Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka panchayat raj act 1993 section 251 transmission of accounts Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 56 results (0.272 seconds)

Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... development plan: every corporation shall prepare every year a development plan and submit to the district planning committee constituted under section 310 of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993, or as the case may be the metropolitan planning committee constituted under section 503b of this act.503-b. ..... comprising the city of bangalore as defined in the city of bangalore municipal corporation act, 1949 (karnataka act 69 of 1949), the areas where the city of bangalore improvement act, 1945 (karnataka act 5 of 1945) was immediately before the commencement of this act in force and such other areas adjacent to the aforesaid as the government may from time to time by notification specify.clause (j) of section 2 of the bda act defines 'development' as follows: 'development' with its grammatical variations means the carrying ..... . in such a case, relief can be granted not on the ground that there has been discrimination, but on the ground that the proposed development scheme became non- existent on account of most of the lands being deleted from acquisition.therefore, a land owner is not entitled to seek deletion of his land from acquisition, merely on the ground that lands of some others ..... of the said notification shall be sent to the corporation which shall, within thirty days from the date of receipt thereof, forward to the authority for transmission to the government as hereinafter provided, any representation which the corporation may think fit to make with regard to the scheme. .....

Widia (India) Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3095; 2003(5)ALD110(SC); JT2003(7)SC237; 2003(6)SCALE567; (2003)8SCC22; [2003]132STC360(SC)

..... panchayat and nyaya panchayats act, 1983 (karnataka act 20 of 1985) and panchayat area under the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993 (karnataka act 14 of 1993 ..... writ petitions, government of karnataka in exercise of its power under section 3(1) of the act reads with section 21 of the mysore general clauses act, 1899, by issuing notification ..... be covered by the definition provided under section 2(a)(5) of the act, which defines 'local area' to mean:--''local area' means an area within the limits of a city under the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976 (karnataka act 14 of 1977) a municipality under the karnataka municipality act, 1964 (karnataka act 22 of 1964) a notified area committee, a town board, a sanitary board or a cantonment board constitute or continued under any law for the time being in force and a mandal under the karnataka zila parishads, taluk panchayat samithis. ..... to clarify the situation, it can be stated that a subsequent notification issued in exercise of the powers conferred under the said section may in some case amount to restriction to free trade and commerce but simplicitor addition of the words 'retrospectively or prospectively' would not require sanction of the president as contemplated under ..... the government of karnataka in exercise of its power under section 3(1) of the act brought out notification dated 30.3.1994, which came into effect on 1st april, 1994 levying tax on the entry of goods brought into a local area from any place outside the state for .....

Bharati Reddy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the zilla panchayat are elected in accordance with section 177 of the karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act, 1993 and rule 7 of karnataka panchayat raj (election of adhyaksha and upadhyaksha of zilla panchayat) rules, 1994. ..... learned single judge also referred to rule 7 of the karnataka panchayat raj (election of adhyaksha and upadhyaksha of zilla panchayat) 3 rules, 1994 providing for the filing of the election petition before the jurisdictional district judge by an ..... this constitution- the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or allotment of seats to such constituencies made or purporting to be made under article 243k, shall not be called in question in any court; (b) no election to any panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the legislature of a state. 9. ..... a bare reading of sub-section (b) of article 243-o would show that election to any panchayat cannot be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the legislature of ..... learned senior counsel, the question for consideration was maintainability of an election petition presented by a candidate challenging the election to the office of the president of india who has not been duly nominated under section 14a of the presidential and vice-presidential elections act, 1952. .....

Seema Sarkar Vs. Executive Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... for, the high court considered the specific provisions contained in the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993 and construed them to mean that they expressly exclude the right to participate in the proceedings and vote on a no confidence motion against the adhyaksha or up adhyaksha. ..... the observations in the said decision, therefore, are contextual and in reference to the express provision in the karnataka panchayat raj act in the 36 form of sections 120(2), 140(3), 159(2) and 179(3). ..... (4) the provisions of sub sections (5),(6),(7) and (8) of section 11 shall so far as may be apply to the panchayat samiti as 19 they apply to a gram panchayat subject to the modification that for the words gram panchayat wherever they occur, the words panchayat samiti had been substituted. ..... rule 9(3)(b) stipulates that two thirds of the total membership of a panchayat samiti shall be a sufficient quorum for a special meeting of the panchayat samiti in reference to section 117(1) of the regulation to move a motion of no confidence against the pramukh or up pramukh. ..... from the legislative scheme it is noticed that as and when the special meeting to consider the no confidence motion proceeds, section 117(2) mandates that the motion may be treated as carried out only if a majority of not less than two thirds of the total number of members of the panchayat samiti vote in favour of removal of the pramukh or up pramukh, as the case may be. .....

Bharati Reddy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... been issued by the state government in exercise of powers conferred under section 2(2) of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993, for classifying and notifying the classes of citizens as backward class, for the purpose of reservation of seats and office of chairperson in zilla panchayat, taluk panchayat and gram panchayat. ..... rule 7 of the karnataka panchayat raj rules explicitly envisages that only a member of the panchayat may challenge the validity of the election of ..... in that case, the court after analysing the factual matrix found, as of fact, that there was non-compliance of sub-section (5) of section 85 of the electricity act, 2003, in the matter of appointment of the incumbent to the post of chairperson of the commission for which it became necessary to issue a ..... of caste and income certificate; on 26.04.2016 the revenue inspector has submitted a report recommending to issue caste certificate to the petitioner in backward caste ii(b); revenue inspector had conducted mahazar along with the village accountant and opined that there is no objection for issue of caste certificate to the petitioner in backward caste ii(b); statement of smt. c. ..... the objectives of democratic decentralisation are not only to bring governance closer to the people, but also to make it more participatory, inclusive and accountable to the weaker sections of society. ..... annexure-e dated 06.2.2016) itself she has stated that she is an income tax assessee and has even furnished pan (permanent account number). .....

