Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Dec-03-2010
..... 8 i.e. the special land acquisition officer averred on oath that the objections were called under section 5-a of the act and accordingly the objector filed the same on 9-7-1993, hearing was accorded by the divisional commissioner to the affected party and accordingly on 24-6-1994 the objections raised by the ..... .1748 of 2008 is still pending admission hearing of this court.9) the petitioner contends that notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act was issued on 9-3-1993 in respect of the subject plot. the special land acquisition officer had called for objections. accordingly, the petitioner submitted his objections on 7-4 ..... collector and accordingly the proceedings were initiated. section 4 notification initially was published on 19th march 1993. notification under section 6 of the land acquisition act was published in gazette no.44 dated 4-11-1993, aurangabad times dated 15-10-1993, daily deogiri tarun bharat dated 16-10-1997 and village publication was made on 4-12 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Dec-20-2010
..... in pursuance of the powers conferred by or under the said legislation or under the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993. moreover, section 35 of the securitization act provides that the provisions of the said legislation shall override other laws and shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other ..... authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this act or under the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993."18. section 34 provides that no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceedings in respect of any ..... taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this act or under the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993". accordingly, it is submitted that bar under section 34 of the securitization act is related to matters, cognizance of which is to be taken by the drt or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Oct-27-2010
..... that effect, but those representations were not considered by respondent no.1 and 2. it is also contended that the first respondent had submitted proposals respectively dated 23/03/1993, and 14/11/1993 to respondent no.2 for promotion of petitioner from 19/02/1990, instead from 21/03/1985 and for re fixation of pay scale. respondent no.2 had ..... from duties.e. the respondent no.5 may kindly be directed to hold inquiry against the respondent no.1 and 2 regarding their mis management, irregularities, corrupt practices, acting as a dictator not acting as per law and directions of the higher authorities and to punish them accordingly.2. it appears that rule was issued in this writ petition on 14/09 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Aug-18-2010
..... fact, having a bearing on the charge which may be made against him, he may appropriately be deemed so have surrendered himself to the police. the broad foundation of this rule is stated to be that section 46 of the code of criminal procedure does not contemplate any formality before a person can be said to be ..... the investigating agency can make a reasonable claim that it can secure incriminating material from information likely to be received from the offender under section 27 of the evidence act. according to the high court, it is the right and the duty of the police to investigate into offences brought to their notice and, therefore, courts ..... arrested or imprisoned, on security being taken for his appearance'. thus, bail is basically release from restraint, more particularly, release from the custody of the police. the act of arrest directly affects freedom of movement of the person arrested by the police, and speaking generally, an order of bail gives back to the accused that freedom on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Jul-23-2010
..... corroborate the testimony of pw 1 dashabai complainant, and her sole testimony which is not truthful, cannot be believed and same cannot be construed as basis and foundation for the conviction of appellant herein and consequently, submitted that the appellant herein is entitled for benefit of doubt and he be acquitted, setting aside the ..... learned counsel for the appellant relied upon observations made by honourable supreme court in the case of anil phukan v/s state of assam reported at air 1993 sc 1462 wherein it is observed that :"where the alleged single eye witness being a close relative of deceased was an interested witness and though alleged to ..... the version of pw 1 dashabai complainant to be base the conviction against the appellant since her testimony is not free from doubt so that it can be acted upon without insisting for corroboration, as discussed hereinabove.25. in the circumstances, considering the infirmities, deformities and lacunae in the prosecution case, i have no .....
Tag this Judgment!