Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 11 the governing board Court: punjab and haryana Page 8 of about 86 results (0.660 seconds)

Ram Niwas Bansal Vs. State Bank of Patiala and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1999)IILLJ126P& H; (1998)119PLR768

..... be accepted that a document prepared at the back of the petitioner, copy of which was admittedly not furnished to him, can be permitted to be a foundation of the order of punishment. such an action would certainly be contrary to fair play. this question is no more res integra and has been concluded by the ..... grant personal hearing to the delinquent. reliance was also placed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on the case of executive engineer v. rangadhar malik, 1993 i.s.j. (banking) 101 to argue that it was not necessary to grant hearing for which no statutory provisions had been provided. rejecting a representation for ..... accruing to the departmental authority from the afore-stated law laid down by the hon'ble apex court, presupposes and imposes corresponding obligation upon the departmental authority to act with greater caution and care, with due regard and adherence to the principles of natural justice. exercise of power by the authority concerned must be in harmony .....

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Ex-constable Jagraj Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)137PLR514

..... observed that 'even where an order of discharge looks innocuous, but on close scrutiny, by looking behind the curtain, and if any material exist of misconduct and, which is the foundation of passing of the order of discharge, or such could be reasonably inferred, then it leaves no room of doubt that any consequential order, even if discharge would be construed ..... , decided on july 28, 1992. they also reply upon single bench judgments in surinder kumar v. the state of haryana and ors., 1993(1) r.s.j. 754, jai bhagwan and anr. v. the state of haryana and anr., 1993(2) r.s.j. 286 and rajinder singh v. state of haryana and ors., 1989(1) s.l.r. 451 and some .....

Sher Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)106PLR456

..... the respondents had not disclosed the material on the government file on the basis of which the impugned order of discharge was passed. the only conclusion deducible is that the foundation of the order of discharge was the misconduct of the petitioner when he made obscene remarks to smt. nirmala devi on july 1, 1985. the pleas taken in the ..... passed by two different benches. civil writ petition no. 19637 of 1991 was referred to a larger bench by v.k. bali, j. vide order dated july 20, 1993. thereafter, a division bench of which two of us were members passed an order in c.w.p. no. 5569 of 1992 for placing the matter before a larger ..... also on any other data or information which may be available to the superintendent of police. this is, of course, subject to the condition that the superintendent of police cannot act arbitrarily. the opinion should not be whimsical. the opinion, though subjective, has to be formed on some objective date. so long as this requirement is fulfilled, the action .....

Raju Sharma Vs. Pardeep Kumar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1999)121PLR612

..... procedural law must be moulded to farther cause of justice rather than frustrate the same. non production of documents after exercise of due diligence appears to be very foundation for filing such an application. compliance of this condition must be seen in context to the facts and circumstances of the case and in conformity with the record ..... additional evidence are the map sanctioned by the municipal committee, narnaul dated 10.3.1972, rent deeds dated 4.12.1989, 28.2.1990, and dated 7.7.1993. the petitioner also wishes to produce the judgment dated 17.12.1991 passed by sub judge, ist glass, mahendergarh. according to the petitioner these documents have a direct ..... present revision petitions before this court. cr 1956 of 1998 has been filed alongwith an application (cm 5394 cll of 1998) under section 5 of the indian limitation act praying for condonation of 49 days delay in filing the revision.2. after passing of the order on or about march, 1998, the defendants filed an application under .....

Present : Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram Senior Advocate with Vs. Board of Control ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , while suspicion of bias would be the probability or reasonable suspicion of bias. the former lead to vitiation of action, while the latter could hardly be the foundation for further examination of action with reference to the facts and 45 c.m.no.15703 of 2012 in cwp no.14585 of 2011 circumstances of a given case ..... be, represent the state and its authority unlike the bureaucracy or the members of the other services. while referring to all india judges association vs. union of india (1993) 4 scc 288.the court observed as under: 13. ..the judges do not do an easy job. they repeatedly do what the rest of us seek to avoid ..... great extent on the fact and circumstances of that case, the framework of the statute under which the enquiry is held. the old distinction between a judicial act and an administrative act has withered away. even an administrative order which involves civil consequences must be consistent with the rules of natural justice. the expression civil consequences . encompasses .....

