Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 11 the governing board Court: punjab and haryana Page 9 of about 86 results (0.161 seconds)

Khajjan Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... courses were taken recourse to. similarly, the division bench at lucknow erroneously treated the verdict of allahabad bench not to be a binding precedent on the foundation that the principles laid down by the constitution bench in m. nagaraj (supra) are not being appositely appreciated and correctly applied by the bench when ..... welfare association v. union of india and anr., [1989]. 4 scc187 at. 241 and u.p. financial corporation v. gem cap (india) pvt. ltd., [1993]. 2 scc299 at 307, while judging whether the administrative action is arbitrary under article 14 (i.e. otherwise then being discriminatory, this court has confined itself to ..... writ court on affidavits without relegating the aggrieved persons to a less efficacious and protracted alternative remedy available under the machinery of the industrial disputes act, 1947 after such persons have secured reinstatement through industrial adjudication where findings have come that the termination or retrenchment was unlawful or illegal.25. .....

Trilok Nath Passey Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... may qualify as being punitive in character. the significant fact is of the use of the words on the face of the order that would indicate the foundation of premature retirement, the motive notwithstanding. the judgments never precedent that expression like found undesirable to be retained in government service or terming a person to be ..... misbehaviour. it is rather well settled that an order of compulsory retirement is not required to be a speaking order, see union of india v. dulal dutt; 1993 (4) sct 30 (sc). 21. the chief secretary, punjab accepted the collective opinion formulated by the multi member review committee consisting of senior officers of punjab ..... and appeal) rules, 1970 on the charge that he misused his powers while posted as sub divisional magistrate, khadur sahib-cum-registering authority under the motor vehicles act, 1988. in the inquiry the charge was proven. the petitioner was imposed a major penalty of withholding of 4 annual increments with cumulative effect at the end .....

Krishan Kumar NaIn Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... them the benefit of doubt .very often the courts use this expression as a safeguarding reflex while passing judgments of acquittal to voice reaffirmation of the jurisprudential foundation of our criminal law justice system which requires the highest standard of proof on the prosecution to bring home the criminal charge beyond reasonable shadow of doubt .this ..... found against him during reconciliation of the bin cards with price stores ledger. there were found other shortages as well. for these acts of omission and commission, the petitioner was charge sheeted on 8.10.1993 under rl.7 of the haryana civil services (punishment & appeal) rules, 1987. his explanation in reply to the charge sheet ..... the petitioner was working as a junior engineer in water services division, gohana. while kumar paritosh working in that circle, an fir no.8 dated 16.6.1993 was registered in police 2013.09.26 10:12 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.4287 of 2007 2 station, vigilance bureau .....

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. B.i.S. Chahal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2010)157PLR80

..... to purge the guilty of their offence; nor is it intended to operate as a universal panacea, but it is intended to be evidence of real contriteness'. in tma pai foundation and ors. v. state of karnataka : (1995)4 s.c.c. 1, the supreme court expressed its concern and observed that 'it is equally necessary to erase the ..... high court's extra-ordinary jurisdiction under article 215 of the constitution. as held by the hon'ble supreme court in pritam pal v. high court of madhya pradesh : 1993 supp.(1) s.c.c. 529, 'the jurisdiction vested is a special one not derived from any other statute' but derived only from article 215 and that 'the ..... inherent and plenary powers under article 215 of the constitution to punish for its contempt summarily. these powers cannot be tinkered with by legislation like the contempt of courts act, 1971. while exercising its jurisdiction under article 215 of the constitution, the high court may follow a procedure which is fair enough to afford a reasonable opportunity to .....

Present : Mr. Vinod Chaudhri Advocate Vs. Municipal Corporation, Chand ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to prefer civil suit as suggested was not followed or availed of and this writ petition has been brought pressing general principles of law without any factual foundation. the incident itself is a seriously disputed question of fact incapable of resolution in summary writ proceedings. though this court has no reason to disbelieve the ..... was complained of on the criminal side. the state commission relied upon various authorities including numerous decisions rendered in lucknot development authority versus m.k.gupta, iii(1993) cpj 7(sc) and the decision of the supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha, 2009 (3) cpc 21.to reach the ..... negligent in dismantling cement tanks and replacing them with plastic ones. the court held that the government department which owned the flats are vicariously liable for the acts of their contractor. in the same strain, mr.chaudhri would rely on another single bench judgment in chob singh versus government of nct of delhi and .....

The State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Harjinder Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1999)122PLR569

..... on the part of the disciplinary authority to furnish a copy of the report prior to serving the order of dismissal upon the plaintiff. this argument is totally without any foundation. if the state wishes to take advantage of 1970 rules governing the plaintiff then under rule 9(4) of the said rules the authority was obliged to provide the copy ..... he preferred an appeal against the said order of dismissal which was also dismissed by the appellate authority on 7.8.1991 as conveyed to the plaintiff on 18.1.1993. while dismissing the plaintiff from service, the disciplinary authority also concluded that the plaintiff would not be entitled to receive any amount over and above the amount paid i.e ..... fresh enquiry to be conducted by an other enquiry officer. it is conceded that rule 8 of 1970 rules does not give such power and the disciplinary authority had to act within the scope of rule 9(1) above reproduced.10. i am of the considered view that firstly the case of k.r. deb (supra) does not have a .....