Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 71 results (0.865 seconds)

State of M.P. Vs. Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT33

..... while modifying the order of confiscation the appellate authority may by taking aid of sub-section (4) of section 52-a to pass an order of interim nature for custody preservation or disposal (if necessary) of the subject-matter of confiscation, as may appear to be just and proper in the circumstances of the case. or, in case, the appellate authority ..... and not as a matter of course as adopted by the revisional court. reliance is placed on the judgment rendered by the supreme court in the case of state of karnataka v. krishnan : 2000crilj3971 and section forester and anr. v. mansur ali khan : air2004sc1251 .6.the learned counsel for the respondent on his turn has supported the order passed by the .....

Bheraghat Mineral Industries Vs. Divisional Deputy Commissioner of Sal ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1992(61)ELT560(MP); [1990]79STC156(MP)

..... original fruit, the commodity continues to possess its original identity, notwithstanding the removal of inedible portions, the slicing and thereafter canning it on adding sugar to preserve it.'the following observation of the american supreme court in anheuser busch brewing association v. united states 52 l ed 336, has been quoted with approval :' ..... nothing more than wood cut up or sawn and would be timber. planks, beams and rafters would also be timber.'again, in sterling foods v. state of karnataka [1986] 63 stc 239, the supreme court has held :'processed or frozen shrimps, prawns and lobsters are commercially regarded the same commodity as raw shrimps, prawns ..... dissented from by another division bench in mohanlal vishram v. commissioner of sales tax [1969] 24 stc 101 (mp) holding that by felling standing timber trees, cutting trees and converting some of them into ballis, did not alter their character as timber or using them for the manufacture of 'other goods' within the meaning of .....

Sangeeta Bansal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... any action was taken for filling the said seat. further placing reliance in the case of mahadev govind gharge and others vs. special land acquisition officer, upper krishna project, jamkhandi, karnataka, (2011) 6 scc 321 , it is contended that the date of hearing is to be only when the court applies its mind and it should not be confused with the .....

Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh Vs. the State of Madhya P ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.9860/2012(S) Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh & otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.11083/2012(S) Devendra Kumar Tiwari -Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12298/2012(S) Arvind Kumar Upadhyay and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12302/2012(S) J.P.Soni and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.And. WRIT PETITION NO.22145/2012(S) Deepak Kumar Shrivastava and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. 2 Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Shri B.L.Nag, learned counsel for the interveners......[in W.P.No.9860/2012(S)].Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respond...

Smt. Madina Begum Vs. Shiv Murti Prasad Pandey

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... income tax (investigation) new delhi vs. pooran mall & sons, air 197.sc 67.wherein similar views have been expressed. all these judgments have been considered by the karnataka high court in the case of mahboob pasha (supra) and a complete reading of all these judgments would indicate that words used in the limitation act have to be ..... for specific performance of an agreement and on the grounds that in another suit, there was an injunction, the exclusion available under section 15 was sought for. the karnataka high court considered similar question and after relying upon a judgment rendered by the privy council in the case of narayan jivangouda vs. puttabai, air 194.pc 5 ..... privy council in the case of nagendranath (supra) and supreme court in the case of sunni central board of waqf u.p. (supra) to say that the karnataka high court under similar circumstances has interpreted section 15 (1) of the limitation act and similar contention as are advanced is upheld in these cases. he also submits .....

Ramniwas and Others Vs. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1747

..... 1963 would include sandalwood oil. this court in no uncertain terms held: (scc p. 99, paras 23-24) 23. the karnataka forest act is a special statute enacted for the purpose of preserving the forests and the forest produce in the state. the scheme of the act, as expressed in the sections, is to vest power ..... in the authorised officers of the forest department for proper implementation/enforcement of the statutory provisions and for enabling them to take effective steps for preserving the forests and forest produce. for this purpose, certain powers including the power of seizure, confiscation and forfeiture of the forest produce illegally removed from the ..... of lodging of appeal or about suo motu action, to the authorised officer. (4) the appellate authority may pass such order of interim nature for custody preservation or disposal (if necessary) of the subject matter of confiscation, as may appear to be just or proper in the circumstances of the case. (5) the appellate .....

Rameshwar NekhrA. Vs. the State Bar Council of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

1. The first mentioned of these two connected writ petitions being W.P. No. 6628/2011 has been filed by the present Chairman of the Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh. The second connected petition being Writ Petition No. 6372/2011 has been filed by a Member of the said Bar Council. Both the petitions have been filed for the same relief2 on virtually the same grounds. They have been heard together and are consequently being disposed of by this common order. Two broad questions have been raised (A) whether the Rule 122-A framed under section 15 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is ultra-vires, and (B) whether the second resolution (Annexure R/6 to the Bar Council’s return) dated 16-04-2011 in the meeting of the Bar Council is invalid. The relevant facts are given below.  2. Shri Rameshwar Neekhra was elected as a Member of the Madhya Pradesh State Bar Council in 2008. Shri Neekhra was elected as Chairman of the Bar Council by its members on 31.8.2008. 3. For prescribing (i) the manner of...

Smt. Mamta Shukla Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... or granted a permanent status in accordance with the provisions of madhya pradesh industrial relations act, 1960. 20. a constitutional bench of hon'ble supreme court in secretary, state of karnataka and others vs. umadevi and others, (2006) 4 scc 01 has held as under in regard to regularization and absorption of the daily wage employees. 47. when a person enters .....

ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union. Vs. the Director, Steel Authority of ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... . union territory, chandigarh and others air 2004 sc 969;workmen of nilgiri co- op.mkt. society ltd. vs. state of tamil nadu and others air 2004 sc 1639; state of karnataka & ors. vs. kgsd canteen employees welfare association & ors. air 2006 sc 845.26. there is yet another facet to the instant case. employment of the contract labour was prohibited by .....

Yograj Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Ssangyong Engineering Construction Ltd. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... of arbitral proceedings; or(ii) for an interim measure or protection in respect of any of the following matters, namely:-(a) the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement;(b) securing the amount in dispute in the arbitration;(c ..... guarantee. now thereof we syndicate bank, a body corporate constituted under banking companies acquisition and transfer of undertakings act 1970, having its head office at manipal, karnataka (india), and having a branch office amongst other places at nehru place new delhi-110019 (hereinafter called the "bank" which expression shall include its successors, ..... bank gurantee.now thereof we syndicate bank a body corporate constituted under banking companies acquisition and transfer of undertaking act 1970 having its head office at manipal karnataka (india) and having a branch office amongst other places at nehru place, new delhi-110019 (hereinafter called the "bank" which expression shall include its .....