Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka irrigation act 1965 section 13 irrigation officer may cause obstruction to be removed Page 4 of about 39 results (0.153 seconds)

Godavari Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Agricultural Products Commissioner and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD783; 2004(5)ALT599; 2005(1)CTLJ535(AP)

..... the technical committee also evolved guidelines for reaching various parameters like manufacturing facilities for inline emitters and plain laterals (online irrigation system) and emitting pipe (inline drip system), bis licence for online and inline, national and international exposure, financial capability, project experience in terms ..... the district collector and he will organize, supervise and co-ordinate the completion of the project on or before the specified project period or such other period/date as may be fixed under the conditions, subject to the release of funds by goap and bankers; the supplier and the beneficiary farmer and their obligations in terms of tripartite agreement.80 ..... in kanmakar's case, a constitution bench of the supreme court considered the question whether the report of the enquiry officer in departmental enquiry against public servant is required to be furnished to the employee to enable him to make proper representation to the disciplinary authority before such authority arrives its ..... state of karnataka (supra) is an authority for the proposition that pre-conditions of eligibility cannot be deviated from and strict compliance test should be applied, whereas the conditions requiring formalities in relation to the pre-conditions can be deviated from without causing prejudice to the ..... address itself to the matter before it; it must not act under the dictates of another body or disable itself from ..... opportunity before a public servant removed/ dismissed or reduced to .....

In Re : Networking of Rivers

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... one of the possible views taken with regard to article 262 is that the use of expression `may' in the constitution does not indicate a clear legislative intent, thus, it may be possible that section 11 of the act could refer only to such disputes as are already referred to a - tribunal and which are outside ..... out of the independent links to be pursued for discussion, the first were the links in the states of gujarat, maharashtra, chattisgarh; secondly, the states of karnataka, madhya pradesh, uttar pradesh and rajasthan were to be included in discussions and thirdly, the states of andhra pradesh, tamil nadu and orissa were to be invited for discussion.the detailed project reports ..... the recommendations of the committee on pricing of irrigation (also known as the vaidynathan committee report) were further studied by the group of officers formed by the planning commission in 40 october, 1992.it recommended that the irrigation water rates should cover the full annual o & m cost in phases ..... convincingly dispel all other impressions.there shall be greater growth in agricultural and allied sectors, prosperity and stimulus to the economy potentially causing increase in per capita income, in addition to the short and long term benefits likely to accrue by such implementation. ..... the learned amicus curiae, who had been pursuing this public cause for a number of years, in furtherance to the request of this court, has also submitted a detailed note with regard to the background and summary of .....

M.D. Narayan Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ572

..... or order of any court, tribunal or any other authority, zonal regulations appended to the outline development plan of the bangalore city planning area made under the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (karnataka act 11 of 1963} as they existed during the period from 22nd may, 1972 to 12th october, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said zonal regulations') shall be deemed to have been modified as specified in the schedule with ..... for the purpose of giving effect to sub-section (1) the state government may abstract or cause to be abstracted, during every water year, such quantity of water as it may deem requisite, from the flows of the cauvery river and its tributaries, in such manner and during such intervals as the state government or any officer, not below the rank of an engineer-in-chief designated by it, may deem fit and proper'.vide section 4 it was declared that the provisions of ..... a constitution bench of this court in the case of cauvery water disputes tribunal, supra, had to pronounce on the validity of karnataka cauvery basin irrigation protection ordinance, 1991, by which an interim order passed by a statutory tribunal supported by the decision of this court dated 26th april, 1991, (reported in 1951 air scw 1286), ..... , firstly, whether the legislature possesses competence over the subject-matter, secondly, whether byvalidation the legislature has removed the defect which the courts had found in the previous law and, thirdly, whether it is consistent with the .....

Mandya Zilla Raithara Hitharakshana Samithi and ors. Vs. Government of ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(7)KarLJ411

..... stated that the work done by the respondent has been checked at each stage by the quality control staff of irrigation department under the supervision of officer of irrigation department and kscc engineers and no room is given for substandard work.7. ..... also stated that the first petitioner is not a society which is functioning according to the provisions of the karnataka societies registration act and the board of management seems to have not taken decision to file these petitions. ..... the reply, by modernisation about 5,250 acres of new achkat have been provided water for irrigation purposes and about 10,000 acres of existing achkatdars have been provided sufficient water. ..... stated that the execution of project work was entrusted to a high power technical committee and that the irrigation minister has no role in the execution of the project, except deciding on policy matters.5. ..... , the learned counsel for respondent 12-karnataka state construction corporation limited, has filed detailed statement of objections denying the allegations made as false and baseless and prays that the petitions may be dismissed. ..... this court in an appropriate case can issue directions if there is gross violation of fundamental rights or if the issue involved touches the conscience of the court but not for espousing the cause of others, for personal gain, publicity or political motive. ..... stated that the petitioners are not entitled for any relief claimed and the writ petitions may be dismissed with exemplary costs.8. .....

B. Ramalakshma Reddy and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD782

..... left flank canal for the benefit of fifteen villages of manvi taluka of raichur district (old hyderabad state and now in karnataka state); eight villages of gadwal taluka; 67 villages of alampur taluka in mahaboobnagar district and four villages of kurnool taluka of ..... by the petitioners and they may get adversely effected under the provisions of the andhra pradesh land reforms (ceiling on agricultural holdings) act, 1973.12, in the counter-affidavit, it is, inter alia stated that the cropping pattern as per the original scheme and the localisation aim is to provide water for khariff wet to an extent of 14,215 hectares amounting to 40% of the localised area; and extent of 19,332 hectares as rabi irrigated dry constituting 55%. ..... such suggestions, formulations may have impact and influence on the liberties, culture and the ethos of people of a sovereign democratic republic and may require a deeper study by the knowledgeable and informed sections of the society.but what is the role of the courts?evidently, the impugned decision of the government is in the nature of a policy and appears to have been taken ..... that the scheme has achieved its purpose, which is intended to be a protective unit to serve the drought proned sections and most backward areas in the state of andhra pradesh?7. ..... it is true that there is one very well informed section in the society having its reservation about the very mode and method of these type of developmental activities and utilisation of natural resources .....

State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ors. Vs. the Presiding Officer, Lab ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR289(Jhr)]; (2006)IILLJ346Jhar

..... spencer bowar and turner on the law relating to estoppel by representation, wherein the learned authors observed that when a person is confronted with two alternatives and mutually exclusive courses of action in relation to a dealing between which he may make his election and such person conducts himself as reasonably to induce the other to believe that he is intending definitely to adopt the one course and definitely to reject or relinquish the other and the second person ..... 4803 of 1997-r, contended that the objection now being sought to be taken on behalf of the appellant and the state of bihar regarding the status of the irrigation department as an industry' within the meaning of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, could have been taken by the appellant and the state of bihar when the dispute raised by the workmen had been referred under section 10 of the aforesaid act to the labour court for adjudication. ..... the reference itself was thereafter, taken up and the presiding officer passed his award on 20th december, 1995, holding that the 46 concerned workmen who had appeared in the reference were eligible to become permanent with effect from one year after their initial appointment as ..... was submitted that the employees in the irrigation department of the government were not 'workmen' within the meaning of the industrial disputes act, 1947 and that such view had been expressed by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of executive engineer (state of karnataka) v. k. .....

Gujarat Forest Producers, Gatherers and Forest Workers Union Vs. State ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)2GLR568; (2004)IIILLJ259Guj

..... / or distribution of goods and services were not under consideration and the holding that the irrigation department is an industry has an obvious reference to the undertaking of the irrigation and canals works by the department that fell under consideration and not all the sections or the units of the department which may be 'non-industry'.27.6 the division bench of this court in s.c.thakor (supra) was ..... the constitutional functions of the state of undertaking social welfare activities under the directive principles of state policy would not amount to industrial activities.14.1 the word 'industry' as defined in section 2(j) of the act reads as under :'section 2(j) :- 'industry' means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation of ..... third ingredient of the triple ingredients test that such unit, establishment or undertaking of the department can be said to be 'industry' unless falling in categories removed by constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions from the scope of industrial disputes act as indicated in clause (c) of item iv of the guidelines laid down by the supreme court in paragraph 161 of the bangalore water supply case ( ..... officer, labour court, gorakhpur, reported in 2001(4) lln 1190, holding that uttar pradesh jal nigam was an industry within the meaning of section 2(j), and the decision of the ..... .....

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. P. K. Sinha

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... serving (i) who is a senior and eminent engineer with wide experience in water resource management; handling of inter- state water sharing issues; construction, operation and maintenance of irrigation projects; or (ii) an all india service officer, in the rank of secretary or additional secretary to the government of india with experience in wate resources and inter-state water sharing issues. ..... may from time to time appoint or employ such and so many officers and employees as it thinks fit and remove or dismiss them, under the rules and regulations applicable to the appointment, removal and dismissal of the central government officers ..... tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal ) to adjudicate upon the water dispute regarding the inter-state river cauvery and the river valley thereof among the states of karnataka, kerala, tamil nadu and union territory puducherry (then pondicherry; and whereas the tribunal investigated the matters referred to it and forwarded to the central government a report under sub-section (2) of section 5 of the said act, on 05.02.2007. ..... will be bound by the contours regarding apportionment of river water in terms of the award as modified by this court and while doing so, is expected to take into account all factors that may be relevant at the given point of time, including to identify the situation of distress in the basin caused due to identifiable factors before quantifying the water quantity for being released or allotted to the party states/u.t. .....

Mohit Vs. State of Maharashtra, thru its Secretary, Ministry of Irriga ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... submitted that recruitment rules are not framed by the water conservation department and hence, the services of the petitioners are liable to be regularized, as the recruitment rules of the irrigation department on which the state government has relied while issuing the impugned advertisement, dated 15/02/2016, would not apply while making the appointment of the employees in the water conservation department ..... it is stated that the state government, as an unscrupulous employer has sought to take advantage of the provisions of section 2(oo)(bb) of the act by appointing the petitioners on contract basis only for a period of 11 months, though the posts on which the petitioners were appointed are ..... it is submitted that the diploma-engineers could be promoted to the cadre of deputy engineer, as sub-divisional officers to the extent of 33%, whereas the degree-engineers could be promoted as assistant engineers class-ii or sub-divisional engineers to the ..... qualification is prescribed and the candidate secures a higher qualification after securing the prescribed minimum qualification, then he may have a case, like a candidate securing a masters degree in arts after securing the bachelor degree in arts ..... telecom district manager, karnataka), air 2006 sc 2427 (haryana state electronics ..... submissions, as canvassed on behalf of the petitioners have been elaborately dealt with by the constitution bench of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of the secretary, state of karnataka and others vs. .....

Mr. Gopal S/o Govind Karjol Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... that ever since 1985, lands were being acquired for implementing ukp which was for the avowed public purpose of irrigating large tracts of land in various districts of north karnataka extending upto yadagiri.3. ..... seized for feeding a starving section of the community, it is a public purpose that is met but, if the same bread is desired for the private dinner of a political maharajah who may pro tem fill a public office, it is a private purpose ..... the 16 (2007) 1 scc64117 (1977) 4 scc47118 (1973) 4 scc225- 29 - wa no.100139 of 2022 c/w wa no.100062/2022 matter has to be examined with reference to the various provisions of the act, its context and set up, the purpose of acquisition has to be culled out therefrom and then it has to be judged whether the acquisition is for a public purpose within the meaning of article 31(2) and the ..... direction given by the learned single judge of this court in collateral proceedings initiated by the appellants, state treated the notification initially issued under section 17 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short, act ) as one under section 4(1) of the act and permitted the parties to submit their objections which is in the nature of objections filed under section 5-a of the act. ..... in other words the question would then arise whether that declaration was merely a colourable exercise of the power conferred by the act, 15 air1963sc151- 28 - wa no.100139 of 2022 c/w wa no.100062/2022 and, therefore, the declaration is open to challenge at the instance .....