Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 17 obtaining information Page 1 of about 96,617 results (0.429 seconds)

The Diocese of Mysore of the Roman Catholic Church, Mysore Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR627; 1998(6)KarLJ89

..... i went on answering them. when oneof the reporters asked me the question what is the purview of thekannada development authority, i said that as far as the operation of the kannada development authority act is concerned, in alighter vein i did say that everything under the sky and above theground in karnataka fall ..... within the karnataka developmentauthority's ambit. but, it was not my intention to say that thekannada development authority can have its jurisdiction overeach and every ..... that the deponent in his enthusiasm to discharge his function as the chairman of the kannada development authority should not make provocative statement. the 2nd respondent has been constituted under the kannada development act. the function of the authority for which the 2nd respondent has been constituted is as envisaged in section 15 of .....

B.S. Muddappa and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1990Kant87; ILR1989KAR3027; 1989(2)KarLJ540

..... is also not in dispute that by a notification dated 3-1-1973 issued by the state government in purported exercise of its powers under sec. 23 of the improvement act, (since repealed and replaced by bangalore development authority act, 1976 which came into force with retrospective effect from 20-12-1975 hereinafter referred to as the b.d. a ..... ' as defined in s. 2(b) of the b.d. act, from the subsequent amendments made to it by the amendment act, 1984. s. 2 of the amendment act provides as follows:'2. amendment of s. 2, -- in s. 2 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (karnataka act 12 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as the principal act), after cl. (b) the following clause shall be inserted .....

Hubballi Uraban Development Authority Vs. Hubballi Dharwad Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... entitled to compensation. it was further contended that insofar as the cases wherein plans were sanctioned prior to the karnataka urban development authority act, 1987 (for short, the kuda act ) came into force, the layouts were sanctioned/approved in accordance with the prevailing master plan which provided for road margin ..... and the assistant commissioner, krdcl, hdbrtsc office, 1st floor, ksfc building, rayapur, p.b. road, dharwad-580009.6. dharwad, haveri, gadag and uttar kannada district co-operative milk producers societies ltd., lakmanahalli industrial area, p.b.road, vidyagiri, dharwad -580004, represented by its managing director. respondents (by sri. gangadhar ..... ksfc building, rayapur, p.b.road, dharwad-580009. appellant (by sri. c. v. angadi, advocate) and:1. dharwad, haveri, gadag and uttar kannada district, co operatives milk producers societies ltd., lakamanahalli industrial area, p.b. road, vidyagiri dharwad -580004, represented by its managing director.2. the state of .....

A.V. Laxman Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2331; 1995(6)KarLJ620

..... it reads as under:'81b consequences to ensue upon the constitution of the bangalore development authority.- notwithstanding anything contained in this act, with effect from the date on which the bangalore development authority is constituted under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 the following consequences shall ensue: (i) the bangalore development authority shall be the local planning authority for the local planning area comprising the city of bangalore with jurisdiction over ..... /cess or ring road surcharge, in the absence of any statutory power to do so under the planning act or under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (for short 'the bda act'). he further contended that even under provisions of the bangalore water supply and sewerage board act, there is no provision to levy any impost in respect of any capital work. the board is empowered .....

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and for quashing the notification s.o. 3348 (e) dated 17.10.2017, promulgated by respondent no.1 being ultra vires the power under the delhi development authority act of 1957, and in violation of article 14 and 21 of constitution of india;120. in addition to grounds urged in t.c. (c) 229/2020 ..... scheme in question was not an approved 40 (1990) 2 scc334transfer case (c) no.229 of 2020 page 72 of 179 scheme under the trust act, the development authority could not have dispensed with the procedure prescribed under section 50 of the adhiniyam.34. more direct and relevant is the decision in syed hasan rasul numa ..... lease. the principles of administrative justice squarely apply to such functioning and are subject to judicial review. the development authority, therefore, cannot transgress its powers as stipulated in law and act in a discriminatory manner. the development authority should always be reluctant to mould the statutory provisions for individual, or even for public convenience as this .....

U.P. Badminton Association Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2434

..... by the high court. the second area of controversy arose out of the order of the vice chairman, lucknow development authority, cancelling the earlier order dated january 31, 1985, granting permission under section 15 of the act in favour of the respondent lessees to develop the lease hold property by erecting thereon a multi-storeyed building called 'balrampur towers'.73. the controversy arose, as ..... the government brought to the notice of the then vice chairman, lucknow development authority what, according to the government, were serious illegalities in the sanction .....

R.K. Mittal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2012(2)SCC232; 2012(1)MLJ1143; 2012(1)SCJ747; AIR2012SCW390; AIR2012SC389

..... s. mudappa & ors. [(1991) 4 scc 54], wherein this court was concerned with the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 with particular reference to sections 33, 38 and 38(a) of that act. a site intended for a public park was sought to be converted into a hospital/nursing home, under the garb ..... such, they have also placed on record a list of hospitals being operated from residential blocks which have even been empanelled by the appellant development authority. the development authority is acting arbitrarily and not taking any action against those persons, though they have executed the lease deed with the same terms and conditions as the ..... alter the same without following due process of law. even where such an exercise is required to be undertaken by the development authority, there also it is expected of the development authority to act for the betterment of the public and strictly in accordance with the plans and the statutory provisions. it cannot take recourse .....

The Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Ministry ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(4)CTC460; (2006)4MysLJ826

..... maintainability of such writ petition at the instance of the member-secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority.12. in this context, it is noticed that under section 9(b) of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971, the metropolitan development authority, a body corporate, shall have perpetual succession and a common seal and subject to ..... relating to coastal regulatory zone. such amendment was challenged in w.p. no. 15518/2003, which was filed by the member-secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority. such writ petition was entertained by a learned single judge and an order of interim stay of such notification till 25.06.2003 was passed by ..... such restriction or qualification as may be imposed by or under this act or any other law, may sue or be sued in its .....

Present : Mr.Ashwani Kumar Chopra Senior Advocate with Vs. M/S Arora B ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the chief administrator, punjab urban development authority (hereinafter referred to as 'puda') to issue completion certificate for which the petitioner is said to have applied on 28.3.2004 under section 14 (1) (ii) of the punjab apartment and property regulation act, 1995. a further direction is sought to the competent authority to determine the petitioner's ..... liability regarding external development charges, if any. we have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the records. some of ..... of 2012 [2].communications sent as late as on 17.2.2012 (annexure p-13) and 21.3.2012 (annexure p-14) that the jalandhar development authority has been insisting the petitioner to extend/renew the bank guarantee amounting to rs.34,00,000/-. the record reveals that the bank guarantee has not been .....

Bangalore International Airport Limited Vs. Karnataka Information Comm ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2010KAR3214

..... regard, one can refer to the division bench ruling of this court in the case of bhavan1 housing cooperative society limited (r) v. bangalore development authority reported in manu/ka/8325/2006. this court while considering whether the definition of a particular phrase can be imported in a particular enactment has held ..... in the state of karnataka which is called as greenfield project and to this effect, the government of karnataka has authorized ksiidc to be a nodal agency for undertaking all activities tdlvards development of the airport as a joint venture. he would also press into service certain clauses in the concession agreement which ..... that it is not a government company as defined under section 617 of the companies act. 1956. a shareholders agreement (sha) dated 23.01.2002 was entered into between the karnataka state industrial investment and development corporation limited (ksiidc), airport authority of india (aai). siemens project ventures gmbh, flughafen zuerich ag, larsen and .....