Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka panchayat raj act 1993 section 251 transmission of accounts Page 47 of about 515 results (0.248 seconds)

Jul 04 2007 (HC)

Laxmipathi Vs. the Deputy Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2007Kant173; 2007(5)KarLJ342; 2007(5)AIRKarR342; AIR2007Kant173

..... the main grievance of the petitioner is that as per the impugned notification, the reservation for the post of adhyaksha for the kondadahalli grama panchayat is made in favour of scheduled caste which would in effect result in reservation being made in favour of woman candidate. ..... the present reservation in respect of the grama panchayat in question is made in favour of a scheduled caste candidate for the post of adhyaksha. ..... the petitioner is challenging the notification dated 27-11-2006 produced vide annexure-h issued by the deputy commissioner, davanagere, notifying the reservation in favour of different categories for the post of adhyaksha and upadhyaksha in respect of different grama panchayats coming within chennagiri taluk of davanagere district.2. ..... out of the elected members of the panchayat, a lone candidate who is elected as scheduled caste candidate is a lady and if the post of adhyaksha is reserved in favour of scheduled caste candidate, it will necessarily go in favour of a woman which tantamounts to again reserving the post in favour of a woman candidate is ..... it is not in dispute that the post of adhyaksha has not been reserved in favour of scheduled caste candidates all these years in this panchayat. ..... siddappa drawing the attention of the court to annexure-j the order dated 3-3-2005 issued by the state election commission submits that there cannot be reservation in favour of a woman candidate for successive periods in respect of a grama panchayat.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 1972 (HC)

i.B. Hebballi Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1972]30STC38(Kar)

..... in view of the fact that the detected turnover is not contained in regularly maintained books of accounts, there is scope to believe that there are transactions outside those note books also which the department is not able to detect. ..... this is a revision petition preferred by the assessee under the mysore sales tax act, 1957, and it relates to the period 19th november, 1963, to 4th november, 1964. 2. ..... he found that the returns submitted and the accounts produced were incomplete and unreliable. ..... (1) sales as per account books 79,541.15 (2) add local sales detected as per the note book 39,665.52 (3) add inter-state sales detected from bank accounts in the names of f. b. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1982 (HC)

Sanna Eranna Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1983KAR565; 1983(1)KarLJ115

..... information and after such inquiry as he thinks necessary, has reason to believe that any place is used for the deposit or sale of stole property, or for the deposit, sale or production of any objectionable article to which this section applies, or that any such objectionable article is deposited in any place may by warrant authorise any police officer above the rank of a constable (a) to enter, with such assistance as may be required, such place; (b) to search the same ..... 196 of the karnataka land revenue act and also under s. ..... , before the magistrate alleging that the petitioners herein have committed offences under sections 451, 448, 380 and 352 read with s. 34 i.p.c. ..... , 22-4-1982 on which day he examined the complainant and two witnesses and thereafter came to the conclusion that offences under sections 451 and 380 read with s. 34 i.p.c. ..... thereafter he came to the conclusion that offences under sections 451 and 380 read with s. 34 i.p.c. ..... at this stage sri kuranga submitted that the accused have acted in the discharge of their official duty as government servants and therefore there is prohibition under s. ..... a perusal of the impugned order does not disclose that he has reason to believe that any place is used for the deposit or sale of stolen property as contemplated in the said section. ..... , in which even prior permission of the government is necessary and hence no prosecution lies against the public servants in respect of the acts done in good faith. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1986 (HC)

Mahantaswamy and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2970

..... me to have illicit connection with him and in this connection letters were received and mahantaswami felt that a case might be filed against him on informing the police and she refused to compromise with mahantaswami and on account of this he got committed the incident in this fashion at the hands of shekaraiah and andappa sobigana and by the above mentioned persons. ..... 1 to 38 and some others, prepared various mahazars and collected medical certificates and ultimately placed a charge sheet for the offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 324, 354, 355, 341, 448, 342, 109 read with s. ..... therefore the order passed by the magistrate proposing to frame a charge against a-16 for the offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 324, 354, 355, 341, 448, 342, 109 read with s. ..... the magistrate has proposed to frame a charge against a-1 to a-18 for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 324, 354, 355, 341, 448, 342, 109 read with s. ..... read as :- 'if, upon considering the police report and the documents sent with it under section 173 and making such examination, if any, of the accused as the magistrate thinks necessary and after giving the prosecution and the accused an opportunity of being heard, the magistrate considers the charge against the ..... the charges against all the accused persons 1 to 18 for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 324, 354, 355, 341, 448, 342, 109 read with s. ..... 251(a)(2) of the cr.p.c. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 1988 (HC)

S.R. Anjan Setty Vs. Government of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1989(1)KarLJ95

..... of petitioner is that non-issue of a show cause notice as per section 6(b) of the essential commodities act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') vitiates the impugned order of confiscation (annexure-b) and of the appellate order ..... - (1) no order confiscating any essential commodity, package, covering receptacle, animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance shall be made under section 6a, unless the owner of such essential commodity, package, covering receptacle, animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance of the persons from whom it is seized - (a) is given a notice in writing informing him of the ..... 35 kgs, by the petitioner, without possessing necessary licence under the karnataka edible oil seeds licensing order, 1977 and produced the seized commodity ..... confiscation of essential commodity :- (1) where any essential commodity is seized in pursuance of an order made under section 3 in relation thereto, a report of such seizure shall, without unreasonable delay, be made to the collector of the district of the presidency town in which such essential commodity is seized and whether or ..... of licence on 27-5-85 the respondent has taken this to account and to the stock register maintained as per the conditions ..... holding that there was no justification to hoard essential commodities (edible oil seeds) in anticipation of grant of licence and storing of edible oils exceeding 30 quintals without licence contravened karnataka edible oil seeds dealers licensing order, 1977 ordered confiscation. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1989 (HC)

A. Ramesh Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1695; 1989(1)KarLJ207

..... - (1) in any local area to which the government by notification in the official gazette from time to time extends this sub-section or any clause thereof, whoever, contrary thereto, - xx xx xx xx xx (r) uses in any street any threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour or posts up or affixes or exhibits any indecent, threatening, abusive or insulting paper or drawing with intent to provoke a breach of the ..... 92 of the karnataka police act, 1963, for short the 'act'. 2. ..... 92(1)(r) of the karnataka police act and, therefore, the learned metropolitan magistrate has committed an error in taking cognizance of the petty case charge sheet filed against the petitioner and ordering issue of summons to him. 12 ..... 37255/88 on the file of the metropolitan magistrate, traffic court, mayohall, bangalore, for an offence under clause (r) of sub-section (1) of s. ..... that can be made out from the said banner is that an appeal is made to the chief minister to immediately stop the high handed acts of sub-inspector lavakumar. ..... 2(20) of the act, includes any highway, bridge, way over a causeway, via duct, arch, quay or wharf or any road, lane, footway, square, court, alley or passage accessible to the public whether a thoroughfare or ..... 92(1) of the act and, therefore, the learned metropolitan magistrate has committed an illegality in taking cognizance of such a complaint and ordering issue of summons to the petitioner. ..... 92(1) of the act and submitted that even if the entire allegations made in column .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1998 (HC)

Alban D'Souza Vs. the Land Tribunal, Udupi and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR243; 1999(1)KarLJ209

..... section 2-a(18) of the karnataka land reforms act defines 'land' to mean the land which is used or capable of being used for agricultural purposes or purposes subservient thereto and includes garden land. ..... he being a resident of bombay cannot be a mulgeni tenant of the lands as claimed by him as the lands are situated in udupi in karnataka state. ..... in view of the definition of 'land' in the act and the trees and other malkies found by the land tribunal at the time of spot inspection, it cannot be said that the lands were non-agricultural lands and the contention that the land tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2005 (HC)

Guthyappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR1268; 2005(2)KarLJ100

..... proceedings in the record would substantiate the act of the respondent. ..... 15013 of 1993. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1993 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Saraswathi Education Society

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR862; 1993(2)KarLJ12

..... in almost every case before us, we found that impugned orders were made in similar manner; wordings are substantially similar and it is clear that the state government acted mechanically in making these orders, without making any effort to give the basic facts needed to support its conclusions.15. ..... the state government is directed to consider the application of the petitioner afresh on or before 30th april 1993, after affording an opportunity to the petitioner to place further material, if any. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2001 (HC)

Y.C. Susheela Devi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2001Kant489; 2002(3)KarLJ413

..... -chief controlling revenue authority passed the impugned order at annexure-f, dated 28-12-1994 holding that the document is a partition deed under article 39(c) of the karnataka stamp act, 1957 and ordered to pay the deficit stamp duty on the instrument presented for its registration. ..... it is contended that the document in question falls under section 2(1)(k) of the act and hence it is a partition deed, justifying the payment of deficit stamp duty amount and levy of penalty, respondents have prayed for dismissal of the ..... did not follow the procedure prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 39 of the act but referred the document for determination under section 53 of the act to first respondent. ..... first point, the sub-registrar has impounded the document presented for registration under section 33 of the act and referred to the 2nd respondent under section 37(2) of the act. ..... reference made by the 3rd respondent for determination of category of the document under section 37(2) of the act is legal and valid? ..... the aforesaid law, it has to be held that the decree passed by the civil court based on the award of the arbitrator has to be construed as an instrument falling under article 40-b(b) of the act and it cannot be treated as a partition deed under section 2(1)(k) falling under article 39 of the act. ..... by an order dated 20-4-1993 the civil court referred the matter to sole arbitrator with a direction to submit an award ..... 14 of 1993 was filed on the file of additional city civil .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //