Court : Supreme Court of India
..... observed in the aforesaid decision that the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in some states had to suffer the social disadvantages and did not have the facilities for development and growth, and therefore, in order to make them equal in those areas where they have so suffered and are in the state of underdevelopment, to ..... specifically observed that the possession is of puran singh. the learned trial court also observed that the possession is found to be with puran singh when the authorities went to deliver the possession to the respondent original plaintiff in pursuance to the order passed by the learned trial court. it is submitted that therefore the ..... vide order dated 25.04.1989 by giving benefit of compounding to the appellant original defendant on payment of compounding fees under section 13 of the rajasthan colonization act, 1954. [2.3]. feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the board of revenue, the respondent original plaintiff filed a writ petition before .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 201414 in exercise of powers conferred by section 5 of the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 199215. 2e. the stated writ petition preferred by the appellant came to be disposed of on 23.09.2014 whilst directing the competent authority to consider the refund claim of the appellant afresh after taking into account all ..... aspects of the matter and give fair opportunity to the appellant. 2f. pursuant to the remand order, the development ..... general of foreign trade udyog bhawan, new delhi policy circular no.16 (re-2012/2009-14) dated:15. h march, 2013 to, all regional authorities all development commissioners, sez. subject: clarification regarding ted refund where ted exemption is available. it has come to the notice of this directorate that some ras of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... a legal practitioner as his dr. having considered that no complicated legal question has been involved in the matter and the presenting officer appointed by the disciplinary authority is neither law officer nor a legal practitioner and keeping in mind the regulation 44 of regulation, 2010 on engagement of legal practitioner during the inquiry, the ..... ; the solemn nature of proceedings is taken away and would result in issues of orderliness as well as decorum when a disgruntled ex employee is enabled to act as defence representative; they may adopt delay tactics in departmental enquiry and may not permit completion page 24 of 27 of department enquiry within six months as ..... it is a matter of record that presently in almost all the pending disciplinary enquiries, most of the employees under enquiry are now asking for retired officials to act as drs. 3.9. it is submitted that aforesaid aspect has not at all been considered by the high court while permitting the respondent employee to allow .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... (see executive engineer, irrigation division, puri v. gangaram chhapolia, (1984) 3 scc627 secretary to government transport department, madras v. munusamy mudaliar, 1988 supp scc651 international authority of india v. k.d. bali, (1988) 2 scc360 s. rajan v. state of kerala, (1992) 3 scc608 indian drugs & pharmaceuticals v. indo-swiss ..... committee has commenced. 117. as observed hereinabove, the arbitral tribunal stationery purchase committee consisted of officers of the respondent-state. therefore, as per amendment act, 2015 sub-section (5) of section 12 read with seventh schedule, all of them have become ineligible to become arbitrators and to continue as arbitrators ..... sahkari sangh limited (supra) is not applicable. it is submitted that in the said case, the arbitrator was appointed after amendment of the arbitration act, 2015. however, in the present case, the arbitrator was appointed approximately 20 years prior thereto and thereafter the arbitration 9 proceedings commenced and even the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... judge dismissing the suit i.e. cs no.79/2006 of m/s. sibco investment pvt ltd (for short sibco) was reversed. the suit was filed against small industries development bank of india (sidbi) seeking interest on the alleged belated payment of principal sum and accrued interest to the plaintiff for the bonds issued by sidbi.3. the question ..... relevant orders/directions are effectively followed. 8.14 based on the discussion above, the rbi under ss. 45-mb of the rbi act, 1934 and 35-a of the banking regulation act, 1949 in our understanding has the requisite authority to issue the communication dated 09th june, 1997. the omission by the rbi to mention any enabling provision, doesn t change ..... [reportable]. in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.8 of2022(arising out of slp(c) no.6533 of 2020) small industries development bank of india appellant(s) versus m/s. sibco investment pvt. ltd. respondent(s) with civil appeal no.9 of2022(arising out of slp(c) no.2876 of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of kerala, the government of any other state or of any union territory, or any local authority whatever be its total turnover for the year in respect of goods included in the schedule at the rate mentioned against such goods, (a) (b) in respect of ..... of a non resident dealer or the central government, or government of kerala or the government of any other state or of any union territory, or any local authority) whose total turnover for a year is not less than two lakhs rupees and every casual trader or agent of a non resident dealer, the central government, government ..... such, the inevitable conclusion, therefore is that it qualifies as an exclusive levy attracting section 40(a)(iib) of the act. to show that the distinction between a tax and a fee has substantially been effaced in the development of constitutional jurisprudence, learned counsel, has placed reliance on a recent judgment of this court 15 [email protected] .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as implementation does not interfere with its statutory duty.22. this court in sethi auto service station vs delhi development authority & ors3, speaking through justice d.k. jain, has cited other opinions and elucidated on the concept ..... a prior ec. thereafter, for the proposed expansion of the project, for total constructed area of 49,012 sq. mtrs., the project proponent approached the concerned authority on 7.11.2016 for issuance of proposed development certificate , which is a prerequisite to apply for ec, and the said certificate was granted on 28.11.2016 for the purpose of obtaining the ec .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... under section 6 on 1.5.1981. the possession came to be taken and handed over to the meerut development authority in july, 1982. it is in these circumstances that the notification under section 17 of the act was challenged. this court distinguished narayan govind gavate (supra) in the following words: ..the provision of housing ..... purpose, there was no urgency justifying invoking the power under section 17 (4) of the act.18. in anand singh case (supra), a bench of two learned judges dealt with an acquisition for a residential colony for the gorakhpur development authority. the notification was issued under section 4 in 2003 and 2004. by the said notifications ..... no.1 also issued notification dated 9.4.2009 invoking section 17(4) of the act.3. a short counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the 2nd respondent authority. therein the case set up is as follows: the development authority under the notifications issued under 2004 and 2005 has constructed roads and dividers for approaching all .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... section 33 (identification of posts for reservation), section 34 (reservation), section 36 (special employment exchange) and section 37 (special schemes and development programmes). chapter vii contains special provisions for persons with benchmark disabilities in need of high support. thus, the concept of benchmark disabilities has ..... visual impairment c. hearing impairment d. speech & language disability 2. intellectual a. specific disability learning disabilities (perceptual disabilities, dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia, dyspraxia & development aphasia) b. autism spectrum disorders [ ..]. (emphasis supplied) 15 appendix viii-b provides for a list of authorised centres for the issuance of disability certificates ..... disability has been defined in measurable terms, as certified by the certifying authority; the concept of benchmark disabilities is thus specifically with reference to the provisions of chapter vi of the rpwd act 2016. in contrast with the definition in section 2(r), the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 4. abatement of legal proceedings. all proceedings relating to any order made or purported to be made under the principal act pending immediately before the commencement of this act, before any court, tribunal or other authority shall abate: provided that this section shall not apply to the proceedings relating to sections 11, 12, 13 and ..... proceedings relating to any order made or purported to be made under the principal act (act, 1976) pending immediately before the commencement of the repeal act, 1999, before any court, tribunal or other authority shall abate. section 4 of the repeal act shall not apply provided possession of land has been taken over by the state ..... respondents herein original writ petitioners original land owners and has quashed and set aside the orders passed by the competent authority under the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the act, 1976 ) declaring ac. 0.865-7 area of the land as excess vacant land under the provisions of .....
Tag this Judgment!