Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 preamble 1 jute companies nationalisation act 1980 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 1,793 results (0.218 seconds)

May 24 2010 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... , promote and ensure orderly growth of the insurance industry and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto and further to amend the insurance act, 1938, the life insurance corporation act, 1956 and the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972.'28. the statement of objects and reasons ('sor') indicates that a need was felt for the insurance industry, which was ..... for filing an appeal before the irda by the insured in case its claim is repudiated. it has to only file a suit for damages against the insurance company. it is next submitted that under section 64um(4) on receiving a report as directed by it under section 64um(3), the irda can issue directions ..... section 64um(2), (3) & (4) of the insurance act indicates the wide powers of the irda to deal with such claims of the insurers. further, the appellate authority?s power is co-terminus with the power of the irda. reliance is placed on the judgment in jute corporation of india ltd. v. commissioner of tax : jt 1990 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2024 (SC)

Opg Power Generation Private Limited Vs. Enexio Power Cooling Solution ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... exercisable civil appeal @ slp (c) nos.21017-21018 of 2021 page 20 of 150 under section 37 read with section 34 of the 1996 act. in this regard, reliance was placed on: (i) uhl power company limited v. state of himachal pradesh9; (ii) dyna technologies pvt. ltd. v. crompton greaves lt.,10; (iii) heidelbergh cement india ..... and the other arose subsequently, post commissioning/ completion of the project, on account of alleged defect in the material supplied. (viii) gita power being the holding company of opg and having actively participated in the formation of the contract as also in issuance of purchase orders for the supply/ works, which carried the arbitration clause ..... , a court or arbitral tribunal is empowered to determine whether a non-signatory is a party to an arbitration agreement. it was held that group of companies doctrine is premised on ascertaining the intention of the non- signatory to be party to an arbitration agreement. the doctrine requires the intention to be gathered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2024 (SC)

M/s. Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigatio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of allocation of coal blocks for captive use under section 3(3) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 is not to enable free trading of coal by private companies. the basic concept of captive mining permitted under the aforesaid act is that the coal obtained from a captive block shall be used entirely and exclusively for the ..... - in exercise of the powers conferred by item(4) of subclause (ill) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (26 of 1973) the central government hereby specifies as an end use the supply of coal from the coal mines of kiloni, manoradeep and baranj i-iv blocks ..... range of 4200 to 4940 kcal/kg as per goi notification. xxxxx article2the company and its objectives1 the parties of this agreement shall form and incorporate the company as a public limited company under the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at bangalore.2. the company shall be named karnataka emta coal mines limited; or in case such name .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2024 (SC)

The State Of Punjab Vs. Davinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... basis amongst the scheduled castes, in such manner as may be prescribed. explanation.- for the purposes of this act, services under the state includes the services under- (i) the government (ii) he legislature of the state (iii) any local authority (iv) any corporation or company owned or controlled by the government; or (v) any other authority in respect of which the state ..... legislature has power to make laws 10 part a the batch of matters challenging the tamil nadu act was tagged with the batch of matters challenging the punjab act. iii. the judgment in chinnaiah 11. a three .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2024 (SC)

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... be invalid because it allowed the municipalities to tax lands covered by coal mines, which were the subject of legislation by parliament under the mmdr act and the coal mines (nationalisation) act 1973355. chief justice y v chandrachud, speaking for the majority, rejected the contention on the ground that the tax on lands and buildings ..... in matters of tax and economic regulations,348 provided the law is reasonable349 and avoids clear and hostile discrimination against particular persons or classes.350 345 east india tobacco company v. state of andhra pradesh, 1962 scc online sc145 hiralal rattanlal v. state of u p, (1973) 1 scc216[20].. 346 khyerbari tea co. ltd ..... the sub-soil minerals was to be inferred from the express words of the grants.310253. in 1813, the court of directors of the east india company prohibited the government from introducing permanent settlements any further and ordered introduction of the ryotwari system in all unsettled lands in the provinces.311 thereafter, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2024 (SC)

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Vs. Bimal Kumar Shah

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (2014) 6 scc564 this court held that the rules of natural justice have been ingrained in the scheme of section 5a of the land acquisition act, 1894. in competent authority v. barangore jute factory, (2005) 13 scc477 this court observed that in the process from the initial notification to the final declaration, objections play a vital road ..... the national highways act, 1956 is bad, the entire process which is followed in pursuance of it is vitiated. 20 (iii ..... (1973) 1 scc157 this court held that the notice under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 is mandatory and if no notice is published, the entire process of land acquisition is vitiated. in competent authority v. barangore jute factory, (2005) 13 scc477 this court held that if the initial notification under section 3a of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr Sharanya Mohan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... if there is a direct nexus between the restrictions, and the object of the act, then a strong presumption in favour of the constitutionality of the act will naturally arise. (iv) a five judge bench of the apex court in sanjeev coke manufacturing company v. bharat cooking co. ltd [(1983) 1 scc147 , at para 16 ..... to problems made manifest by experience. thomas m cooley, in his a treatise on the constitutional limitations (first edition 1868) indian reprint 2005, hindustan law book company, calcutta at page 168 stated: the rule of law upon this subject appears to be, that, except where the constitution has imposed limits upon the legislative ..... , dated:17. 07-2012. notification-01 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984 (karnataka act 37 of 1984), the government of karnataka hereby makes the following rules, further to amend the karnataka selection of candidates for admission to government seats in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr. Sharanya Mohan Vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Health And Family We ...

Court : Karnataka

..... if there is a direct nexus between the restrictions, and the object of the act, then a strong presumption in favour of the constitutionality of the act will naturally arise. (iv) a five judge bench of the apex court in sanjeev coke manufacturing company v. bharat cooking co. ltd [(1983) 1 scc147 , at para 16 ..... to problems made manifest by experience. thomas m cooley, in his a treatise on the constitutional limitations (first edition 1868) indian reprint 2005, hindustan law book company, calcutta at page 168 stated: the rule of law upon this subject appears to be, that, except where the constitution has imposed limits upon the legislative ..... , dated:17. 07-2012. notification-01 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984 (karnataka act 37 of 1984), the government of karnataka hereby makes the following rules, further to amend the karnataka selection of candidates for admission to government seats in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr Shivani Ramachandran Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... if there is a direct nexus between the restrictions, and the object of the act, then a strong presumption in favour of the constitutionality of the act will naturally arise. (iv) a five judge bench of the apex court in sanjeev coke manufacturing company v. bharat cooking co. ltd [(1983) 1 scc147 , at para 16 ..... to problems made manifest by experience. thomas m cooley, in his a treatise on the constitutional limitations (first edition 1868) indian reprint 2005, hindustan law book company, calcutta at page 168 stated: the rule of law upon this subject appears to be, that, except where the constitution has imposed limits upon the legislative ..... , dated:17. 07-2012. notification-01 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984 (karnataka act 37 of 1984), the government of karnataka hereby makes the following rules, further to amend the karnataka selection of candidates for admission to government seats in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Mr Tanay Appachu Shastry Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... if there is a direct nexus between the restrictions, and the object of the act, then a strong presumption in favour of the constitutionality of the act will naturally arise. (iv) a five judge bench of the apex court in sanjeev coke manufacturing company v. bharat cooking co. ltd [(1983) 1 scc147 , at para 16 ..... to problems made manifest by experience. thomas m cooley, in his a treatise on the constitutional limitations (first edition 1868) indian reprint 2005, hindustan law book company, calcutta at page 168 stated: the rule of law upon this subject appears to be, that, except where the constitution has imposed limits upon the legislative ..... , dated:17. 07-2012. notification-01 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984 (karnataka act 37 of 1984), the government of karnataka hereby makes the following rules, further to amend the karnataka selection of candidates for admission to government seats in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //