Court : Supreme Court of India
..... stifles their personal growth. 188 when caste prejudices manifest in institutional settings, such as prisons, they create further restrictions on the personal development and reformation of individuals from marginalized communities. when prison manuals restrict the reformation of prisoners from marginalized communities, they violate their right ..... offenders (control and reform) act, 1956; bombay habitual offenders act, 1959; gujarat habitual offenders act, 1959; kerala habitual offenders act, 1960; karnataka habitual offenders act, 1961; andhra pradesh habitual offenders act, 1962; himachal pradesh habitual offenders act, 1969; goa, daman and diu habitual offenders act ..... supdt., central jail,94 this court upheld the constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights of prisoners against the undue harshness of prison practices. justice krishna iyer observed: a prison system may make rational distinctions in making assignments to inmates of vocational, educational and work opportunities available, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... " includes additions, alterations, replacements or remodelling of any existing civil structure; (c) temporary transfer or permitting the use or enjoyment of any intellectual property right; (d) development, design, programming, customisation, adaptation, upgradation, enhancement, implementation of information technology software; (e) agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an ..... with some special features to attract the customers, the building could be treated as a plant. in the case of commissioner of income tax, karnataka v. karnataka power corporation20, this court held that an electricity power generating station building would have to be treated as a plant as it would satisfy ..... preclude the classification of property, credit, profession and events for taxation. he submitted that it is settled law, as held in the case of hari krishna bhargav v. union of india & anr28 that a taxing statute is not open to challenge on the ground that the tax is harsh or excessive .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... no.1659-1660 of 2024 3.1. joint venture agreement31.1 a joint venture agreement10 was executed between karnataka power corporation limited11 and m/s eastern mineral and trading agency12 for a period of 25 years for the development of captive coal mines and supply of coal to the thermal power plant operated by kpcl namely, ..... no dispute between kpcl and kecml regarding the obligations cast on them under the contracts for the development of captive coal blocks and for supply of coal for consumption at the thermal power station (bpcl) located in the state of karnataka until the cag submitted an audit report for the year ending march, 2013. the high ..... mine. the bar chart for the coal production should be modified suitably. (iv) the coal mining will be done in accordance with the provisions of mines & minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957 and mineral concession rules, 1960 and subject to the provisions of other relevant statutes. (v) allocation of coal block may be cancelled in case .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 13(2) and 13(1)(d) the act. the proceedings are still pending before the concerned court, as observed hereinabove.10. one analogous development takes place where the petitioner is also proceeded departmentally. the departmental enquiry was sought to be initiated. the approval of the central vigilance commission ..... ganganagar, bengaluru 560 032 represented by special public prosecutor, *inserted words vide court order dated 10.09.2024 2 for cbi cases, high court of karnataka, dr. ambedkar veedhi, bengaluru 560 001. ... respondent (by sri p.prasanna kumar, spl.pp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the ..... 17.04.2018]. 10 shri muni ram meena, superintendent of customs, kempegowda international airport, devanahalli, bangalore. [statement dated 17.04.2018]. 11 shri shree krishna singh, superintendent of customs, 26 kempegowda international airport, devanahalli, bangalore [statement dated 17.04.2018]. 12 shri nagendra bihari sinha, superintendent of customs, kempegowda .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of cheating and only in those cases breach of contract would amount to cheating where there was any deception played at the very inception. if the intention to cheat has developed later on, the same cannot amount to cheating. in the present case, it has nowhere been stated that at the very inception that there was intention on behalf of ..... the complaint, i deem it appropriate to notice it. it reads as follows: zumera construction private limited to: date:26. 06-2024 hebbagodi police station, electronicy city, bommasandra, bengaluru, karnataka 560 009. from: mr.salman khan, authorized signatory of m/s zumera construction (p) ltd. aged about 28 years, having office at no.22/1, kaveriappa lay-out, millers ..... 11. in vijay kumar ghai v. state of w.b. [vijay kumar ghai v. state of w.b., (2022) 7 scc124: (2022) 2 scc (cri) 787]. , one of us, (krishna murari j.) observed in reference to earlier decisions as under : (scc pp. 139-40, paras 24-25) 24. this court in g. sagar suri v. state of u.p. [g .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... against the legislative policy of the advocates act.90. dignity is crucial to substantive equality. the dignity of an individual encompasses the right of the individual to develop their potential to the fullest.96 the right to pursue a profession of one s choice and earn livelihood is integral to the dignity of an individual. ..... legal profession.92. the decision of the sbcs to charge exorbitant fees also suffers from the vice of manifest arbitrariness. in khoday distilleries ltd v. state of karnataka,99 this court laid down the following principles for challenging delegated legislation: (i) the test of arbitrary action which applies to executive actions does not necessarily ..... of the society. therefore, the current enrolment fee structure charged by the sbcs is unreasonable and infringes article 19(1)(g). 112 minerva talkies v. state of karnataka, 1988 supp scc176[15]. 64 part h h. financial implications for the sbcs and the bci103 as discussed in the above segments of this judgment, we .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... authorities thereof. ]. 220 sandur manganese & iron ores ltd v. state of karnataka, (2010) 13 scc1[39]. 221 sayyed ratanbhai sayeed v. shirdi nagar panchayat, (2016) 4 scc631222 meerut development authority v. association of management studies, (2009) 6 scc171[67]. 100 part ..... of state ........... 134 7 e. any limitation can extend to prohibition ........................................................ 135 f. impact of taxes on mineral rights on mineral development ............................. 142 i. scope of entry 49 ................................................................................................. 146 i. land system in india ........................................................................................ 146 ii. tax on land and buildings ..... 1, 51, 54, 66 42 a l s p p l subrahmanyan chettiar v. muthuswami goundan, (1940) 2 fcr188 a s krishna v. state of madras, 1957 scr399[8].; 43 k c gajapathi narayan deo v. state of orissa, (1953) 2 scc178[11]. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , (2006) 1 scc1 this court applied the precautionary principle while directing that all precautionary measures must be taken when forest lands are diverted for non-forest use. 48.1 karnataka industrial areas development board vs. c. kenchappa, (2006) 6 scc371( c. kenchappa ) is another case where this court applied the precautionary principle to emphasize on the requirement of carrying on an impact ..... dam or a mega project is definitely an attempt to achieve the goal of wholesome development. such works could very well be treated as integral component for development.30.3. the necessity to strike a balance between development and ecology was reiterated by this court in karnataka industrial areas development board v. c. kenchappa (2-judge bench)38 wherein it was observed: 61. the priority .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... such as a company could not be ascribed with criminal intent [ref champa agency v. r. chowdhury,16 sunil banerjee v. krishna nath,17 and ak khosla v. venkatesan18 ].. the bombay high court, differed, and had taken note of developments in the united kingdom. in esso standard inc. v. udharam bhagwandas japanwalla19 arguments were advanced before the court on whether a company ..... - 1 - nc:2024. khc:27618 crl.p no.697 of 2018 in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the16h day of july, 2024 r before the hon'ble mr justice suraj govindaraj criminal petition no.697 of2018(482) between united spirits limited a company .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... widest form. its objects include, inter alia to establish, maintain, carry on and assist schools, colleges, universities, research institutions, libraries, hospitals and take up development and general welfare activities for the benefit of the underprivileged/backward/tribal people of society without any discrimination. these activities are voluntary, charitable and non- profit making ..... .45. before parting with the matter, we deem it necessary to answer the aforesaid submission of the respondents. this court in union of india v. hindustan development corporation reported in (1993) 3 scc499enunciated that the doctrine of legitimate expectation is a creature of public law aimed at civil appeals @ slp (c) nos. ..... is involved and if there is no public law element is involved, no writ lies.55. in t.m.a. pai foundation v. state of karnataka, (2002) 8 scc481 an eleven-judge bench of this court formulated certain points in fact to reconsider its earlier decision in ahmedabad st. xavier's college .....
Tag this Judgment!