Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prisons act 1963 section 25 removal and discharge of prisoners Page 1 of about 135 results (0.068 seconds)

Abdul Basheer Vs. Inspector General Of Police (prisons)

Court : Karnataka

..... approver and, therefore, it was necessary to shift all the accused persons except the one who turned as an approver to various prisons in the state. the transfer of prisoners from one prison to the other is dealt with under the karnataka prisons act, 1963. the prisons manual which captures the statutory provisions in clauses 537 and 538 read as follows: 537. statutory provision; i. under section 8 ..... another within the state vests with government and subject to its 19 order under the control of the director general of prisons and correctional services; ii. section 25 of the karnataka prisons act, 1963, requires that all prisoners before to transfer shall be examined by the medical officer who shall certify that they are free from any illness rendering them unfit for removal.538. reasons and .....

High Court of Karnataka, Rep. by the Registrar General, Bangalore Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

..... sections 55 to 58 of the chapter xii of the prisons act deals with regard to temporary release of prisoners and the penalty in the event ..... steps taken as against the prisoners, who failed to surrender after the completion of the parole period and he has no objection for issuing appropriate directions. 5. the karnataka prisons act, 1963 (in short, 'the prisons act') and the karnataka prisons rules, 1974 (in short, 'the prisons rules), governs the release of prisoners on parole. more particularly ..... electronically intimate the jurisdictional police of the failure of convict to surrender and committing of an offence under section 58 of the karnataka prisons act and post the matter after a period of six months for the review of the actions taken in this regard. 4. .....

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR1605

..... we are of the opinion that neither the argument nor the decision of the high court that the acquisition is not for a public purposes is correct'.'24. the karnataka act, as its title shows, was enacted to provide for the acquisition of contract carriages and for matters incidental, ancillary and subservient thereto. it was enacted under entry 42 ..... behalf.13.(i) points (f) & (g):- in w.p.nos. 8512-13/2004 the petitioners have prayed for quashing section 3 of amendment act (karnataka act no. 9 of 2003) by which the kcca act is repealed. mr. m.c. narasimhan, learned senior counsel for the petitioners has mainly relied upon the constitutional bench decisions of the apex court in ..... 51604/2003 referred in para (iv) is dismissed.(c) w.p. nos. 8512-13/2004 mentioned in para (v) are allowed and section 3 of karnataka act no. 9/2003 repealing cca act is struck down as the same is violative of article 39(b)(c) of the constitution of india and decisions of the apex court and therefore unconstitutional.( .....

M.S. Syed Anwar and Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Police, Bangalore City an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1606; 1991(2)KarLJ375

..... the principles mentioned above as indicated in section 96 of the act of 1963, 54, 55 and 56 of the same act read with act 5 karnataka habitual offenders act of 1961, karnataka prohibition beggary act of 1971 and identification of prisoners act of 20 including para 1058 of karnataka police manual it is clear that for the purpose of getting ..... whether prescription mentioned in the police manual can be said has force of law or otherwise ? 3. whether provisions of identification of prisoners act of 1920 is subservient to the karnataka police act and police manual or otherwise ?3. the facts which are not in dispute are that the petitioner no. 1 in the first ..... they are a clear case of misusing the powers on the one hand and misconstruing the provisions of criminal procedure code, karnataka police act and instructions given in the police manual and also identification of prisoners act of 1920; (2) the instructions that have been given in the police manual regarding maintaining history-sheet are .....

M. P. Jayaraj Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1460

..... , are heard. in this order, the advisory board for the district prison, mysore, will hereinafter be referred to as the 'advisory board'. the karnataka prisons act, 1963 ; the karnataka prison rules, 1974 ; and the karnataka prison manual, 1978, will be referred to in this order as the 'act', 'rules' and 'manual' respectively.4. it is contended on behalf ..... recommendation of the advisory board, for premature release, has depended upon the minority view expressed by the district judge, mysore and the inspector general of prisons, karnataka, who in turn have given their opinion only on the basis that 'the commissioner of police, bangalore, and the district magistrate, bangalore had ..... ordinary remissions earned from 1-1-1983 to 6-4-1983. thus, the state government has acted upon the minority opinion expressed by the district and sessions judge, mysore and the inspector general of prisons, karnataka, who, as it is already pointed out, have proceeded on wrong assumption of vital facts. .....

Sanjay JaIn Vs. the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4820

..... the order of parole indicates otherwise, it forms an exception.6. in the present case, as rightly pointed out by the learned addl. govt. advocate, the karnataka prison manual, 1978 framed under the karnataka prisons act, article 650 deals with the 'parole' and in the same, it is clearly mentioned that 'the period spent under parole will not count as a part ..... of sentence'.7. this clearly indicates that so far as state of karnataka is concerned, the period of detention would stand automatically extended even if a person is ..... brother of the petitioner who was arrested, tried and convicted in s.c. no. 130/98 for the offence punishable under the provisions of n.d.p.s. act. it is not much in dispute that the spl. judge has found him guilty of the offence alleged and sentenced him to undergo r.i. for 10 years with .....

D.S. Vijaya Kumar Vs. Deputy Conservator of Forest, Hassan Division, H ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1375; 2002(2)KarLJ537

..... was seized by the district forest officer and his staff near vatehole nale cross near alur-chikkodi road, initiated confiscation proceedings under section 71-a of the karnataka forest act, 1963 ('the act' for short). notice of this proceeding was served on the petitioner who is the owner of the lorry, who entered appearance and filed his objections contending ..... no. 10 of 1990 is no longer a good law. the case before the apex court was under various provisions of andhra pradesh forest act which are in pari materia to the karnataka forest act, 1963. the question which came up for consideration in g.v. sudhakar rao's case, supra, was whether parallel proceedings before the magistrate and ..... b) if the vehicle is taken away by thieves and they were transporting forest produce, the owner cannot be held liable;(c) section 71-a of the karnataka forest act is not applicable in this case;(d) the alleged offence is compoundable. therefore, the order of confiscation is bad in law.4. i have heard the .....

Dr. B.N. Vadiraja Vs. Dr. Mumtaz Ahmed Khan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR3425; 2000(6)KarLJ474

..... be now seen whether the appeal filed by the present revision petitioner before the appellate tribunal under the provisions of section 94 of the karnataka education act, 1983 is maintainable in the absence of an order of dismissal or removal or reduction in rank of the petitioner, passed by the management ..... medical college is established and administered by an university established by law. the definition of private educational institution given in section 2(27) of the karnataka education act, 1983 is given as follows:' 'private educational institution' means any educational institution imparting education referred to in section, 3, established and administered ..... and institutions are dealt within.- the indian medical council act, 1956 (central act cii of 1956); the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (karnataka act 28 of 1976). thus section 1(3)(iv)(d) of the karnataka education act, 1983 makes it clear that the provisions of the act are not applicable in respect of the medical colleges .....

George Thomas Vs. K P Krishnappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... sustenance, so that their social status and level rises and they can also attain parity with other sections of the society. 107. in this background, karnataka act no.2 of 1979 while is a boon and is a gift given by the state, to members of these communities, should have worked to their ..... is saddled with the responsibility of foreseeing not only the administration of the district, but also being a statutory functionary under different enactments, including the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, and many other agrarian reformative legislations and in the instant case, under the very enactment, and many such other provisions of law, while ..... only a solace for such people, as rich and powerful can always find relief and solutions outside courts also! 106. karnataka scheduled caste and scheduled tribe [prohibition of transfer of certain lands] act, 1978, is undoubtedly a revolutionary piece of social welfare legislation, incorporating in itself the avowed object and purpose of article .....

S.V. Ramesh Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its Principal Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... law and consequently, framing of article of charges by the inquiring authority is illegal. 12. it is relevant to reproduce section 12 (3) and (4) of the karnataka lokayukta act, which reads hereunder:- 12(3). if, after investigation of any action (xxxx) involving an allegation has been made, the lokayukta or an upalokayukta is satisfied that such allegation ..... been examined. the decision is only conclusive. there is no material to show, examination of the report by the first respondent-government. when section 12(4) of karnataka lokayuktha act mandates i.e. shall examine , it was duty cast on first respondent to reveal how the report has been examined. from a reading of the impugned government order ..... of guilt against any delinquent and imposing the punishment for the same is a quasi-judicial function and not administrative one. (vide bachhittar singh v. state of punjab, air 1963 sc 395; union of india v. h.c. goel, air 1964 sc 364; mohd. yunus khan v. state of u.p., (2010) 10 scc 539; and .....