Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 18 powers and functions of finance committee Page 1 of about 1 results (0.076 seconds)

Jul 27 2016 (HC)

M. Sankaranarayanan Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, ...

Court : Chennai

..... with identical averments, would contend that the writ petitions are not maintainable. according to the learned counsel, kalakshetra foundation is an autonomous body under the ministry of culture, government of india and it is governed by the kalakshetra foundation act, 1993. the recruitment to various posts in the foundation is governed by the recruitment rules. it is further stated that there is only one post of deputy ..... director exists in the foundation which is next to the post of director. it is an important administrative post. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2012 (HC)

Sai Sankar, Asst. Professor in Music, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai and Other ...

Court : Chennai

..... foundation for its administration, to make provisions for further development of kalakshetra in accordance with the aims and objects for which kalakshetra was founded, the central government came out with an act known as the kalakshetra foundation act, 1993 [hereinafter referred to as the act]. as per section 4 of the act, on the commencement of the act ..... , the right, title and interest in relation to the assets and properties of kalakshetra specified in ..... office, whether the resignation could be allowed to be withdrawn by the central government. 20. admittedly, there is no provision in the kalakshetra foundation act enabling the director to resign or providing for acceptance of resignation or withdrawal of resignation. therefore, one has to seek recourse to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1986 (HC)

S. Guhan and ors. Vs. Rukmini Devi Arundale and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1988Mad1

..... produced by rspondents. in the letter dt. 2-5-1984, written to union ministry for education and culture, in para 4 it is stated that kalakshetra is a society registered under act xxi of 1860 and is managed by an executive committee with rukmani devi as president and that movable and immovable properties belonging to the society are ..... evidentiary admissions. the former class of admissions are fully binding on the party that makes them and constitute a waiver of proof. they by themselves can be made the foundation of the rights of the parties. on the other hand, evidentiary admissions which are receivable at the trial as evidence, are by themselves, not conclusive. they can ..... imposed on the trust without itself being heard. this point itself would sufficent to dispose of the appeal, but proceedings in court are such that even when basic foundation for the entire proceeding is not made out, still all other points raised will have to be dealt with.16. does the plaint as filed comply' with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 2009 (HC)

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , sagard. the heads of the following non-government membersorganisations:1. janadhwani vedike,field marshal kariappa road, somwarpet2. vrukshalaksha andolana seva trust, sagara3. nature conservation foundation, mysoree. the following eminent conservationists, membersecologists, and environmentalists:1. k.b. girish ganapati2. keregundi estate, devapura post,gonekoppa3. sanjay gubbi, tumkur4. girija ..... safeguards were taken by government of india in 1980 by constituting tiwari committee, which recommended for establishment of department of environment to act as a nodal agency for environment protection eco-development in the country, for comprehensive review and recommendations, not covered by the ..... appointing honorary wildlife wardens. the latest order appointing honorary wildlife wardens was issued on 22-02-2007 and 02-08-2007.wildlife act, section 21 - final notification -government of karnataka has issued final notifications for all the 5 national parks and 21 wildlife sanctuaries .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1965 (HC)

Sadhu Singh S. Jiwan Singh Vs. Shamsher Singh Josh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1965P& H457

..... the full support of akali dal. those who cast their votes in favour of s. shamsher singh josh, they will get true happiness of the guru and make the foundation of the punjabi suba strong. khalsa j you should remember at shri guru kalgidhar, the tenth guru demands your votes for protection of the sikhism and for getting punjab suba ..... through the evidence and the judgment of the learned tribunal. in common with court s of appeal this court also under s. 116a of the representation of the people act does not reverse conclusions of fact based on oral evidence merely on the ground that a different conclusion than the one arrived at by the election tribunal might well have ..... religious elections in our set-up. but we are here only concerned with the intention of the parliament in enacting s. 123(3) of the representation of the people act, and this provision only taboos appeal for a vote on the ground of the candidate's religion or language, and if the appeal does not encroach on the prohibited .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2019 (HC)

M/S Ncr Developers vs.university of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... for any reason that was not possible, there could not be any reference for arbitration at all. in essence what the condition says is that the foundation of the arbitration agreement itself is appointment by the executive director, in the manner contemplated. if this condition which is fundamental to the arbitration agreement itself ..... has relied upon the following judgments of this court as well as the supreme court: i. nandyal coop. spinning mills ltd. v. k.v. mohan rao (1993) 2 scc654ii. nav nirman construction company v. executive engineer cd-ix, irrigation and flood control department, gnctd2011scc online del 3948 iii. indian oil corporation ltd. v. ..... supplied) 16. pertinently, in ansal buildwell limited case (supra), this court in a petition filed by the aggrieved party under section 11(6) of the act noticed the arbitration clause containing a similar condition upheld the right of the respondent to appoint the arbitrator and declined to appoint an independent arbitrator holding as under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //