Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1987KAR1427
..... onwards down till to-day.34. the learned counsel sri mandagi drew my attention to the definition of the word 'agriculture' given in section 2(1) of the karnataka land reforms act, which reads, as--'agriculture includes :(a) horticulture ;(b) the raising of crops, grass or garden product ;(c) dairy farming ;(d) poultry farming ;(e) ..... , 1959 mys. l.j 932 will not be an authority while finding out the scope of revision while deciding the case under section 121a of the karnataka land reforms act.15. shri mandagi then referred to v. ramachandra ayyar and anr. v. ramalingam chettiar and anr., : [1963]3scr604 in elaboration of his contention ..... court perpetuating the unjust and incorrect order passed by the lower courts therefore after perusing section 121a of the karnataka land reforms act and the similar provision contained in section 50 of the karnataka rent control act and after reading it in comparison with section 115 of the civil procedure code and after taking into consideration the purpose .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1992KAR1827; 1992(3)KarLJ258
..... rank of an assistant commissioner' shall be substituted: (b) after clause (14), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:- '(15) 'tribunal' means a tribunal constituted under section 48 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961': (2) in section 9 - (a) in sub-section (i), for the words 'deputy commissioner', the word 'tribunal' shall be substituted: (b) in sub-section (2) (a) in clause (a ..... rank of an assistant commissioner' shall be substituted: (b) after clause (15), the following clause shall be inserted, namely: '(16) 'tribunal' means a tribunal constituted under section 48 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961': (2) in section 10 (a) in the heading for the figures, letters and words '9 and 9a', the word and figures 'and 9' shall be substituted: (b) sub-section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1992KAR247; 1991(4)KarLJ125
..... is an agriculturist or not. this conclusion gets fortified by the duties of the tribunal enumerated in section 112b of the karnataka land reforms act. therefore it is obvious that the tribunal constituted under the karnataka land reforms act has no jurisdiction to decide this question whether a person is an agriculturist or not.12. confronted with this argument sri ..... to make such a declaration in his general power or inherent power.13. keeping in view the definitions in the b.t. & a.l. act and the karnataka land reforms act, it appears to me that the law laid down by the supreme court in : [1979]2scr586 does not in any way alter the legal position ..... has formulated this question treating it a substantial question of law that arises for consideration in this second appeal.7. so far as the provisions of the karnataka land reforms act applicable to a suit of specific performance of contract is concerned, it is no longer res integra. in shivannappa sidramappa prantur v. virupaxappa allappa bagi, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1995KAR2111; 1995(3)KarLJ306
..... 44. here, the question for consideration is whether there is a conflict in the two provisions of law namely section 47 of the indian registration act and section 44 of karnataka land reforms act and if there is a conflict which will prevail? no doubt, section 47 provides that the deed which has been registered, it shall have effect ..... 4.86, passed by the divisional commissioner, mysore. the matter was remanded to the tribunal, with a direction to await the proceedings under section-15 of the karnataka land reforms act, which had been remanded to the tahsildar. according to the petitioner's case, the tahsildar by order dated 21.3.94 directed the petitioner to deliver the ..... coming into picture of w.p.33042/92, it appears that respondent no. 3 issued a notice purporting to be under section 15(2) of the karnataka land reforms act 1961 to the father of the petitioner namely to late mundappa poojary. that subsequently on 23.12.85, without having moved an application under section 15(4) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2002(6)KarLJ27
..... estate'.2. the prayer in the present writ petition is to declare section 110 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (in short, the 'land reforms act') and the roerich and devikarani roerich estate (acquisition and transfer) act, 1996 (in short, the 'acquisition act') as unconstitutional and also to quash the gazette notification, dated 18-3-1994 issued by ..... the parliament since they damage the basic or essential features of the constitution or its basic structure'.16. in the present case, admittedly, the karnataka land reforms act was placed in the ninth schedule to the constitution in 1964 and there-fore, the law laid down by the supreme court in his holiness ..... . rd 217 lra 93, bangalore, dated 8th march, 1994in exercise of the powers conferred by section 110 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (karnataka act 10 of 1962), the government of karnataka hereby directs that the land used for cultivation of linaloe referred to in clause (vi) of sub-section (1) of section 107 of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1990KAR4242
