by the petitioners on various grounds. principally their challenge is premised on the ground of violation of articles 14, 19(1)(a) and ..... political party is one of the essential features for the establishment of panchayat raj and that is the reason the preamble to the act makes it clear that the act is meant to prohibit defection by the members of the zilla parishad and mandal panchayat from the political parties by which they were set up as candidates ..... urgency in dealing with such complaints and if any authority is necessary on this point, the decision of the supreme court in bata shoes co. v. ganguly, : (1961)illj303sc may be referred to. in the circumstances, the impugned order does not call for interference. accordingly, these petitions stand dismissedin writ petition no. 13844 of 1987, .....

Munimasthaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2323; 1996(1)KarLJ57

..... the comprehensive development plan or outline development plan prepared under the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (karnataka act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under sub-section (3a) of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964; (karnataka act 12 of 1964),(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on ..... necessary to wait till the screening committee to consider and dispose of the application for regularization of unauthorised construction. section 4 imposes a prohibition on the screening committee to regularise unauthorised construction of certain categories. where the application for regularization of such unauthorised construction comes within the ..... constructions enumerated in clauses (i) to (ix) of section 4, such unauthorised constructions shall not be regularised. it is a statutory prohibition against regularization by the screening committee. if there is an admitted fact or it is shown that the unauthorised construction belongs to any of .....

Aishat Shifa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... on february 5, 2022. this g.o has a preamble, which refers to the karnataka education act, 1983 and the rules framed therein, from where it draws its powers and then cites three judgments of different high courts to conclude that prohibiting hijab does not amount to a violation of article 25 of the constitution. it then ..... to the government education department (pre-university) *substituted by the corrigendum/addendum dated 5.2.2022 **inserted by the corrigendum/addendum dated 5.2.202215. the karnataka education act, 19839, under which the above government order has been issued, was enacted with a view to foster the harmonious development of the mental and physical faculties ..... in the abovementioned rulings of the hon ble supreme court and various high courts, since the prohibition of a headscarf or a garment covering the head is not a violation of article 25 of the constitution. additionally, in terms of the [karnataka education act, 1983 article 133 sub rule (2) and article 7(1)(i), 7(2)(g .....

Tejaswini Patil and Etc. Vs. Bangalore Uuniversity and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1991Kant352; ILR1991KAR387; 1991(1)KarLJ556

..... two thousand only). for this purpose 'government seats' shall mean government seats as defined by section 2(e) of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fees) act, 1984; (c) karnataka students (other than students admitted against government seats as at (b) above) admitted by private medical colleges shall be charged ..... lakh rupees i.e. selling the medical and engineering collegeseats. the government has also powers to take action under the karnataka educational institutions prohibition of capitation fees act, 1985, under section 9 the government can authorise any high ranking officer to search and inspect the records and other documents ..... -10 lakh rupees) in the name of donation (unaccounted, no receipt for the payment) violating all the provisions of the karnataka educational institutions prohibition of capitation fees act 1984. even in the legislative assembly speaker s. m. krishna also charged that these colleges are collecting huge amount. the government .....

Veranna Veerabhadrappa Vs. the District Registrar and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant27; ILR2004KAR4699; 2004(7)KarLJ646

..... which the declaration has been published under section 19 of the bangalore development authority act 1976 or section 19 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987. therefore, as could be seen from the above provisions that what is prohibited is alienation of lands situated in urban area which has been acquired by the government ..... have been either acquired by government or in respect of which acquisition proceedings have been initiated by the government. sections 3 & 4 of the act read as under: 3. prohibition on transfer of lands acquired by government - no person shall purport to transfer by sale, mortgage, gift, lease or otherwise any land ..... the registration act as well as the karnataka (restriction on transfer) act 1991, hereinafter called the restriction on transfer act, and under the urban land ceiling act. it was contended by the learned senior counsel that the sub-registrar has no power to refuse to register the sale deed when none of the acts prohibit the registration .....

V.D.S.R.Re.Rolling Mill. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

..... respondent 3 and 4. thus the respondents 3 and 4 became tenants. they filed an application in form-7 under section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, for registering them as occupants thereof, and that the land tribunal concerned having held an enquiry, granted occupancy rights in their favour, as prayed ..... of law or on the basis of rules or regulations governing such grant. after the coming into force of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (karnataka act 2 of 1979), notices were issued by the appropriate authority to the transferees of such lands to show cause as ..... this ground also, the petition should fail. secondly, the grants made in favour of the original grantees are admittedly free grants. the rule governing the grant prohibited alienation of the lands in question permanently. the lands in question were granted to scheduled caste person taking into account their social backgrounds, poverty, illiteracy and .....

Tashi Delek Gaming Solutions (Private) Limited and ors. Vs. State of K ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant261; ILR2005KAR1548; 2005(2)KarLJ403

..... dated 24-7-2004 issued in exercise of powers conferred by section 5 of the lotteries (regulation) act, 1998 (for short, 'the act') the government of karnataka declared the state to be a free zone from online and internet lotteries and prohibited the sale of all computerized and online lottery tickets marketed and operated through vending machines, terminals, electronic ..... learned single judge also held that it was the state government alone which could prohibit the sale of lottery tickets in a state under section 5 of the act and when the sale is so prohibited as has been done by the state of karnataka by the impugned notification, it was only the state of sikkim or other state ..... governments which could feel aggrieved by the said prohibition and not any individual. it was further held that .....

G.K. Pushpa and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its C ...

Court : Karnataka

..... by the special recruitment committee shall be appointed by the appointing authority. rule 8 specifies that the karnataka civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules 1957, the karnataka civil services (conduct) rules, 1966 and karnataka civil services (prohibition) rules, 1977 and all other rules for the time being in force regulating the recruitment and ..... case of anuj garg and others versus hotel association of india and others [(2008) 3 scc 1]dealing with section 30 of the punjab excise act, 1914 which prohibited employment of "any man under the age of 25 years" or "any woman" in any part of such premises in which liquor or ..... conditions of service of government servants made or deemed to have been made under the karnataka state civil services act, 1978, in so far .....

H.C. Yatheesh Kumar and ors. Vs. the Karnataka Election Commission and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3323

..... zilla panchayats by rotation), rules 1998 (hereinafter called the 'rules 1998') as illegal, void and ultra vires to article 243d of the constitution read with section 162 of the karnataka, panchayat raj act, 1993. it is further prayed for a writ of certiorari to quash the notifications issued by the 1st respondent state election commission relating to delimitation of the constituencies and ..... the panchayats were held during 1960 by giving due representation to women, scheduled caste and scheduled tribes, subsequently the government of karnataka replaced the act, of 1959 by a new act called karnataka zilla parishads, taluk panchayat samithis, mandal panchayats and nyaya panchayats act, 1983.3. realising the importance of local self governance units in building the nation, the law makers brought to the fore .....