Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Court: madhya pradesh Page 7 of about 71 results (0.111 seconds)

Tarun Sharma Son of Shri Deepak Sharma Vs. Vishwas Sarang Son of Shri ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... appointments. a number of countries forbid members of the legislature from accepting an office of profit under the executive as a means to secure the independence of the legislature and preserve the separation of powers. the english act of settlement 1701 and act of union 1707 are two early examples of this principle. the act of settlement provided that no person ..... to disqualification to fill the seat.34. at this juncture, it would be appropriate to take note of a decision of karnataka high court, authored by shivaraj patil, j. (as his lordship then was), in ramakrishna hegde v. state air 1993 karnataka 54. in that case, no evidence was placed in the court to show that any salary or pay scale was .....

M/S. Samta Construction Vs. Pawan Kumar Sharma and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(MP)405

..... immediate charge and control and not the final, absolute control of ownership, implying responsibility for the protection and preservation of the thing in custody. also the detainer of a man's persons by virtue of lawful process or authority.the term is very elastic and may mean ..... law dictionary, 6th edition, 'custody' has been described as under :-'the case and control of a thing or person. the keeping, guarding, care watch, inspection, preservation or security of a thing, carrying with it the idea of the thing being within the immediate personal care and control of the person whose custody it is subjected. ..... construction which would defeat its purpose and, in effect, obliterate it from the statute book, should be eshewed. if more than one construction is possible, that which preserves its workability, and efficacy is to be preferred to the one which would render it otiose or sterile.'11. in this regard it is worthwhile to refer to .....

Sarita Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1(1989)ACC121

..... in the cited decision. however, on going through the comparable cases, i find that the compensation awarded to the claimant is too low. in sanjiva shetty v. anantha air 1976 karnataka 146, the compensation of rs. 25,000/- was awarded. the appellant lost her leg which has resulted in permanent physical disability. it was observed that in such cases, the damages .....

Narmada Shankar and anr. Vs. the Collector, Dist. Dhar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1985MP115; 1985MPLJ444

..... . there cannot be any manner of doubt that persons belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes can be considered to be separate and distinct classes particularly in the matter of preservation and protection of their economic and educational interests. in view of the peculiar plight of these two classes the constitution in article 15(4) makes specific mention of these two .....

Lachiyabai Vs. Darshansingh Punjabi and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1(1989)ACC160

..... laid down by their lordships of the supreme court. true, it is that in a decision of a learned single judge of the karnataka high court in the case of adamkhan mohamed v. ramesh raya naik 1978 acj 409 (karnataka) the question of interest was raised and it was held that because the case was pending for a long time, the interest .....

Nabab Khan Alias Nawab and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2004CriLJ94

..... palanisamy v. state of tamil nadu, air 1986 sc 593 : (1986 cri lj 551), state of orissa v. brahmananda nanda, air 1976 sc 2488 : (1976 cri lj 1985), state of karnataka v. babu, air 1994 sc 31 : (1994 cri lj 18), kishan chand v. state of punjab, air 1994 sc 32 : (1994 cri lj 19), daljeet singh v. state of punjab .....

Raghu Thakur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1997MP223

..... .m. for serving the house for 5 years. in excess of 5 years, additional pension @ rs. 50/- p.m. up to the maximum limit of rs. 1200/- per month. (9) karnataka (a) pension every person who has served after january 1952 for a term of 5 years as mla/mlc is entitled to pension of rs. 1,200/- and additional sum .....

Sangeeta Bansal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... any action was taken for filling the said seat. further placing reliance in the case of mahadev govind gharge and others vs. special land acquisition officer, upper krishna project, jamkhandi, karnataka, (2011) 6 scc 321 , it is contended that the date of hearing is to be only when the court applies its mind and it should not be confused with the .....

Smt. Madina Begum Vs. Shiv Murti Prasad Pandey

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... income tax (investigation) new delhi vs. pooran mall & sons, air 197.sc 67.wherein similar views have been expressed. all these judgments have been considered by the karnataka high court in the case of mahboob pasha (supra) and a complete reading of all these judgments would indicate that words used in the limitation act have to be ..... for specific performance of an agreement and on the grounds that in another suit, there was an injunction, the exclusion available under section 15 was sought for. the karnataka high court considered similar question and after relying upon a judgment rendered by the privy council in the case of narayan jivangouda vs. puttabai, air 194.pc 5 ..... privy council in the case of nagendranath (supra) and supreme court in the case of sunni central board of waqf u.p. (supra) to say that the karnataka high court under similar circumstances has interpreted section 15 (1) of the limitation act and similar contention as are advanced is upheld in these cases. he also submits .....

Ramniwas and Others Vs. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1747

..... 1963 would include sandalwood oil. this court in no uncertain terms held: (scc p. 99, paras 23-24) 23. the karnataka forest act is a special statute enacted for the purpose of preserving the forests and the forest produce in the state. the scheme of the act, as expressed in the sections, is to vest power ..... in the authorised officers of the forest department for proper implementation/enforcement of the statutory provisions and for enabling them to take effective steps for preserving the forests and forest produce. for this purpose, certain powers including the power of seizure, confiscation and forfeiture of the forest produce illegally removed from the ..... of lodging of appeal or about suo motu action, to the authorised officer. (4) the appellate authority may pass such order of interim nature for custody preservation or disposal (if necessary) of the subject matter of confiscation, as may appear to be just or proper in the circumstances of the case. (5) the appellate .....