Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute manufacturers cess act 1983 section 4 crediting proceeds of duties to the consolidated fund of india Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 64 results (0.204 seconds)

Delta Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1993LC599(Calcutta),1991(55)ELT510(Cal)

..... and state government departments and other organisations in all matters relating to the said unit.2. in 1983 jute manufactures cess act, 1983 (hereinafter described as the jute act) was passed to provide for levy and collection by way of cess, of a duty of excise on jute manufactures. the jute act came into force with effect from may 1,1984.3. the first contention of the writ petitioners is that ..... ) maintenance and improvement of existing markets and development of new markets outside india for jute manufactures and devising marketing strategy in consonance with the demand for such manufactures outside india;(h) ensuring stabilisation of price of jute manufacturers in and outside india.'8. the question that arises for consideration is whether the jute manufactures cess act, 1983 seeks to employ only an additional duty of excise and whether the .....

The Calcutta Jute Manufacturing Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jute Manufac ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1998(59)ECC92

..... been artificially treated as 'twine' in the central excise tariff.12. the jute manufactures cess act, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as the 1983 act) provides for levy of cess, the proceeds whereof are credited to the consolidated fund of india and a portion thereof may be paid to jute manufacturers development council in terms of jute manufacturers development council act, 1983. as noticed hereinbefore under section 3(4) of the 1983 ..... questions are adverted to, the basic fact which is not disputed may be noticed. the central government took steps to levy cess on jute manufactures under the provision of jute manufactures cess act, 1983 in terms whereof duty of excise is levied on certain items including hessian (which the petitioners manufacture) as referred to in the schedule appended thereto. sub-section (4) of section 3 of the said .....

Arthur Vs. Cumming

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that congress intended that they should be so understood. 3. while the act of june 6, 1872, 17 stat. 232, provides that an import duty of thirty percent ad valorem shall be levied "on all burlaps and like manufactures of flax, jute, or hemp, or of which flax, jute, or hemp shall be the component material of chief value, except such ..... , 9 wheat. 230; elliot v. swartout, 10 pet. 151; curtis v. martin, 3 how. 106. the statute here in question declares that "on all burlaps and like manufactures of flax, jute, or hemp, . . . except such as may be suitable for bagging for cotton, a duty of thirty percentum ad valorem shall be paid." the mercantile testimony in the record ..... shows that the articles in question were "burlaps," that they were a "manufacture of jute," and that they were not suitable for bagging for cotton. the exception may therefore be laid out of view. page 91 u. s. 364 the language of the .....

Arthur Vs. Homer

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ducks, canvas, paddings, cotbottoms, burlaps, drills, coatings, brown hollands, blay linens, damasks, diapers, crash, huckabacks, handkerchiefs, lawns, or other manufactures of flax, jute, or hemp, or of which flax, jute, or hemp shall be the component material of chief value, being of the value of thirty cents and under per square yard, twenty-five percent ..... italics, and the rate of the duty provided, they are nearly the same, word for word. in the paragraphs following they differ. the act of 1861 contains the provision that "manufactures of cotton, linen, silk, wool, or worsted, if embroidered or tamboured, in the loom or otherwise, by machinery or with the needle, ..... the seventh section of the act of june 30, 1864, 13 stat. 209, imposes duties as follows: "on brown and bleached linens, ducks, canvas, paddings, cotton bottoms, burlaps, diapers, crash, huckabacks, handkerchiefs, lawns, page 96 u. s. 139 or other manufactures of flax, jute, or hemp, or of which flax, jute, or hemp shall be .....

Greenleaf Vs. Goodrich

Court : US Supreme Court

..... not otherwise provided for, five percent ad valorem. " a subsequent section of the act imposed an additional duty of five percent ad valorem also on manufactures, not otherwise provided for, composed of mixed materials, in part of cotton, silk, wool or worsted, hemp, jute, or flax. an examination of these provisions will reveal very plainly that the classification ..... of the articles made subject to an increased page 101 u. s. 280 duty is not the same as it was in the act ..... percent duty. the circuit court had been requested to instruct the jury that if they should find that at the date of the act the shawls in question were commercially known as manufactures of worsted, or of which worsted was a component material, and that they were not known in trade as clothing ready made, .....

Robertson Vs. Glendenning

Court : US Supreme Court

..... or provided for in this act, thirty-five percentum ad valorem. " the defendants in error paid this duty under protest, claiming page 132 ..... j of 2502, tit. 33, rev.stat., as enacted by 6 of the act of march 3, 1883, 22 stat. 489, 507, which reads: "brown and bleached linens, ducks, canvas, paddings, cot bottoms, diapers, crash, huckabacks, handkerchiefs, lawns, or other manufactures of flax, jute, or hemp, or of which flax, jute, or hemp shall be the component material of chief value, not specially enumerated .....

Stockmeyer Vs. Tobin

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that ought to affect the sale; that the plantation, mules, machinery, and implements thereon constituted an estate complete for the purpose of cultivating sugar cane and manufacturing its products, and it was more valuable as a whole than it would have been if sold separately in the manner set forth in the protest; that ..... on account of insanity unless judgment of interdiction be pronounced before bringing suit, etc. . . ." "(5) that if the party die within thirty days after making the act or contract, the insanity may be shown by evidence without having applied for the interdiction; but if more than that time elapse, the insanity cannot be shown to invalidate the ..... upon which the above relief is sought will appear from the following summary of the pleadings and evidence: on the 7th of february, 1881, by public act before a notary, the defendants laura godberry and noelie godberry pledged to stockmeyer, his heirs and assigns, two promissory notes made by henry godberry and george godberry .....

Heinze Vs. Arthur's Executors

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for," and on "clothing, ready made, and wearing apparel of every description, of whatever material composed, except wool, made up or manufactured wholly or in part by the tailor, seamstress, or manufacturer." by 13 of the act of july 14, 1862, c. 163, 12 stat. 555, 556, an additional duty of 5 percent ad valorem was imposed on ..... description, of whatever material composed, except wool, made up or manufactured wholly or in party by the tailor, seamstress, or manufacturer;" and also (page 557) upon "manufactures not otherwise provided for, composed of mixed materials, in part of cotton, silk, wool or worsted, hemp, jute, or flax." by 6 of the act of june 30, 1864, c. 171, 13 stat. 208 ..... , 209, a duty of 35 percent ad valorem was imposed "on cotton shirts and drawers, woven or made on frames, and on all cotton hosiery," and "on cotton braids, insertings, lace, trimming, or bobinet, and all other manufactures of cotton .....

illinois Central R. Co. Vs. Decatur

Court : US Supreme Court

..... "all public taxes, rates, and assessments," and it was held not to discharge from liability for a paving assessment. a like rule was held in paterson v. society for manufactures, 24 n.j.law 385, where the exemption was from "taxes, charges, and impositions." and in bridgeport v. new york & new haven railroad, 36 conn. 255, ..... in page 147 u. s. 204 neustadt v. illinois central railroad, 31 ill. 484 -- and properly so in view of the provision in section 27 that the act "shall be favorably construed for all purposes therein expressed and declared" -- that the charter exemption extends to all general municipal taxation. but can any intent be derived from ..... assessments imposed to pay the cost of local improvements and charged upon contiguous property upon the theory that it is benefited thereby. on february 10, 1851, an act was passed by the general assembly of illinois incorporating the illinois central railroad company. by it the company was made the beneficiary of the land grant from congress .....

Seeberger Vs. Schlesinger

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , not specially enumerated or provided for. the case was held to be determined by rev.stat. section 2499, as amended by the act of march 3, 1883, that "on all articles manufactured from two or more materials the duty shall be assessed at the highest rates of which the component material of chief value may be ..... other kinds, and skins dressed and finished of all kinds, not otherwise provided for: twenty percentum ad valorem; skins for morocco, tanned, but unfinished: ten percentum ad valorem; manufactures and articles of leather, or of which leather shall be a component part, not otherwise provided for, thirty-five percentum ad valorem. " "leather and skins japanned, patent, ..... animals, with fabrics made of such hair or mixtures of the same with wool. the schedule then imposes a duty of six cents per yard upon "hemp or jute carpeting," and then provides that "carpets and carpetings of wool, flax, or cotton, or parts of either or other material, not otherwise herein specified, forty percentum .....