State of Karnataka Vs. L. Shivanna and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

the text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedcivil appeal no. 277 1993 was dismissed as withdrawn and in civil appeal no. 276 1993 it was held that the high court had interpreted section 139 of the karnataka zila parishad, taluk panchayat samithis, mandal panchayats and nyaya panchayats act, 1983 which was repealed by karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993. the appeal was dismissed.

Vikas Kishanrao Gawali Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in respect of the objections against the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993, all that we can refer to is the chinnappa reddy commission report (1990) which reflects the position as ..... made subject to the outcome of these writ petitions including so notified in the concerned election programme issued by the state election 33 commission, are declared as non est in law and the vacancy of seat(s) caused on account of this declaration be forthwith filled up by the state election commission with general/open candidate(s) for the remainder term of the concerned local bodies, by issuing notification in that regard.26. as a consequence of this declaration ..... these writ petitions under article 32 of the constitution of india seek a declaration that section 12(2)(c) of the maharashtra zilla parishads and panchayat samitis act, 19611, is ultra vires the 1 for short, the 1961 act 2 provisions of articles 243 d and 243 t including articles 14 and 16 of ..... needless to 8 (1) the maharashtra village panchayats act, 1959 section 10(2)(c) (2) maharashtra municipal councils, nagar panchayats and industrial townships act, 1965 sections 9(2)(d) and 341(b)(4) (3) the maharashtra municipal corporations act, 1949 section 5a(1)(c) 32 observe that the view taken in this judgment would apply with full force to the interpretation and application of the provisions of the stated act(s) and the state authorities must immediately move into action to take corrective and follow up measures in right earnest including .....

Avtar Singh Hit Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2006(9)SC111; 2006(10)SCALE271; (2006)8SCC487; 2006(2)LC1375(SC)

..... ramanjaneyullu : (1998)8scc703 is a case relating to election under the andhra pradesh panchayat raj act and in a short judgment it was observed that the main question for decision being the non-compliance of a provision of the act which is a ground for an election petition in rule 12 framed under the act, the writ petition under article 226 of the constitution should not have been entertained for this purpose.in ashok kumar jain v. ..... the appellant challenged the rejection of the nomination paper by filing a writ petition in the high court which was dismissed on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to interfere with the order of the returning officer on account of article 329(b) of the constitution, which says that no election to either house of parliament or to the house or either house of the legislature of a state shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as ..... (2) the provisions of section 5 and 12 of the limitation act, 1963, shall, so far as may be, apply to appeals under this section.sections 15 to 20 of the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the dmc act') provide for resolution of disputes regarding elections by filing an election petition. ..... , under the karnataka cooperative societies act, wherein the high court in a writ petition under article 226 of the constitution set aside the order by which the nomination of the first respondent therein was rejected. .....

Uttar Pradeshgram Panchayat Adhikari Sangh and ors. Vs. Daya Ram Saroj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1289(SC); 2006(13)SCALE442; (2007)2SCC138; 2007(2)SLJ451(SC)

..... panchayat raj act 1947 were substituted by new sections ..... provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon panchayats, subject to conditions as may be specified, with respect to the implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the eleventh schedule of the constitution.to implement the 73rd constitution amendment, the uttar pradesh panchayat raj act 1947 (u.p. ..... panchayat raj act, 1947 as amended in ..... (6)the prescribed authority may, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, transfer any employee referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) from one gram panchayat to any other gram panchayat within the same district and the state government or such other officer as may be empowered in this behalf by the state government may similarly transfer any such employee ..... such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon panchayats, at the appropriate level, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to - (a) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;(b) the implementation of schemes for economic development and ..... the teeth and the guidelines of the constitution bench judgment in secretary, state of karnataka and ors. v. ..... amendment) act, 1992 came into force on 24.4.1993. .....

Dr. Premachandran Keezhoth Vs. The Chancellor Kannur University

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... chairman, karnataka state higher education council (former vice chancellor, bangalore university & karnataka state rural development and panchayat raj university 3 ..... dated 27.10.2021 reads thus: page 4 of 72 i) notification dated 27.10.2021 constituting the selection committee no.g53 1283/2021 governors secretariat kerala raj bhavan thiruvananthapuram 27th october 2021 notification in exercise of the powers conferred under section 10, read with sub sections (1)(2) and (3) of the kannur university act, 1996, the chancellor of the university is pleased to constitute a selection committee comprising of the following members to make recommendation (s) towards ..... the legislature intentionally makes such a distinction, the same must also be interpreted distinctly, and while dealing with the case of the vice-chancellor, the governor, being the chancellor of the university, acts only in his personal capacity, and therefore, the powers and duties exercised and performed by him under a statute related to the university, as its chancellor, have absolutely no relation to the ..... taking into account the factual and legal circumstances deliberated above, we are of the clear and considered opinion that the appellants have not made out any case of ..... scc (l&s) 1128 : (1993) 25 atc464 was pleased to hold that the evaluation of the comparative merits of the candidates would not be gone into a public interest litigation and only in a proceeding initiated ..... 1993) 4 scc119:1993 ..... (1993 ..... 1993) 4 scc119:1993 ..... 1993 .....