Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka irrigation act 1965 section 13 irrigation officer may cause obstruction to be removed Court: chennai Page 1 of about 1 results (0.034 seconds)

Madurai Coats Private Limited Coats India, Rep. by Its General Manager ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ449

..... action contemplated in respect of these units.iii) the tnpcb is directed to augment its engineer and staff strength at the erode office by assigning five additional assistant engineers to the erode office within four weeks and providing additional facilities such as vehicles, testing equipments such as hand held tds meters, a dedicated telephone number ..... the definition of 'air pollutant' under section 2(a) of the air act, which means any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in the atmosphere in such concentration as may be or tend to be injurious to human beings or other living creatures or plants or property or environment and the definition of 'air pollution' under section 2(b) of the air act means the presence in the atmosphere of ..... also bleaching units where discharge of untreated/unsatisfactorily treated effluent is noticed.v) the tnpcb should cause review of chlorine use and storage procedures in the industrial sector and ensure that the best available technology is adopted for colour removal, and health of the communities is not put at risk due to adoption of low ..... sk channel under such situation will only be carrying the effluents from mcpl and prolonged discharge of such effluents for irrigation will have adverse impacts in the long term.therefore, it is not merely the tds discharge within the norms of ..... render the acts of a statutory authority void in law.again the same has been followed by the apex court in the recent judgement in karnataka state financial corporation .....

The Land Commissioner Chepauk, Chennai and Others Vs. VGP Housing Pvt. ...

Court : Chennai

..... 95.74 acres, which have been declared as surplus lands from out of the extent of 118.26 acres cannot stand the test of legal scrutiny and, in view of the above mentioned lacunae in the notification issued under section 18 (1) of the land reforms act, the 1st respondent herein/petitioner is entitled for exemption from acquisition, which has been rightly granted by the learned single judge. 18. ..... tribunal pointed out that the lands have been classified as punja lands, which means that the lands could be brought under the plough and went on to hold that even though there may be no actual source of irrigation, the same would not render the lands as non-agricultural ..... . learned judge, in the said decision, also highlighted that though an attempt was made to show that inspection was conducted by the officers, who opined that the lands are not cultivable, however, no pertinent material has been placed before the court to establish ..... deed. this position of law has been settled by the division bench of the karnataka high court in bangarappa's case (supra), on which reliance was placed by the ..... thus, the order of the single judge setting aside the show cause notice for resumption of the lands allotted to the appellant having reached finality, the revenue department ought to have confirmed the allotment in ..... however, the revenue department issued a show cause notice for resumption of the above allotment on the ground that the same is required for public purpose, though the nature of purpose was .....

National Highways Authority Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... as well as the undergoing project, for which, already, it has been assured by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that nhai would not indulge in any activity that would obstruct water-flow or adversely affect the water bodies, there is no difficulty for this court to permit nhai to proceed with the remaining portion of the work, of course, with ..... no.1857/13 - to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 6th respondent/assistant engineer, pwd, water resources organisation, irrigation section, keeranur, pudukottai district, vide his letter no.51/2012/ae(k), dated 09.11.2012, quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent/secretary to government ..... co-ordinated with the pwd by getting their suggestions, specifications, diagrams for the purpose of laying structure suiting to the designs furnished by pwd to ensure that no obstruction is caused to the free flow and movement of the water into the tanks when roads are laid ..... it appears that there could hardly be a dispute that the project is a mega project which is in the larger public interest of the state of karnataka and merely because there was a change in the government, there was no necessity for reviewing all decisions taken by the previous government, which is ..... make a distinction between the government's general obligation to act for the public benefit, and the special, more demanding obligation which it may have as a trustee of certain public resources. ..... of karnataka .....

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. M/S. Rao Constructions, Bangalore and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad14

..... but learned counsel for the appellant herein drew our attention to the following passage in the said judgment:--'although the arbitrators have termed that damages have to be paid on account of the delay caused on the part of the appellants what really has happened is that the rates prevalent and accepted by the department have been adopted as per the rate analysis filed by them. ..... thirunavukkarasu, superintending engi-neer, public works department, now chief engineer posted as director of irrigation management training institute on deputation) appointed under section 14 of the arbitration act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). ..... if that was all the intendment of the parties, then instead of fixing the deviation limit at 30% a clause whatever be the excess quantity of work that the contractor may be expected to turn out, he would be entitled to only at the tendered rate, would have been incorporated in this clause and nothing more could have been incorporated. ..... further, learned counsel for the appellajit also points out that the said detailed calculations in the said case should have been inter alia, made in the context of the local conditions prevailing in the karnataka state and it cannot also be said that the same conditions are prevailing in the present case in tamil nadu. .....

M. Swaminathan Vs. the Secretary to Government, Industries Department ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)1MLJ1276

..... stating that the subject matter of the land was not allotted to anyone by the bhoodan board as per section 19 of the tamil nadu bhoodan yagna act, 1958, and the bhoodan board is the absolute owner of the property and on verification of the records, donations made have been notified and published in the state gazettee dated 19.5.1965 and in the district gazettee dated 10.4.1968 and no allotment has been notified. ..... in form 'a' were sent by registered post and form 'b' notices were affixed in the offices of the district collector, kancheepuram; revenue divisional office, kancheepuram; taluk office, sriperumpudur; police station, manimangalam; sub-registrar's office, wallajabad; and village office, oragadam, giving thirty (30) days time for submitting objections and the date of enquiry was ..... 'a', gave its consent for acquiring the land and even assuming that the petitioners were in possession of the land, form 'b' notice was also already displayed in the public offices, apart from making beat by tom-tom on 2.2.2007 and that the petitioners have not objected the acquisition during the enquiry held on 20.3.2007. ..... that there is no facility to irrigate the lands and the petitioners never irrigated the lands as they were not ..... on the part of the revenue authorities by itself would not cast any obligation on the authorities under the act to make a roving enquiry and try to locate an owner who may have subsequently purchased the land from the previous owner. ..... state of karnataka) and in paragraph .....

