Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 11 the governing board Page 7 of about 5,265 results (0.250 seconds)

Committee of Management, Dau Dayal Mahila Post Graduate College Vs. St ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC481; (2005)1UPLBEC554

..... the secondary level- in order to provide for a planned development system throughout the country the parliament enacted the national council for teachers education act, 1993 (being act no. 73 of 1993). with the enforcement of the aforesaid act the establishment of professional institutions for the purposes of imparting education of teachers training, namely b.ed. ect, has been regulated under ..... amendments which have been effected in the aforesaid order of 1987 are prior of the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of t.m.a. pai foundation of karnataka, 2002 (8) scc 481: (2002) 3 uplbec 2817 (sc), and farther the said order of 1987 and amendments made thereafter do not in any ..... 251 (sc), are being reproduced herein below:--'having regard to the totality of the circumstances and the law laid down by this court in t.m.a. pai foundation case, we are of the view that the suggestion on behalf of the colleges that the management quota sets shall be allowed to be filled on the basis of .....

V.S.R. Murthy and ors. Vs. Engineer-in-chief (irrigation Wing), I and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(5)ALT696

..... in this article. there can be no doubt that it is a founding faith of the constitution. it is indeed the pillar on which rests securely the foundation of our democratic republic. and, therefore, it must not be subjected to a narrow, pedantic or lexicographic approach. no attempt should be made to truncate its ..... is not complete, even then the terms of the scheme as envisaged under the act will be binding on all the parties to the scheme including the state government.13. under the sick industries (sic. industrial companies) (special provisions) amendment act, 1993 any scheme would be as good as a statute. such scheme is statutory in ..... rehabilitation payment to be paid to them.3. the tenor of the counter-affidavit further shows that the cabinet subcommittee while submitting its report in february, 1993 merely recommended re-deployment of 1486 surplus employees in government departments, public sector undertakings as an interim measure and that the government should constitute a committee to .....

M.L. Sondhi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 97(2002)DLT99; 2002(63)DRJ482; 2003(1)SLJ19(Delhi)

..... science research, to sponsor research programme in science and coordinate research activities in the said field, which could have been done by any charitable trust or foundation. the icssr, an autonomous institution, consisting of several members of the council, receives grants from the government as well as from three other sources. reliance ..... of the icssr and the trust. after referring to the earlier decision of the apex court in om marain aggarwal v. nagar palika shahjahanpur, : [1993]2scr34 , the hon'ble supreme court unhesitatingly applied the pleasure doctrine as incorporated in section 6 of the said statute to reject the appeal of the removed ..... court drew the distinction between exercising the pleasure doctrine clearly reserved in section 6, and the stigmatic powers contained in section 10 of the nagpur improvement trust act, 1936. it favored the opinion that only if 'the removal caused stigma granting prior opportunity of being heard was essential. otherwise the 'removal' neither .....

National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited and ors. Vs. M.V.V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT689

..... reply to dpm's letter dated 13-6-2001.with reference to the above cited matter please include the following as claim to declare the withdrawing the foundation work of p7 to p9 and abutment from the contract on risk and cost basis is arbitrary, illegal and void.kindly do the needful and oblige.thanking ..... mehul construction company (3 supra) wherein, it was held that 'while discharging the functions under sub-section (6), the chief justice or his nominee will be acting in his administrative capacity. the order of the learned chief justice is also not sustainable in view of the decision rendered in union of india v. vijayalakshmi enterprises ..... and make his reasoned award regarding the claims/disputes raised by the claimant respondent and the counter claim of the petitioner. thereby the appointing authority has duly acted upon as required under clause 22 of the agreement. for all purposes the appointing authority has referred the disputes for adjudication to the arbitrator. the respondent sent .....

A. Nagappan and 8 Others Vs. M/S. Mc. Adams Chemicals Manufacturing Co ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC694; (1998)IIMLJ435

..... also held thatthe supreme court case would help the, plaintiff's in view of paragraph 14 and that the notice under section 43 of the act had been complied with.19. in venu alias venugopal v. jeya : (1993)2mlj434 , the learned judge has relied upon the facts of the apex court and states as follows:'mentioning of such a date would be ..... partnership. the partnership at will can continue when there is a will or wish among the partners to continue it. the will or intention is the foundation of the edifice of the partnership. when the foundation is lost or destroyed how the edifice can stand. the intention to continue the partnership by one or two partners tantamounts to only supporting poles to .....

D. K. Abdul Khader and Others Vs. Union of India and Others[Overruled]

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR1809; 2001(2)KarLJ534

..... a. the respondent-bank moved an application namely application under section 19 of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 i.e., act no. 51 of 1993 before the debt recovery tribunal at bangalore impleaded herein as respondent 4. this application was moved on 14-10-1997. according to the ..... justice, in paragraph 302, observes as under.-'the true position is that every provision of the constitution can be amended provided in the result the basic foundation and structure of the constitution remains the same. the basic structure may be said to consist of the following features: (1) supremacy of the constitution; ..... deprived of the same before thetribunal. provisions are therefore arbitrary and discriminatory. this challenge on behalf of the debtors-petitioners is totally unsustainable. the act 1993 has been introduced as seen from the statement to provide speedy remedy for recovery of debts, since there has been considerable difficulties experienced therefor. the .....

A.P. State Backward Class Welfare Association (Registered) and Etc. Et ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1995AP248; 1995(2)ALT1

..... the government has thought fit to enact a law on the specific subject of identifying andproviding reservations to backward classes.27. the andhra pradesh commission forbackward classes act, 1993 (a.p. act'20/,93)(hereinafter referred to as 'the act1) is, theoutcome of the judgment of the supremecourt in indra sawney v. union of india : air1993sc477 ..... impugned on five grounds, namely, (1) the g.o., is ultra vires of theprovisions of the andhra pradesh commission for the backward classes act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the a. p. act 20/93'), (2) the g.o., is issued by the state government without considering any material to support its issuance, (3) the ..... o. the counter-affidavit gave, of course, much more details as regards the percentage of literacy in the different communities, etc. thus, there is sufficient factual foundation laid in the counter-affidavit to save the g.o. from the present challenge. indra sawhney's case : air1993sc477 is again an authority in the present context .....

Maa Sharda Maha Vidyalaya Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)1UPLBEC784

..... the merit list. paragraph 7 of the said order deals with examinations for admission that were to be conducted by the university. the national council for teachers education act, 1993 came into force with effect from 1-7-1995. the n.c.t.e. thereafter took over form the state government/universities, the functions with regard to admission ..... is to be charged by them from their students was considered in detail by the 11 judges bench of the apex court in the case of t.m.a. pai foundation v. state of karnataka, air 2003 s.c. 355 : (2002) 8 scc 481 : (2002) 3 uplbec 2817 (sc). in the said judgment certain guidelines had been ..... undisputedly, earlier the admissions in the universities as well as colleges, such as those of the petitioners, were being governed by the provisions of section 28 of the universities act, which dealt with the setting up of admission committees by the universities. in pursuance thereof, the government had issued u.p. state universities (regulation of admission to courses .....

Welfare Association and ors. Vs. the State of Nagaland and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... contended that even if it be assumed that the alternative method of retirement by way of length of service is permissible in law, still the 2nd amendment act, 2009 1 1993 suppl. (2) scc 592prescribing retirement of government employees in the state on completion of 35 years of service is violative of article 14 of the constitution being ..... , therefore, the respondent desired to challenge the validity of the rule on the ground either of its unreasonableness or its discriminatory nature, he had to lay a foundation for it by setting out the facts necessary to sustain such a plea and adduce cogent and convincing evidence to make out his case, for there is a presumption ..... in our view, challenge to the impugned provision based on the aforesaid ground must fail. 47. as regards judgment of the gauhati high court dated january 18, 1993, suffice it to say that the said judgment does not lay down the correct legal position. that judgment is in direct conflict with the judgment of this court in .....

Delhi Administration and ors. Vs. Madan Lal Nangia and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC4672; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)79; 2004(1)AWC414(SC); 107(2003)DLT646(SC); JT2003(9)SC497; (2004)1MLJ102(SC); 2003(8)SCALE489; (2003)10SCC321; (2004)1UPLBEC648

..... arguments that the writ petitioners in challenging these notifications belatedly are guilty of laches and delay. in the case of ramjas foundation and ors. v. union of india and ors., 50 (1993) dlt 23, on similar grounds the belated challenge was negatived. so there is no merit in such a plea and ..... thus a writ petition challenging the scheme was filed. pending the writ petition a notification under section 12 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation act was issued, wherein all evacuee properties were acquired. the question before the court was whether the writ petition challenging the consolidation scheme was maintainable after the ..... such property. the central government can never acquire its own property. thus the very fact that section 12 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act provides for acquisition by the central government clearly indicates that evacuee properties are not properties of the central government. as they are not properties of the .....