Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 15 academic committee Year: 2010 Page 6 of about 647 results (0.500 seconds)

Marico Limited Vs. Agro Tech Foods Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : LC2010(2)14

..... this, and in the absence of authority, i should be most hesitant in accepting evidence regarding trap orders untested by cross-examination as a reasonably sure foundation on which to grant an interlocutory injunction. an authority has been called to my attention which clearly shows that evidence given by those responsible for trap orders ..... the provisions sub-section (1) of section 28 would show that the rights conferred by registration of a mark is subject to: firstly, other provisions of the act, and secondly, the exclusive right conferred on the registered proprietor or permitted user is circumscribed by the expression 'if valid'. similarly, section 30 in particular sub ..... application was withdrawn upon an examination report issued by the trade mark registrar after taking into consideration the provisions of section 9 of the trade marks act, wherein are contained grounds for refusal of registration of the mark sought by an applicant. in the alternative it is pleaded that the plaintiff has .....

Punjab National Bank Thr. Its Branch Manager Vs. Shaikh Jumman Shaikh ...

Court : Mumbai

..... injunction in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under the said act or under the recovery of debts due to the banks and financial institutions act, 1993. as pointed out earlier, the suit filed by plaintiff being simplicitor for injunction, the same is, therefore, covered by ..... filed the present civil revision application. mr. anilkumar, the learned counsel for the appellant/ defendant has referred to the provisions of section 13(1) of the said act, to urge that any security interest, created in favour of the secured creditors, is required to be enforced without intervention of the court or tribunal, by such ..... the second part of section 34, which prohibits the court or other authority from granting injunction in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of the power conferred by or under the act .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2010(3)SC420

..... judicata. the grounds sought to be added in the memorandum of arbitration appeal by way of amendment are absolutely new grounds for which there is no foundation in the application for setting aside the award. obviously, such new grounds containing new material/facts could not have been introduced for the first time in ..... tribunal exceeded jurisdiction in awarding revision of percentage for hidden expenses over-heads and profits for further additional items (claim no. 1); that the arbitral tribunal acted beyond the scope of arbitration with regard to extended stay charges (claim no. 2); the arbitral tribunal exceeded jurisdiction and, in fact, committed error of ..... final payment which was made on march 30, 2001 after completion of maintenance period); (iii) delay (claims are time barred under the provisions of the limitation act); (iv) laches (respondent's arbitrator was not appointed before expiry of 30 days from the defect liability and, therefore, the claimant was not entitled to bring .....

Leela Gupta and ors.Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the case of susamma thomas2 arose out of the 1939 act and the appeal was decided by this court on january 6, 1993. the 1939 act stood repealed by the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short, `the 1988 act'). after decision of this court in susamma thomas2 , the 1988 act was amended and, inter alia, section 163a was inserted along ..... .e.f. november 14, 1994. vide section 163a, the special provisions with regard to payment of compensation on structured formula basis were introduced in the 1988 act and the second schedule provided for compensation for third party fatal accident/injury cases claims. under the second schedule, the maximum multiplier could be upto 18 and ..... and one-fifth (1/5th) where the number of dependent family members exceeds six."with regard to multiplier in the cases falling under section 166 of 1988 act, this court held that davies12 method is applicable and set out the following table:age of the multiplier multiplier multiplier multiplier multiplier deceased scale as scale as .....

Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... state government on the ground that the area applied by them has overlapped with the area granted to one sri rangangoud and nine others. on 11.12.1993, the company challenged the above decision of the state government by filing a revision petition before the government of india, ministry of coal and mines, new ..... public interest that the union should take under its control the regulation of mines and the development of minerals to the extent herein after provided.3. definitions:-in this act, unless the context otherwise requires:--a. "minerals" includes all minerals except mineral oils; b. .......c. "mining lease" means a lease granted for the purpose ..... to the above said notification notwithstanding the earlier recommendation made by the second respondent." learned senior counsel appearing for jindal submitted that the state government had acted on the basis of the ziaulla sharieff's case and empowered the director of mines and geology to hear applications that were filed prior to the .....

Ramadhar @ Pappan KhampariA. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... also confirmed by dehati nalishi ex.p-1, which was immediately lodged by the complainant to the concerned head constable, and therefore, these witnesses are reliable and the act of the appellant-accused is proved.15. on the other hand, learned counsel for the appellant-accused has submitted that dehati nalishi was not at all an fir in ..... be presumed of causing death of the complainant, and therefore, it can safely be said that offence under section 307 of ipc is not made out. the overt-act of the assailant at the most may constitute an offence under section 324 of ipc.13. for assessing the testimony of the complainant, entire evidence may be considered. ..... by the parties, the learned special judge, chhattarpur acquitted the appellant-accused for commission of offence under sections 25/27 of the arms act and section 3 (2) (v) of sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989, but convicted him for commission of offence under section 307 of ipc and inflicted the aforesaid sentence.7. i have heard .....

Jayaram SwaIn and ors.Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... therefore, the company is presently having three directors on its board and less than seven members as required for a public limited company under section 12 (b) of the act. as the foundation has not produced the altered memorandum and articles of association of the company, and the same are not available in the office of the registrar of companies at mumbai ..... in the case of s.p. gupta v. union of india & anr., air 1982 sc 149; and decisions of the supreme court in janata dal v. h.s. chowdhary, air 1993 sc 892; indian council for enviro-legal action v. union of india & ors., (1996) 5 scc 281; and state of uttaranchal v. balwant singh choufal, (2010) 3 scc 402 ..... individuals. in such cases, a member of the public having sufficient interest can certainly maintain an action challenging the legality of such act or omission. in the case of janata dal v. h.s. chowdhary, reported in air 1993 sc 892, the supreme court taking note of the observations made in the case of s.p. gupta (supra) and number .....

Siel Foods and Fertilizers Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE315

..... of within three years; that there was an obligation on the `h' category industries to shift and relocate in terms of the master plan by the year 1993; and that all possible opportunities were given to the industries and upon assessment of the situation through the appointments of commissions and obtaining the consent of various parties ..... this court directed that their land should be surrendered, it was clearly implied that the dda would have to acquire the land under section 15 of the delhi development act, 1957 and pay compensation for the land. after considering the contentions, this court by order dated 28.4.2000 (reported in : 2000 (5) scc 525), ..... swatantra bharat mills and dcm silk mills filed interlocutory applications praying for a direction to dda to acquire the land required to be surrendered under the dda act or land acquisition act and to restrain dda from trying to expropriate their lands. the request was turned down and ias were dismissed as withdrawn.7. thereafter, m.c. .....

Sri. A.S. Parameshwaraiah and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by Its ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2010KAR997

..... did not had any standing committee as on 08.06.1983. it was stated that, the appellants have deliberately kept silent about the resolution dated 08.06.1993 of the finance committee, which was chaired by none other than the 1st appellant, who by virtue of his position as the chairman of the finance committee ..... the appellants, certainly amounts to suppression of material facts. the appellants despite having the knowledge of the proceedings and the records, noticed supra, have indulged in act of suppression and hence, the learned single judge is justified in observing that there is misadventure on the part of the writ petitioners of 'suppressio veri et ..... having indulged in a misadventure of 'suggestio falsi and suppressio veri,' must suffer the consequence. further, having regard to the provisions contained in section 72 of the act and rule 39 of the karnataka municipalities (guidance of officers, grant of copies and miscellaneous provisions) rules, 1966 and the decision in the case of mohan, p .....

Sangita Shah Parent/Guardian of Ativ Shah Poonam and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court : Mumbai

..... policies of other universities. the way merit has been made a martyr by the institutional reservation policy of aiims, the high hopes on which rests the foundation of aiims are belied. no sound and sensible mind can accept scores of 1520% being declared as passed, crossing over the queue and arraigning themselves above ..... circumstances and when both the cbse and icse boards being in existence atleast from 1959 and 1963 so also their students being treated equally atleast from 1993 by the state of maharashtra is something which would falsify the case of the state now put forward that there are different sources from which these ..... (school education and sports department), mantralaya, mumbai - 32.. select file (hse - 2)(b) corrigendum dated 16th june 2010 reads thus:'regarding the amendment in the act pertaining to 'best five' in the secondary school certificate (10th standard) examination being conducted by maharashtra state secondary and higher secondary education board, to be made applicable .....