C. Srinivasa Rao and Etc. Vs. P. Ramankutty and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1999Mad317

..... : air1996sc2853 , held that even if prohibition of interest is shown in the term of the contract, such prohibition will be applicable to the commissioner or the officers of the department as the case may be and not to an arbitrator, who shall have the power to award interest pendente lite. ..... learned arbitrator has filed six different original petitions under section 14(2) of the arbitration act, 1940, for receiving the awards and to pass a decree in terms ..... on the side of the tamil nadu housing board may fall under section 30-(a) that the arbitrator has misconducted the proceedings or under section 30-(c) 'otherwise invalid' as the other grounds shown in the said section are not applicable to the instant case. ..... there was a clear finding of the arbitrator that the contract was not rendered ineffective in terms of section 56 of the contract act due to abnormal rise in prices of material and labour. ..... advanced on the side of the tamil nadu housing board the learned counsel for the contractor has contended that this court cannot act like an appellate court and the award has to be viewed as held by the supreme court in various judgments. ..... the supreme court of india in secretary, irrigation department, government of orissa, v. g.c. ..... this decision of the karnataka high court would prove that signing the final bill or receiving the amount shown in the final bill is independent of the claim for compensation made by the contractor at a later stage and ..... bench of the karnataka high court in konda .....

R. Ramanathan and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Its ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)2MLJ406

..... masilamani, contended that the impugned action is arbitrary, without jurisdiction not supported by law, that he respondents are estopped by conduct,' that the earlier proceedings by the revenue divisional officer by which patta was restored and conditions have been deleted is binding on the government, that at this belated stage, and after a lapse of 60 years from the date of ..... apex court held that economic empowerment to adi dravidars and the power as a part of distributive justice is a fundamental right and the alienation is void under section 23 of the contract act being violative of the constitutional scheme of economic empowerment to accord equality of status, dignity of persons and economic empowerment.21. ..... according to the learned senior counsel for the petitioners the respondents are estopped and the earlier orders passed by the revenue divisional officer on 8.9.1956 had reached finality and which factum is not disputed by the respondents and it cannot be reopened after 32 years on the same premises and such action is violative ..... reentry referred to above will vest in the revenue divisional officer, in regard to valuable lands subject to a maximum limit of 2 1/2 acres of wet or irrigable dry land, or of 5 acres if the land is valuable and not wet or irrigable dry. ..... the present impugned order has been passed on 4.3.1987 and without even issuing a show cause notice and thus the impugned order passed by the respondents is violative of principles of ..... karnataka ..... of karnataka : .....

Pushpak Akarwal, Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Inspector of Police, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1853

..... the de facto complainant, who has transformed the said cheques to the third party concerned and sent the same for encashment; that the de facto complainant issued notice under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, threatening the petitioners for imprisonment and though the de facto complainant knew that those cheques were without consideration and in spite of having received the amount in hand, the ..... ' for all the above discussions held, this court is of the view that it is neither feasible nor necessary on the part of this court to cause its interference into the case registered by the respondent in crime no.12 of 2003 and has taken up for investigation and on a overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the position ..... in (2003) iv slt 335 the honourable apex court, considering the point that `whether the high court can exercise its inherent powers under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure in a matter where the investigation is pending', following the earlier decisions reported in (emperor vs. ..... , which are as follows:-(i) in pasumai irrigation ltd. ..... with the investigation or during the course of investigation which would mean from the time of the lodging of the first information report till the submission of the report by the officer-in-charge of police station in court under section 173(2) cr.p.c. ..... government advocate, representing the respondent, would also cite a decision of the hon'ble apex court reported in state of karnataka v. m. .....

Premier Mills Ltd., Hosur Taluk Dharmapuri Department, Rep. by Deputy ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)ILLJ993Mad

..... -(1) where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, the conciliation officer may, or where the dispute relates to a public utility service and a notice under section 22 has been given, shall hold conciliation proceedings in the prescribed manner. ..... also invoked the power vested in then under section 10b of the industrial disputes act and ordered the textile mills in the state to pay interim relief to the workmen employed by them. ..... to the industry and also loss of revenue to the government and was also causing damage to the economy of the country, the government thought that the recurrence of such strike in the textile industry is not conducive to the well being of the economy of the country and thought it fit to invoke the provisions of section 10 of the industrial disputes act and referred some of the demands raised by the workmen for adjudication by the industrial tribunal chennai and ..... the learned additional advocate general relying upon the decision of the karnataka high court reported in (kanoria industries v. ..... vaigai by placing reliance upon the decision reported in (the madhya pradersh irrigation karamchari sangh v. .....

National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. Rep. by Its Regional Genera ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ284Mad; (2005)3MLJ126

..... , or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; or(iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or(iv) who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred ..... the word 'apprentice' has not been defined in the industrial disputes act, 1947, but it has been defined in section 2(aa) of the apprentices act, 1961 as follows:''apprentice' means a person who is undergoing apprenticeship training in pursuance of a contract of apprenticeship. ..... it is alleged in the petition filed by the respondent that on 1.5.1992 without any reason or enquiry, the management had removed him from service orally although he served continuously for more than 240 days. ..... vide chief engineer (irrigation) chepauk v. n. ..... karnataka state road transport corp. ..... it may be mentioned that the industrial disputes act makes no difference between a regular employee and a casual employee. ..... its workmen, 1966 (ii) llj 194, may & baker ltd. v. ..... it may be mentioned that an apprentice is a person who is undergoing training. .....