Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: juvenile justice act 1986 repealed repealing act 1 juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 Page 1 of about 1,217 results (0.391 seconds)

Arnit Das Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC3575; 2001(49)BLJR2101; 2001CriLJ4238; JT2001(7)SC157; 2001(5)SCALE500; (2001)7SCC657

..... we, however, clarify that since learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner had reserved his argument on the applicability of juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, which repealed the 1986 act, for raising it in the trial court when the order of reference was made, we are not expressing any opinion on the question whether the juvenile justice (care and protection of children), 2000 applies to the fact and circumstances of the instant case or not.9. ..... in an inquiry conducted under section 32 of the juvenile justice act, 1986, (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1986 act') the trial court recorded a finding to the effect that petitioner arnit das was not a juvenile on the date of occurrence. ..... thus, this court also affirmed the concurrent findings regarding the age of the petitioner and that and that on the date of the offence, the petitioner was not a juvenile within the meaning of the provision of the 1986 act.3. ..... when the review petition came up for consideration on 19.1.2000, the division bench noticed that there appeared to be an apparent conflict of opinion on the question as to whether the date of commission of offence or the date on which the accused first appears in inquiry proceedings is relevant for the purpose of determining whether or not an accused was a juvenile under the 1986 act. .....

Maria Chaya Schupp, a German National Represented by Her Constituted A ...

Court : Karnataka

..... and further the juvenile justice act, 1986 was repealed and in its place, juvenil justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 was passed.hence insofar as the present petition is concerned, the petitioner having been taken in adoption in the year 1981, was at a time when there were no normative guidelines prescribing the procedure for adoption by foreign ..... 5 had produced copies of certain records, namely,a) an extract of the case history register of creche for the period 1.4.1986 to 23.1.1995b) a register of baptismsc) the admission book of women from 14.1.1983d) medical records of some children from 1989.the petitioner had thereupon sought for direction to respondents 1 and 2 to carry out a search of the premises of respondent no. ..... laid down procedural safe-guards in a foreigner proposing to take a child in adoption.in accordance with the directions of the apex, court the government of india, ministry of social welfare set up on 3.7.1990, the central adoption research agency to act as a clearing house of information in regard to placing children for in-country and inter-country adoption. ..... there was no statutory enactment providing for adoption of indian children by foreign parents, except the provisions of the guardians and wards act, 1890. ..... 5 has acted in violation of the same and hence requires to be brought to book.it is in respect of the vile practices, involving children, indulged in by institutions such as respondent no. .....

Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3801

..... counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the juvenile justice act, 1986 has already been repealed by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, whereby and whereunder, it has specifically been provided under section 4 of the said act that if there will be a conflict in respect of juvenile, the board shall enquire into the matter and submit a report as to whether the person is juvenile or not but the court below committed error in rejecting the prayer of the petitioner and held that the learned additional chief judicial magistrate is empowered ..... 3 and 4 as to whether they are juvenile or not only in accordance with the provisions of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and to direct the juvenile justice board (hereinafter referred to as 'the board') to hold enquiry as provided under the said act.2. ..... it is also pointed out that no notification has been made by the state government for constituting juvenile justice board as yet as required under section 4 of the said act and, therefore, the additional chief judicial magistrate is competent to hold enquiry for determination of age.5. .....

Chander Kumar Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... in the meanwhile, juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 was enacted and the earlier enactment juvenile justice act, 1986 stands repealed. ..... the effect of the repeal and enactment of juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 and amendments was examined by the supreme court in hari ram v. ..... in view of the aforesaid legal position, the appeal has to be allowed on the ground that the appellant was a juvenile as defined in section 2(k) of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, as he was below the age of 18 years at the time of commission of offence. ..... however, inasmuch as, the appellant was found to have completed the age of 16 years and 13 days on the date of alleged occurrence, the high court was of the view that the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 1986, would not apply to the appellant's case. ..... having regard to the views expressed hereinabove, we are unable to sustain the impugned order of the high court in holding that the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 1986, would not be applicable to the appellant's case since he was allegedly 13 days above the age prescribed.69. ..... initially proceedings against the appellant were initiated under the juvenile justice act, 1986. ..... the instant case is covered by the amended provisions of section 2(k), 2(l), 7a and 20 of the juvenile justice act, 2000. .....

Chhatravas, Chandra Arya Vidya Mandir Vs. the Director, Deptt of Women ...

Court : Delhi

..... sometimes the stand taken is that with the promulgation of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, the women and children institutions licensing act, 1956 has been repealed and thus it is pleaded that the petitioner would not be entitled to a renewal of the license granted to it under said act for running a home for orphans or parents who cannot support their children and that the petitioner should obtain a permission under the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000. ..... the jj act, 2000 replaced the jj act, 1986 and we have in the act, as per section 2(d), the definition of a child in need of care and protection. ..... the juvenile justice act, 1986 5. ..... since the jj act, 1986 contained provisions relating to juveniles, both delinquent as also neglected; a neglected juvenile being amongst others one without a home or means of subsistence and is destitute as also having a parent or a guardian who was unfit or incapacitated to exercise control over the juvenile, the repeal under the jj act, 1986, vide section 63 thereof of any law corresponding to said act, would repeal the children act, 1960 but that would not mean that the licensing act, 1956 would revive qua neglected and destitute children.31. .....

Jayavel Vs. State

Court : Chennai

..... it is to be noted that the old j.j.act 1986 has gone, repealed, in its place, new j.j.act, namely, juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act,2000 came in with effect from 1.4.2001. ..... we have anxiously considered the submissions made by both sides, perused petitioner's affidavit and the report of the inquiring judge, the several provisions of juvenile justice act, 1986 (shortly, hereinafter, old j.j.act, 1986) and the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (shortly, hereinafter, the new j.j.act, 2000) as amended by act no.33 of 2006 and several decisions on juvenile justice legislation.14. ..... state of west bengal [2012(10 scc 489.a three-judge bench of the hon'ble supreme court while referring to the object behind the new j.j.act, 2000 observed as under: " the 1986 act was replaced by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (for short " the 2000 act"). ..... court while confirming the conviction of the appellant by the trial court under section 302 r/w 34 i.p.c, since the appellant was a juvenile in conflict with law within the meaning of new juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 on the date when the offence was committed, he was already in jail for 9 years and attained his majority long back directed his release from jail and also noticing section 19 of the j.j act 2000 held that he shall not incur any disqualification because of its order.81. .....

Mohd Rashid Vs. State of JandK

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... the government of india in order to fulfil the standards of the uncrc, repealed the act of 1986 by enacting the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (for short the central act of 2000) providing for a special approach towards the prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency and a framework for the protection, treatment and rehabilitation of children in the purview of the juvenile justice system. ..... in the state of jammu and kashmir the act of the 1997 was repealed by the jammu and kashmir juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2013 (for short, the act of 2013). ..... sections 8 and 21 of the act of 2013 and rules 74 and 75 of the jammu and kashmir juvenile justice (care and protection children) rules, 2014 (for short rules of 2014) framed under the said act are relevant. ..... the government of india enacted the juvenile justice act, 1986 (for short the central act of 1986), to provide for care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles and for adjudication of matters relating to and disposition of the delinquent juveniles. ..... it is contended that date of birth of the appellant is 15.01.1991, his age as at the time of alleged occurrence, that is, 28.08.2005 was just over 14, he was a juvenile and entitled to benefit of juvenility under the jammu and kashmir juvenile justice act, 1997 (for short, the act of 1997) and the rules framed thereunder. .....

Deva Nand Singh Son of Prem Prasad Singh, Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... the 1986 juvenile act was replaced by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 which similarly provides the saving of all acts done under the previous law which was in operation at the time when the proceeding was initiated or pending. ..... the argument is that since the appellants were juveniles (child) and in conflict with the law, they were protected by the acts aforesaid and ought to have been tried under the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000. ..... the juvenile justice act, 1986. ..... it is further submitted that the appellants were juvenile and are entitled to protection of the bihar children act, 1960 and the subsequent amendment i.e. ..... section 63 of the juvenile justice act provides that any law in force in a state corresponding to this act shall stand repealed from the date on which the act come into effect, provided that the repeal shall not effect the previous operation of any law so repealed or anything duly done or suffered thereunder. ..... section 60 of the bihar children act, 1982 saved any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under any previous law corresponding to provisions of the act which stand repealed by the successor act i.e. ..... it also provides any right, privilege, obligation or liability required, accrued or incurred under the law so repealed shall be saved. .....

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 1986 act was subsequently repealed by juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000. ..... the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules 2007 (hereinafter referred to as 2000 rules ) were brought into force on 26th ..... dealing with this contention, it would be appropriate to first deal with the law on the subject: juvenile justice (care & protection of children) act, 2000 preamble: an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to juveniles in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection, by providing for proper care, protection and treatment by catering to their need, and by adopting a child friendly approach in the adjudication and disposition of matters in the best interest of children and for their ultimate rehabilitation . ..... is contended on behalf of the appellant that he was 17 years and 3 months old on the date of commission of offence and his case ought to have been dealt under the juvenile justice (care & protection of children) act, 2000 (in short j.act ) and the provisions of tada are inapplicable to his case and the learned designated court erred in negating the said contention. ..... the juvenile justice act 1986 was enacted in pursuance of the constitutional obligations cast under article 39 clause (f) of the constitution of india as well as of commitment to the aforesaid ..... the rules guide the states to protect children s rights and respect their needs during the development of separate and particular system of juvenile justice. .....

Vikram Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC92; 2009(6)SCALE726

..... the 1986 act was subsequently repealed by juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as '2000 act'). ..... the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules 2007 (hereinafter referred to as '2007 rules') were brought into force on 26th october 2007.6. ..... at the time of conviction the juvenile justice act, 1936 (hereinafter referred to as '1986 act') was in operation.5. ..... on 22.3.2006 section 2(1) of the act was amended stating that 'juvenile in conflict with law' means juvenile who is alleged to have committed an offence and has not completed 18 years of age as on the date of commission of such offence. ..... as per rule 97(2) all the cases pending which have not received a finality will be dealt with and disposed of in terms of the provisions of the 2000 act as amended on 22/8/2006 and 2007 rules. ..... we are of the view that the appellant is entitled to the benefit under the provisions of 2000 act as amended from 22.8.2006, and 2007 rules. ..... according to the appellant, he was a juvenile when the occurrence took place on 20/2/1996. ..... relying on the certificate issued by the central board of secondary education it is contended that the appellant was born on 4.5.1980 and on the date of incident he was below 16 years of age. ..... but considering the long passage of time and period of custody, we have passed the present order.8. ..... on 5/6/1998, the appellant was convicted for life imprisonment and other terms between 7 and 10 years.4. .....