Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka land reforms act 1961 section 139 removal of difficulties Page 3 of about 1,355 results (0.576 seconds)

Ningappa (Deceased) by L.Rs. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR978; 2000(2)KarLJ554

..... :(a) the father of the petitioners the aforesaid ningappa filed form no. 7 seeking registration of occupancy right in respect of the land, referred to above, as provided under section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). during the pendency of the proceedings before the tribunal, the father of the petitioners expired. however, the mother of the petitioners ..... of the village office. thirdly, he submitted that the impugned order came to be passed without conducting an enquiry as prescribed under rule 17 of the karnataka land reforms rules read with section 34 of the karnataka land revenue act. he also pointed out that when the father of the petitioners had expired, the tribunal was duty-bound to give notice to all the legal heirs .....

Jadiyappa and Others Vs. Land Tribunal Represented by Its Chairman and ...

Court : Karnataka

..... db) (b.r. ganganna gowda (since dead) by lrs. vs state of karnataka and others, wherein it has been held as under: "karnataka land reforms act, 1961, section 48-a - grant of occupancy right - suit instituted before karnataka land reforms act came into force by tenant against landlord for injunction restraining landlord from interference with his ..... tenant and confirmed its earlier order - tenant filed lra before land reforms appellate authority - matter transferred to high court - high court held applicant not a tenant of land - tenant challenged order in appeal - held - before the karnataka land reforms act came into force the competent civil court has negatived the ..... appeal - appeal dismissed - tenant filed second appeal which was also dismissed - when karnataka land reforms act come into existence he filed application in form 7 before land tribunal claiming to be a tenant of the same land which was subject-matter of earlier round of litigation - tribunal granted occupancy rights in .....

Jadiyappa and Others Vs. Land Tribunal Represented by Its Chairman and ...

Court : Karnataka

..... db) (b.r. ganganna gowda (since dead) by lrs. vs state of karnataka and others, wherein it has been held as under: "karnataka land reforms act, 1961, section 48-a - grant of occupancy right - suit instituted before karnataka land reforms act came into force by tenant against landlord for injunction restraining landlord from interference with his ..... tenant and confirmed its earlier order - tenant filed lra before land reforms appellate authority - matter transferred to high court - high court held applicant not a tenant of land - tenant challenged order in appeal - held - before the karnataka land reforms act came into force the competent civil court has negatived the ..... appeal - appeal dismissed - tenant filed second appeal which was also dismissed - when karnataka land reforms act come into existence he filed application in form 7 before land tribunal claiming to be a tenant of the same land which was subject-matter of earlier round of litigation - tribunal granted occupancy rights in .....

Moodabidri Gurugala Basadi Vs. Anantaraja Indira and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... the case are that respondent no.1 had filed form no.7 seeking grant of occupancy rights of land bearing sy. no.53/4b measuring 64 cents in pranthya village, karkala taluk, dakshina kannada district, on the enforcement of the amendments made to karnataka land reforms act, 1961. before the tribunal, one b. nagakumara shetty and charukeerthi pandithacharyavarya swami, administrator of pashwarnathadevara bhandara, were arrayed ..... as respondents. the latter, which is a mutt / basadi is the petitioner in this civil petition. before the land tribunal, the mutt / basadi was represented by one sri bhaskar bhat, who .....

Yallawwa Kuri and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(1)KarLJ560

..... lands on the basis of agreement of sale and lease. when these admitted facts as it reveals from the documentary evidence available on record ..... -1963 or 1-7-1970 or 1-3-1974 name of the deceased petitioner was not found as having cultivating the said lands as tenant. as a matter of fact, when he has filed form 7 under section 45 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, for registering the occupancy rights, he himself has declared that, he is cultivating the said ..... ink page no. 7, i.e., form 7 filed by the deceased sri gundappa on 12-12-1975, land tribunal after conducting enquiry as per rule 17 of the karnataka land reforms rules, 1974 read with section 34 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 and in view of the admission made by the first petitioner that she is not cultivating the said .....

Honnamma and ors. Vs. Nanjundaiah Since Dead by His Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC2076; 2008(4)KarLJ385; 2008(6)SCALE222

..... are as under:3. one nanjundegowda since deceased filed an application on 2nd january. 1976 before the land tribunal, nagamangala in form no. 7 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'act') claiming occupancy rights on specified surveys numbers in village anakanahalli. he thereafter filed an application on ..... 8th april, 1981 seeking to amend form no. 7 on the plea that some of the survey numbers given therein had not been correctly re-produced. this application was straightaway allowed by the land ..... claim. this order was challenged by nanjundegowda by way of a writ petition but on the constitution of the land reforms appellate authority by an amendment of the act, the writ petition was remitted to the appellate authority for disposal. the appellate authority crystallized the points for .....

The State of Karnataka Rep. by Revenue Secretary, Vs. H.B. Munivenkata ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ439; ILR2007(2)Kar1893; 2007(4)KLJ439; 2007(3)KCCR1959; 2007(3)AIRKarR288

..... submitted that no separate ledger is maintained by the tahsildar office for receiving the applications filed under the provisions of the inams abolition act. all the applications filed either under the karnataka land reforms act or under the provisions of the inams abolition act are entered in the same ledger book. the relevant entry shows that h.b. munivenkatappa has filed an application which is found ..... its order has categorically stated that munivenkatappa has filed an application in form no. 7 under section 48-a(1) of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 before the land tribunal, bangalore south taluk requesting for registration of occupancy rights in respect of land in sy. no. 15 (old) and 54 (new) of patandur agrahara village, k.r. puram hobli, bangalore south taluk. the recitals in .....

Seetharamiah Vs. Land Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR975

ordermalimath, c.j.1. the appellants had presented applications under section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as 'the act,), to the land tribunal for grant of occupancy rights in their favour in respect of certain lands. the land tribunal having rejected their applications,the appellants challenged the order of the tribunal in writ petitions nos. 4891,15819 and 15819 and 15820/79 ..... chairman himself, the recording of such statements must, in our opinion, be regarded as made by the chairman himself as contemplated by section 34 of the karnataka land revenue act read with rule 17 of the karnataka land reforms rules. in this case we aresatisfied having regard to the nature of the averments and the records that what has been recorded as the summary of the .....

Shri Dharmarayaswamy Temple Vs. Chinnathayappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR4242

..... -1965. the act was in execution of the policy of agrarian reforms and was intended to give ownership of the land to the actual lawful tiller and to avoid absentee ..... the ground that they were tenants cultivating the lands as on the appointed date under that act and therefore entitled to the grant of occupancy rights. in order to appreciate the claim made by the respondents, under the land reforms act, it is necessary to make a brief survey of that act. the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, came into force on 2-10 ..... , bangalore north taluk allowing the applications filed by respondents-1 to 10 under section 48-a(1) of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 and granting them occupancy rights in respect of land in sy. no. 79 of neelasandra village, bangalore north taluk.2. the brief facts of the case and the history of the .....

C. Hanumanthappa S/O. Chinnappa Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ394; ILR2007(2)Kar1845; 2007(3)KCCRSN124; 2007(3)AIRKarR510;

..... from dairy farming and poultry farming. definitely, agriculture industries does not fall within the ambit of definition of agriculture under karnataka land reforms act of 1974. the order of conversion does not indicate bifurcation of 7 acres of land for the said three uses, i.e. agriculture industry, poultry farming and dairy farming. this would only mean there ..... petitioner in w.p. 22437/01 was a tenant in respect of sy.no. 33/2 of hosakerehalli village of bangalore, as contemplated under karnataka land reforms act of 1974? and2. whether mr. hanumanthappa is entitled for grant of occupancy rights in respect of entire 10 acres of ..... at all the order of conversion issued by a statutory authority under karnataka land revenue act is to be questioned, land tribunal under land reforms act, cannot go into the question of validity of such conversion. it has to be challenged only before the appropriate authority under the land revenue act in normal course. but we have a different situation here, by .....