Ms. Karuna Vs. Government Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... meritorious students alone. in order to produce good doctors, the merit alone should be the basis of selection for the candidates. the apex court in tma pai foundation v. state of karnataka (2002) 8 scc 48.also in no uncertain terms said that merit would be the first criterion for imparting professional education. in other ..... cbse v. ku. sheena peeth ambaran and others (2003) 7 scc 719.26. a three judges bench in guru nanak dev university v. parminder kr. bansal (1993) 4 scc 40.relating to academic matters noted as follows:- we are afraid that this kind of administration of interlocutory remedies, more guided by sympathy quite often wholly misplaced ..... down by the indian medical council. for example, the medical qualifications granted by a university or a medical institution have to be recognised under the indian medical council act, 1956. unless the qualifications are so recognised, the students who qualify will not be able to practice. before granting such recognition, a power is given to .....

Daya Nand Dalal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1999)122PLR245

..... that the petitioner has approached the court with tainted hands and, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence.25. in civil writ petition no 15448 of 1993 jai bhagwan jain v. haryana state electricity board, panchkula, a division bench of this court took note of the growing tendency among the litigants to pollute ..... who had concealed the fact that the award was not made by the land acquisition officer within the time specified in section 11a of the land acquisition act on account of interim stay order passed in a writ petition. while. rejecting the special leave petition, their lordships of the supreme court observed :-'curiously enough ..... case of non-application of mind or consideration of extraneous material. no doubt, the annual confidential reports do not contain many adverse entries but the various acts of financial irregularities committed by the petitioner, for which he has been punished by the competent authority, have been rightly taken into consideration by the committee .....

Sri Guru Ram Das Charitable Hospital Trust and ors. Vs. State of Punja ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)136PLR99

..... the law laid down by the supreme in the case of unnikrishnan j.p. and ors. v.state of a.p. and ors., (1993)4 s.c.c. 111. the supreme court in the case of tmapai foundation and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors., j.t. 2002(9) s.c. 1,(hereinafter referred to as 'tma pai case ..... on the pleas that:- a) the respondents have no power to alter substantially or otherwise indicating criteria for admission provided under the brochure, once it has been notified and acted upon; b) the impugned notification not only diminishes but completely destroys the basic precept for admission to such course i.e., rule of merit. not only diminishing but completely ..... policy, if any. ix)children of november, 1984 riot affecteddisplaced persons, children of the innocent civilians killed or 100% disabledin terrorist violence or during operation by the security forces acting inaid of civil power.1%59. the total of these reservation came to 40%. thereafter, 15% seats had been reserved for the all india quota and 15% for .....

Present: Mr.Ashok Aggarwal Sr.Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... released from the forest department and thereafter, acquired on 15.05.1972 under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short, the 'act'), for public purpose, for setting up an educational complex. possession was delivered to the foundation on 24.01.1974 and it paid the entire compensation of `3,26,340/-. thereafter, no action ..... the plan of the school building. . 7. thereafter, on 28.10.1994 (annexure p8, the foundation wrote to the district education officer that the 11th & 12th classes had been going on in the educational complex for the year 1993-94 and the construction of first phase of the educational complex was to completed by march, 1992 and ..... with a difference. a school where everyday is a joyful learning experience with high standards of teaching. the school is managed and established by the raunaq education foundation under the vision and inspiration of sh.o.s.kanwar a renowned industrialist and chairman and managing director of apollo tyres limited. sh.o.s.kanwar views .....

Gurnaib Singh Brar and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... with a legitimate expectation that his interest would be taken care of in evening of his life and thus this legitimate benefit emanating from legitimate expectation laid on a foundation of statute cannot be taken away from an employee, more particularly when the benefit has been made available and it created a vested right in the employees favour ..... claim of the bank on the ground that they had not submitted trust deed to the competent authority under the provident fund act. this led to the filing of civil writ petition no.4896 of 1993 by the bank who questioned the order of regional provident fund commissioner. this court during the subsistence of the proceedings stayed the ..... employees and the bank were both transferred to the pension fund so as to make it functionally viable. a trust was created vide trust deed dated 24.03.1993 for management and effective implementation of the scheme. it is not in dispute that all the employees of the bank continued to derive the benefit of the pension .....