Jute Companies Nationalisation Act 1980 Section 13 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 section 13 Page 1 of about 327 results (3.194 seconds)National Jute Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. Vs. Kotihar Mazdoor Sangh ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2001SC1746; 2001(49)BLJR1173; [2001(89)FLR1038]; JT2001(5)SC59; 2001LabIC1734; (2001)IILLJ264SC; 2001(3)SCALE356; (2001)4SCC408; [2001]2SCR1177; 2001(2)SCT735(SC)
..... no order as to costs labour and industrial award section 12 of jute companies nationalisation act 1980 and section 13 of bihar industrial establishment national and festival holidays and casual ..... leave act 1976 appeal by management challenging validity and correctness .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Jute Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Office ...
Court : Kolkata
Reported in : [1982]49STC271(Cal)
..... act called the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 no 62 of 1980 hereinafter referred to as the act the undertakings of jute companies whose names appear in the first schedule to the act were nationalised it appears that by virtue of section ..... domain appears to be totally foreign to the concept of transfer generally 13 mr soumen bose appearing on behalf of the petitioner drew my attention .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Jute Manufactures Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Central
Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal
Reported in : (1994)95STC499Tribunal
the impression that the registration certificates of the erstwhile union jute company would be endorsed in its favour is totally incorrect subhas road calcutta pursuant to the enactment of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the 1980 act for short on and be in force in its name from the date of nationalisation and that njmc shall be deemed to be substituted in deemed to cover a certificate of registration under the 54 act held by the union jute company njmc who are accordingly of declaration forms etc for the period between december 22 1980 the date of first sale and commencement of liability to further it has been contended that a combined reading of section 5 of the 54 act and rules 5 6 7
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Bank of India Vs. Rai Bahadur Hurdutray Motilal Jute Mills Pri ...
Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1994)1CALLT448(HC)
manufacturers corporation who took over all the assets of the jute mill company or from any other funds or assets of is an appeal under section 20 7 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the appellant central bank of india filed an appeal under section 20 7 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the appellant central bank of india filed a appeal under section 20 7 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the appellant central bank of india filed a claim under section 20 7 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the appellant central bank of india filed a claim before baboo lall jain j 1 this is an appeal under section 20 7 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDipak Kumar Chatterjee Vs. Commissioner of Payments (Jute) and Another
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1993SC1264; JT1993(1)SC58; 1993(1)SCALE16; (1993)1SCC434
free hand to the commissioner under section 17 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the act to deal with the hand to the commissioner under section 17 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the act to deal with the claim to the commissioner under section 17 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the act to deal with the claim of of the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of the act 3 the appeal stands allowed accordingly with no order as commissioner under section 17 of the jute companies nationalisation act 1980 the act to deal with the claim of the appellant the appellant only in the light of the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of the act 3 the appeal stands
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindustrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the Cannanore Spinnin ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2002SC1841; 2002(3)ALD113(SC); 2002(2)ARBLR676(SC); II(2002)BC430(SC); [2002]110CompCas685(SC); (2002)4CompLJ337(SC); JT2002(4)SC318; (2002)3MLJ144(SC); 2002(3)SCALE574;
..... the facts briefly the nationalisation act came into force in the year 1974 by reason of which the assets of a debtor company stand vested on the state in terms of the provisions of the nationalisation act there was appointed a ..... section 29 of the act the suit of the appellant was not maintainable it may be noticed here that ..... jute mills v khyaliram 1968 1scr821 seems to have settled the law on the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadanlal Patodia and ors. Vs. Luxminarayan Cotton Mills Ltd. and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Reported in : [1978]48CompCas747(Cal)
regarding the power of court under section 38 of the companies act 1956 which corresponds to section 155 of the companies the objection that in view of the sick textile undertakings nationalisation act 1974 the petitioners have no locus standi and the act 1956 which corresponds to section 155 of the companies act 1956 as follows it is now well settled that although petitioners are entitled to an order as asked for under section 155 of the companies act 1956 it is now well 23rd of august 1969 thereafter the petitioners addressed letters dated 13th october 1970 requesting the respondent company to transfer the said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Hyderabad and anr ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1965SC1303
up by ramakotaiah must now be mentioned the schemes of nationalisation were published on the 26th may 1960 and notices in transport services from private operators under chapter iva of the act objections were then called for from persons affected by the costs one set of hearing fee indian evidence act 1872 section 3 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj murder case cannot be overlooked in dealing with cases of this kind 13 on the probabilities it may also be said in favour
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (2004)88TTJ(NULL)1045
..... section 1 of section 9 of the metal corporation nationalisation and miscellaneous provisions ordinance 1976 no 12 of 1976 the central government being satisfied that hindustan zinc ltd a government company ..... case of empire jute co ltd v cit 1980 124itr1 sc from ..... khatri a m income tax act 1961 section 37 1 in favour of ..... interest thereon was irrecoverable 13 the learned departmental representative relied .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSoorajmull Nagarmull Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax.
Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1991)99CTR(Cal)170
specifically has said that the records of m s chandpur jute co the alleged money lander reveal that the claim of of the assessee it was argued that because of the nationalisation of the coal mines the debts had become bad the claims mentioned in s 21 of the coal mines nationalisation act the assessee thus claimed the said debt a bad debt court and the judgment of supreme court was rendered in 1980 that is to say long after the instant assessment year 721 50 000total4 13 115the said amount of rs 4 13 115 was taxed in the aforesaid three assessment years thereafter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT