Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2007SC401; 2007(1)CTLJ177(SC); 2006(13)SCALE300; (2007)2SCC588; 2006AIRSCW6304; 2007(1)KCCRSN22
..... court therein was dealing with a master plan in the light of justifiability of exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under the town planning act. having regard to the provisions contained in sub-section (4) of section 19 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 as also the fact that the discretionary jurisdiction had been arbitrarily exercised, this court invoked the 'public trust doctrine' saying that ..... s.b. sinha, j.1. leave granted.2. the mumbai metropolitan region development authority (for short, the authority') was created under the mumbai metropolitan region development authority act, 1974 ('the act'). it conceptualized the idea of establishing a convention and exhibition center ('c&ec;). pursuant thereto and in furtherance thereof it called for 'expression of interest for development of c&ec;' in bandra kurla complex. an advertisement was issued .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2006SC1325; 127(2006)DLT226; JT2006(2)SC448; 2006(2)SCALE364; (2006)3SCC399
..... arrears of land revenue.(iii) in all cases of illegal constructions, prosecution should invariably be launched against builders under the delhi municipal corporation act, delhi development authority act, new delhi municipal council act, etc. and the cases followed vigorously with the police authorities/courts.(iv) wherever the property is on lease, action should be taken under the terms and conditions of lease agreement and re-entry ..... sub-section (1) of section 12. so long as an area is a development area, the power to deal with it remains with the 'authority' which means delhi development authority in terms of section 3(1) of the act. after the responsibility of any area has been assumed by the local authority in the manner provided in section 36, the power to deal with properties in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : (2012)1SCC138; 2012(1)SCJ722
..... estimated cost of the scheme and area is reserved for garden, playground and civic amenity sites, as per sub section (c) and (d) of section 16 of the karnataka urban development authorities act 1987. hence, requested for according administrative approval for the said scheme. government order in no.hud/446/mib, bangalore, dated 9th june 1994.after considering the proposal of the letter ..... amenity area earmarked in the scheme without the orders of the government.21. the above noted provisions are pari materia to sections 15, 16, 17 and 19 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, which were interpreted in bondu ramaswamy's case. an argument similar to the one made before us was rejected by three-judge bench by making the following observations:the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2008ACJ2399; 2008(5)ALLMR(SC)928; (2008)3CALLT1(SC); (2008)3GLR2356(SC); (2008)5MLJ1006(SC); (2008)151PLR644; 2008(7)SCALE377; (2008)10SCC404; 2008AIRSCW7532; AIR2009SC446; 2008AIRSCW7532
..... on business principles and where any directions have been issued by the central government or the insurance regulatory and development authority established under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the insurance regulatory and development authority act, 1999 (41 of 1999) shall be guided by such directions.(4) ...15. `prospects' has been ..... conferred upon it by clause 2(c) of section 114 of the 1938 act.the parliament also enacted the insurance regulatory and development authority act, 1999. by the 1999 act the parliament inserted section 24a in the 1972 act directing cessation of the exclusive privilege of the corporation and the acquiring companies in ..... agent or insurance intermediary in terms of these regulations may enable the authority to initiate action against each or all of them, jointly or severally, under the act and/or the insurance regulatory and development authority act, 1999.17. indisputably the authority also issued guidelines on 'file and use' requirements for general insurance .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2005SC894; JT2005(1)SC507; 2005(3)KarLJ17; (2005)3SCC91; (2005)2UPLBEC1264
..... grant licences to the owners of the sites to build multi-storeyed and multi-family dwelling units. it was alleged that the scheme under the city of bangalore improvement act, 1945 and bangalore development authority act, 1976 provided for construction of residential houses and not for exploitation of those sites for construction of buildings in violation of law and with the object of inflating ..... rules of 1964 have been repealed and they have been replaced by the bangalore development authority act 1976, and the bangalore development authority (allotment of sites ) rules. 1982. the entire controversy centers around these acts and the rules. the third act with which we are concerned is the karnataka municipal corporations act 1976. under this act the bangalore municipal corporation granted permission to the appellant for raising one plus .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2001SC1885; JT2001(4)SC497; 2001(3)SCALE175; (2001)4SCC227
..... 4394-4410/88 before the high court of karnataka at bangalore contending inter alia, that the bangalore development authority (the bda) had no sanction under section 29 of the bangalore development authority act, (for short 'the bda act') to levy any tax, cess or fee on the owners of lands and buildings situated outside the ..... corporation limits of the bangalore city corporation. they had also contended that section 29 of the act was unconstitutional, ultra vires and void ..... division bench, an ordinance was promulgated which later became an act of the legislature whereby the principal bda act came to be amended by the bangalore development authority (amendment) act, 1993. by this amending act, sections 28a 28b and 28c were incorporated in the said act. by these amendments, the bda was statutorily entrusted with the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : (SCSuppl)2005(4)CHN5; [2006(2)JCR142(SC)]; (2005)11SCC115
..... 21.05.1983 in her favour. that soon after coining to know about the sale made in favour of the appellant, a notice under section 64 of bangalore development authority act, ('the act') was got issued on 04.06.1988 to bda informing about the nature of wrong committed by it. it is her case that since the bda failed to ..... void?3. to what order and reliefs the parties are entitled to?additional issues1. whether the suit is bad for want of notice under section 64 of the bangalore development authority act.?2. whether the court fee paid is sufficient?3. whether the plaintiff is entitled to the declaration sought for?4. whether the plaintiff proves she is in lawful ..... an agreement of sale dated 17.11.1974 executed by the plaintiff and her son in favour of krishnappa. that by virtue of section 9 of bangalore development authority (3rd amendment) act, 1993 (karnataka act no. 17/1994) plaintiff cannot challenge the sale deed dated 21.03.1983 executed by the bda in favour of the appellant. it was held .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2008SC3035; III(2008)CPJ71(SC); [2009(1)JCR49(SC)]; JT2008(8)SC403; (2008)8MLJ193(SC); 2008(10)SCALE458; 2008AIRSCW5103
..... numbered 883) measuring 14 marlas in sector 13 of the urban estate at karnal under the provisions of the punjab urban estate (development and regulation) act, 1964, which was repealed by the haryana urban development authority act, 1997. the said plot was subsequently transferred to the respondent herein, shri raj singh rana, as will be evident from ..... entitled to charge such compound interest.5. it is against the said order of the national commission that this appeal has been filed by the haryana urban development authority (hereinafter referred to as 'huda').6. on behalf of the huda it was strenuously urged that the rate of interest @ 17 per cent per annum ..... of the interest act in awarding the high rate of interest, without linking the same to the current rate of interest. as was mentioned in balbir singh's case, and, thereafter, in huda v. prem kumar agarwal and anr. : 2008(1)scale484 ; bihar state housing board v. arun dakshy : air2005sc3483 ; haryana urban development authority v. manoj .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2002SC665; 2003(1)BLJR96; [2002(1)JCR388(SC)]; JT2002(1)SC254; (2002)1PLR799; 2002(1)SCALE227; (2002)2SCC256; [2002]1SCR359
..... are stated in the succeeding paragraphs. it appears that the suit premises have been constructed by haryana urban development authority (huda, for short), governed by the provisions of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977 (the act, for short). the premises have been allotted by huda to the plaintiff-respondent and the latter is ..... required to pay certain instalments to huda and a failure in payment of instalments renders the allotment liable to cancellation with recovery of arrears, imposition of penalty and resumption of possession under section 17 of the act ..... huda directly in favour of the appellant. in view of the order of the estate officer having been set aside by the appellate authority under the act the allotment made by huda in favour of the respondent continues to subsist. his title, under which he had inducted the appellant in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : (SCSuppl)2007(4)CHN105; JT2007(11)SC284; 2007(11)SCALE129; (2007)10SCC491; 2007AIRSCW7069
..... the layout plan. it would also have the effect of upsetting development control and planning norms. with reference to delhi development authority act, 1957 (in short the 'act') it was observed that the said act envisaged preparation of a master plan, zonal development plan and at the lowest level of planning the lay out plan. development code under the master plan reveals that in the lay out plan ..... decided on 3.12.2004. the basic issue was whether sub-division of land was permissible. the prayer in the writ petition was that direction be issued to the delhi development authority (in short 'dda') to sanction conversion of the appellant's share in the plot from leasehold to freehold. stand of the appellant was that he was a co-sharer. since .....
Tag this Judgment!