Skip to content


Karnataka Highways Act 1964 Section 24 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka highways act 1964 section 24 Page 1 of about 715 results (5.296 seconds)
Apr 19 2017 (HC)

Anil S/O Vishwanath Manjanabail Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... present case firstly this acquisition is not under old central land acquisition act 1894 but under karnataka highways act 1964 therefore section 24 2 of the act ex facie does not apply secondly the possession of the land .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 2020 (SC)

Bengaluru Development Authority Vs. Mr. Sudhakar Hegde

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... appellant that the prr project being neither a project falling within section 2 of the national highways act 1956 or section 3 of the karnataka highways act 1964 does not fall within the ambit of the schedule to ..... the 2006 notification has been amended15 since the coming into force of the 2006 notification 24 prior to the issuance of the 2006 notification a draft notification was published in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 2023 (HC)

Hubballi Uraban Development Authority Vs. Hubballi Dharwad Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... construction can take place in the no construction zone keeping in view of sections 7 and 9 of the karnataka highways act 1964 read with the circular dated 22nd december 2005 issued by the state government ..... the acquired lands form part of road margin writ petitioners were not entitled to compensation 24 in this context it is relevant to state that the said change of revenue records .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 2014 (HC)

Smst Transport, Represented by Its Proprietor Ameersab and Others Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

s 19 a of the act as amended by the karnataka act no 31 of 2010 and contended that there is the petitioners for transportation of iron ore are the state highways as classified by virtue of the power under s 3 all vehicles plying on bridges causeways and tunnels and the act does not empower the state to collect toll fee for illegal secondly s 48 a of the karnataka highways act 1964 for short the act empowers the state to collect toll trace the power to s 19 a by amending the section as per karnataka act 31 of 2010 the statement of by karnataka act no 31 of 2010 with effect from 24th july 2010 the relevant provisions of the act read as

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 1990 (HC)

G.K. Sheygoor and Another Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalore and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1991Kant161; 1990(2)KarLJ460

..... the tank bund area as the said area is annexed to mysore bangalore kolar highway seeondly under the karnataka highways act 1964 the authorities will be collecting tax at different places if the respondents are ..... registration act 1960 17 of 1960 section 9 n kumar j power of review in the instant case the registrar passed an order dated 24 11 2006 directing the second respondent to change .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2018 (HC)

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... on 19 04 2017 has held that the provisions of section 24 2 of 2013 act would not be applicable to karnataka highways act 1964 which is a state enactment which squarely applies to this ..... case acquisition initiated under the provisions of the karnataka high ways act has categorically held that the provision of 2013 act more particularly section 24 thereof would not apply to any acquisition initiated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 2003 (HC)

Smt. Sumathi and anr. Vs. Vittala Kanchan

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR131

the appellants herein is hit by section 61 of the karnataka land reforms act 7 with regard to the proposition of ejectment tenanted house granted under the provisions of land reforms act as amended by act 1 of 1974 bequeathed by will 69 of 1980 section 2 karnataka forest act 5 of 1964 section 24 p d dinakaran c j v g sabhahit to the conclusion that there is contravention of provisions of section 61 of the act and as such the plaintiff was 1980 section 2 karnataka forest act 5 of 1964 section 24 p d dinakaran c j v g sabhahit j suspension

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 28 2001 (HC)

M. Bhaktha Vachalam and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1040; 2002(2)KarLJ593

is expedient further to amend the karnataka municipalities act 1964 karnataka act no 22 of 1964 and the karnataka municipal corporation follows where any mysore act made after commencement of this act authorises or requires any document to be served by post it is expedient further to amend the karnataka municipalities act 1964 karnataka act no 22 of 1964 and the karnataka municipal of mine further receives support from the provisions contained in section 27 of the karnataka general clauses act 1899 which reads section 11 of the municipalities act by karnataka act no 24 of 1998 the insistence of the mlcs being the registered

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2017 (HC)

Maruthi Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

r in the high court of karnataka dharwad bench dated this the13h day of june2017present the hon representation or request for renewal is something else and the actual renewal of these leases is something else without the approval with the section 72 2 of the karnataka municipalities act 1964 having not done so the petitioners cannot be compelled to an approval of the state government in accordance with the section 72 2 of the karnataka municipalities act 1964 having not office of the deputy commissioner bagalkot vide his letter dated 24 06 2015 had asked the municipal council to comply with

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 2015 (HC)

Smt K G Geetha Rudresh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the body functioning as a city municipal council under the karnataka municipalities act 1964 immediately before the date of the said city municipal area as a larger urban area under this act 1 subject to the provisions of section 3 the governor section 315 or section 316 of the karnataka municipalities act 1964 either an administrator or an officer has been appointed to new corporation is established for the first time then under section 3 of the act the governor has to specify by to any local area declared as a larger urban area 24 under sub section 1 with effect from the date specified

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //