Court : Karnataka
..... irregularities conducted and corrupt practices adopted by shri siddaramaiah, hon ble chief minister of karnataka concerning allotment of alternative sites by mysore urban development authority ( muda ) under various sections of pc, act, 1988 and bnss, 2023 has been perused.28. in view of the allegations and on prima facie perusal of the petitions ..... issued and the de-notification order was issued, sri siddaramaiah was the member of legislative assembly from chamundeshwari constituency as well as member of mysuru urban development authority, and further, this land was purchased by the brother-in-law of sri siddaramaiah, wherein, the seller was from the constituency of chamundeshwari, and ..... , are all acts done in accordance with law. it is not that the petitioner has been benefited out of any transaction nor the wife of the petitioner was the sole applicant for grant of compensatory sites. there are 120 people whose lands were taken over by the mysore urban development authority ( muda for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... unknown persons on 19-11-2021. this is based on a complaint with regard to the touts and middlemen belonging to sites and other properties of the bangalore development authority; it was more so with regard to distribution of sites to the general public and fraud taking place 6 therein. several allegations were made with regard to ..... or forged documents being created for the purpose of defrauding the common man and being completely hand in glove with the officers of the bangalore development authority. the crime comes to be registered for offences punishable under sections 7(a), 7(a), 8, 12, 13(1)(a) r/w 13(2) of the ..... publicly charged with acts of dishonesty, some suitable preliminary inquiry into the allegations by a responsible officer should be made. it could be in the nature of source information report or otherwise.8. the criminal prosecution against the petitioner - accused herein was launched on the basis of diary seized from the office of the bangalore development authority, in which, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the first appellate court could not have gone beyond the order of the trial court and thereafter held that without issuing notice under section 64 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 (hereinafter referred as kuda, 1987) the suit could not have been proceeded with and it was duty on part of the trial court to have rejected ..... is as follows. whether it would be a mandatory requirement for issuance of a notice under section 64 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 before a suit for bare injunction can be filed against urban development authority seeking for injunction more particularly as against demolition or the like?.6. section 64 of kuda, 1987 reads as under:64. ..... 29. hence, i answer the substantial question by holding that though it is mandatory for issuance of a notice under section 64 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 before a suit or other proceedings is commenced against the - 17 - nc:2024. khc:19717 rsa no.1060 of 2015 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... layout .2. the relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government with all the relevant particulars seeking ..... .point no.(4):- it was next contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of the government he cannot be appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... layout .2. the relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government with all the relevant particulars seeking ..... .point no.(4):- it was next contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of the government he cannot be appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... layout .2. the relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government with all the relevant particulars seeking ..... .point no.(4):- it was next contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of the government he cannot be appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... layout .2. the relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government with all the relevant particulars seeking ..... .point no.(4):- it was next contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of the government he cannot be appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... layout .2. the relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government with all the relevant particulars seeking ..... .point no.(4):- it was next contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of the government he cannot be appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... layout .2. the relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government with all the relevant particulars seeking ..... .point no.(4):- it was next contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of the government he cannot be appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... layout .2. the relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government with all the relevant particulars seeking ..... .point no.(4):- it was next contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of the government he cannot be appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!