..... -1965. the act was in execution of the policy of agrarian reforms and was intended to give ownership of the land to the actual lawful tiller and to avoid absentee ..... the ground that they were tenants cultivating the lands as on the appointed date under that act and therefore entitled to the grant of occupancy rights. in order to appreciate the claim made by the respondents, under the land reforms act, it is necessary to make a brief survey of that act. the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, came into force on 2-10 ..... , bangalore north taluk allowing the applications filed by respondents-1 to 10 under section 48-a(1) of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 and granting them occupancy rights in respect of land in sy. no. 79 of neelasandra village, bangalore north taluk.2. the brief facts of the case and the history of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2007(1)KarSN2; 2007(2)KLJ547; 2007(2)KCCRSN69; 2007(2)KCCR1213; 2007(1)AIRKarR497; AIR2007NOC429
..... no specific pleading or question was raised in the courts below to the effect that the proposed agreement is hit by section 80 of the karnataka land reforms act. undoubtedly, a reading of section 9 would indicate what are the defences available to the executant. insofar as the said provision is concerned, ..... executed by the defendants, the plaintiffs have sought permission from the competent authority for conversion and that has been granted. consequently, section 80 of the karnataka land reforms act cannot be invoked in the present set of circumstances.13. regarding redlines and willingness:insofar as the first substantial question of law regarding readiness and ..... the plaintiffs were always ready and willing to perform their part of the contract and that the agreement to sell is not prohibited under the karnataka land reforms act.9. mr. raghavendra rao, learned counsel appearing for the defendants elaborating his submissions on the two substantial questions of law would contend that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2009(1)KCCRSN14:2009(4)AIRKarR21.
..... tribunal was empowered to decide whether a person is a tenant or not.repelling the contention on behalf of the respondent that section 133 of the karnataka land reforms act excluded the jurisdiction of the civil court in suits for possession where the defendant claimed to be a tenant as utterly unsound this court held ..... v. fakirappa bharmappa machenahalli and ors. : [1978]3scr789 , dealing with the question concerning the civil court's jurisdiction being barred under section 133 of the karnataka land reforms act, the appex court has observed thus in paras- 39 and 40;39. in this case the corporation instituted a suit claiming possession from the respondent contending that ..... trial court did not consider all these aspects of the matter but blindly followed the bar contained under section 132 and 133 of the karnataka land reforms act by observing that the land tribunal order is binding on the plaintiff. the said view taken by the trial court and affirmed by the lower appellate court is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2002KAR1342; 2002(3)KarLJ53
..... , learned counsel for the respondents submits that the scope of an enquiry as contemplated under section 77-a of the act is not the same as the one envisaged under section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act. the learned counsel submits that the scope of an enquiry under section 77-a is a limited one and confined ..... , learned counsel for the respondents submits that the scope of an enquiry as contemplated under section 77-a of the act is not the same as the one envisaged under section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act. the learned counsel submits that the scope of an enquiry under section 77-a is a limited one and confined ..... their applications made under section 77-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' for short).2. the appellants had filed the said applications under section 77-a of the act contending that they are the persons actually in possession and cultivation of the lands mentioned in their applications and that their forefathers had .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1987KAR2797; 1987(2)KarLJ327
..... came to be excluded from the purview of sections 1 to 87a of the bombay act 67/48. on 2-10-1965, bombay act 67/48 as amended by bombay act 13/56 came to be repealed by the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (act 10/62) (for short referred as the 'land reforms act'). thus, the lands in question came to be released from the management of the court of wards ..... w.p. nos. 6517 and 7971 of 1977. he claimed the status of a tenant entitled to registration as an occupant under section 45 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, which was not granted.2. the disputed lands are situated at yallur village in belgaum taluk. one nilkanthappa sangappa potdar of yallur died a few days prior to 27-2-1938 leaving behind, his .....
Tag this Judgment!