Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 17 obtaining information Court: orissa Page 9 of about 586 results (0.131 seconds)

Jul 23 1997 (HC)

Orissa Power Generation Corporation Ltd. Vs. Z. Engineer's Constructio ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1997(II)OLR175

..... award of the tribunal at this stage. in support of such argument mr. mohanty has relied on the decisions reported in (1987) 4 scc 217, prasan roy v. calcutta metropolitan development authority, and (1996) 3 scc 568, union of india v. g. s. atwal and co.6. out of the five points advanced by mr. mohapatra, points 2, 3, 4 and ..... regard after considering materials before it. in this connection in accept the argument of mr. mohanty that while dealing with the matter under sections 30 and 33 of the act the court is not supposed to sit in appeal and reassess the evidence and find out their sufficiency or otherwise to sustain the finding arrived at by the tribunal. law ..... as claimed by the company when the company wanted to make the award the rule of the court, the corporation filed an objection under sections 30 and 33 of the act which the court dealt with by the impugned order dismissing the objection on merit. the case of the corporation is that, though it received the quantity of materials as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2001 (HC)

Land Acquisition Collector, Cuttack Vs. Jayashree Das,

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 92(2001)CLT512

..... away from the lands which were acquired by the state government.the brochure (ext. 5) was published in 1985 and it was much after the acquisition. cuttack development authority in order to attract number of purchasers must have narrated extensively, but that was not available prior to acquiring the land by the state government. the cuttack city ..... 2,25,000/- per acre only on the basis of a sale deed which was registered just before the notification published under section 4 of the land acquisition act. it has been further alleged that the said sale deed was designedly and mischievously created showing inflated figures in order to claim higher compensation although the lands could ..... the said amount preferred objection before the land acquisition collector as a resuft of which he sent those cases to the civil court under section 18 of the land acquisition act.the learned civil judge (senior division) was, however, inclined to fix the market value of the land at the rate of rs. 2,25,000/- per .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1995 (HC)

NaraIn Extractions Private Limited Vs. P.C. Mishra, Food Inspector

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1996CriLJ736; 1995(II)OLR535

..... under the act, not being an offence under section 14 or 14a shall be instituted except by or with the written consent of the central government or the state government or a person authorised in that behalf by the central government or the state government. it means that necessary consent of the prescribed authority or person ..... responsible to the company for conduct of its business should have been arrayed as accused before invoking the deeming clause.section 17 takes care of offences committed under the act by a company on the principle of 'deemed guilt'. 'company' means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals (vide its explanation). ..... the accused in some cases and may also result in genuine offenders escaping punishment. we are unable to see why simple cases under the prevention of food adulteration act should be launched so late. tardiness in these matters is inexcusable'.in sewa ram (supra), a single judge of the punjab and haryana high court relying .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1994 (HC)

Sri Narayan Prasad Vs. the State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1995(II)OLR361

..... can be delegated to the executive. the basis of the statutory power conferred by the statute cannot be transgressed by the rule-making authority. a rule-making authority has no plenary power. it has to act within the limits of the power granted to it.'12. the matter again came up for consideration before the apex court in gapulal ..... , which in sum and substance is additional excise duty, though it was not actually due, as ultra vires the act and beyond the rule-making power of the state.16. the above mentioned cases are therefore authorities for the proposition that excise duty can only be levied in accordance with the charging provision and that it cannot be ..... under section 13 or manufactured in any distillery established or any distillery or brewery licensed under the act. the legislature has levied excise duty only on those articles which come within the scope of section 25. the rule-making authority has not been conferred with any power to levy duty on any articles which do not fall .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1948 (PC)

Saradhakar Naik and ors. Vs. the King

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1950Ori67

..... march 1948) delegated its extra-provincial jurisdiction in respect of orissa states to the provincial government of orissa including the power under section 4. the orissa government, acting under the said delegated authority passed on 1st january 1948 the administration of the orissa states order, 1948, whereby elaborate arrangements are enacted for the administration of the states. section 4 of ..... against the principle enumerated by the privy council in macleod's casa: (1891 a.c. 455: 60 l. j. p c. 55).67. the next case relied upon is (duff development co. ltd. v. government of kelantan, 1924 a. 0. 797 : (93 l, j. ch 343). this case was cited to prove that the constitutional position of a sovereign ..... it.'(c) judicial decisions : hemchand devchand v. azim sakarlal, (1906) a. c. 212 at pp. 233, 236; statham v. statham, 1912 p 92 : (81 l. j. p. 3 ) ; duff development co., ltd. v. govt. of kelanton, 1924 a. c. 797 : (93 l. j. ch. 343); the empress v. keshub, s cal. 987 : (11 c l. r. 241 f. b.) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2010 (HC)

Arup Kumar Das and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... all the members of the authorisation committee of all the states, in order to keep them apprised of all scientific development which are likely to have a bearing in the exercise of their authority under the toho act, 1994.(iii) the state government is directed to set up facilities for removal, storage and transplantation, at all the ..... appears from impugned order (under annexure-3) dated 16.6.2010 passed by the commissioner-cum-secretary to government, in the capacity of the appellate authority under the toho act, 1994, that it sought for the views of the dmet on the alleged poor hla matching and its implication on donor and donee. the dmet ..... set up by the state government under section 9(4)(b) of the toho act, 1994, which rejected the said application. the petitioners preferred an appeal before the appellate authority under section 17 of the toho act, 1994 and the said appellate authority affirmed the order of the authorisation committee and rejected the prayer of the petitioners on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2010 (HC)

Medical Sciences (Kims), PatiA. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... of the medical council of india (for short, 'the m.c.i.') addressed to the principal, kims, copy of which was endorsed to the registrar, utkal university and the authorities of the state.be it mentioned here that by an interim order passed by this court, the said six petitioners-students were permitted to appear in the ist year m ..... mistake and back out from the promise made by it if the other side has acted upon it. the court held as under: to attract the applicability of the principle of estoppel ..... a detriment but a benefit to him which he could have received on acting upon the promise made by the other side.in the case of state of orissa and others v. manglam timber products ltd. (2004) 1 scc 139, the supreme court has held that the statutory authority making a promise cannot be permitted to take the benefit of its own .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2001 (HC)

Dhanu Alias Dhanurdhar Sahu and anr. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2002(I)OLR164

..... village to lessen the tension. in view of the aforesaid pertinent circumstances, we are persuaded to arrive at a conclusion that though the appellant no. 1 is the author of the single stab injury, which caused death of a rival villager, he had no intention or premeditated plan to kill the deceased. the single injury was inflicted ..... not the only requirement, but what is required is, there must be sharing of common intention and meeting of minds. the prosecution has to establish that the criminal act was committed pursuant to a pre-arranged plan.23. the distinction between common intention and similar intention should be borne in mind, although the dividing line is rather ..... is admitted to evidence by way of an exception to general rule against admissibility of hear-say evidence on the principle of necessity. section 32 of the indian evidence act is an exception to the rule of hear-say. it makes the statement of a person, who dies, admissible in evidence, whether the death is homicidal or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1948 (PC)

Tirtha Naik and ors. Vs. Lal Sadananda Singh

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1952Ori99

..... the best evidence of facts stated therein, but opinions therein expressed should not be treated as conclusive in respect of matters requiring judicialdetermination, however eminent the authors of such reports may be. this was a case from the central provinces and the report on the zamindaris in the central provinces submitted to the ..... of hazarana. these provisions were later placed on the statute book by an amendment of section 60a, by section 3 of the central provinces land revenue act of 1898 (act xii of 1898). the question, therefore, is, having regard to these provisions, whether the conferment of protected status effected any change in the tenure of ..... sons had received equal shares with the eldest, according to private distribution, and the rule of primogeniture which was later introduced into the central provinces land revenue act, was then unknown among the 'kulta' families. the claims of the co-sharers in the gountia's 'bhogra' were, therefore, definitely recognised as early as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1951 (HC)

Pratap Kishore and anr. Vs. Gyanendranath

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1951Ori313

..... with great vigour has been established. it is difficult to believe that bhaghat charan was not depressed by the death of his brother or that he had developed such softness of mind that he readily agreed to pact with his property & introduce gyanedranath as the adopted son of nrusingho merely on a suggestion from lakshinidhar ..... accordingly, it cannot be contended that he passed the decree in the suit & thereby made himself ineligible to hear the appeal19. it was next argued that mr. coari had developed a bias against the pltfa. & was, therefore, incompetent to hear the appeal. this contention is sought to be rested on an order parsed by mr. coari, while subordinate ..... the' power is conferred to exercise that power, cases have held that where a statutory provision confers an an authority to do a judicial act in a certain case, id is imperative on those who are authorised to exercise that authority, when the case arises, & the exercise depends not on the discretion of the cts. or judges, but .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //