Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 preamble 1 jute companies nationalisation act 1980 Page 10 of about 1,772 results (0.201 seconds)

Sep 13 2010 (SC)

Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... notwithstanding the fact that the lease has already expired:provided further that where an area reserved under rule 58 or under section 17a of the act is proposed to be granted to a government company, no notification under clause (ii) shall be required to be issued: provided also that where an area held under a reconnaissance permit ..... to the state government for early disposal as per the provisions of mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the "mmdr act") and the rules framed thereunder. on 26/27.02.2002, the company got a letter from the state government that out of the area of 513.16 hectares applied for by it ..... on rule 35, pointed out that the recommendations made to justify preference taking into account past investments by steel companies cannot be sustained. in any event, according to them, in view of section 2 of the act, state legislature is denuded of its legislative power to make any law with respect to the regulation of mines and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1985 (SC)

Prakash Amichand Shah Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC468; 1985(2)SCALE1437; (1986)1SCC581; [1985]Supp3SCR1025

..... on by the very same judge while deciding the bank nationalistion case (supra). he may have arrived at an incorrect or contradictory conclusion in striking down the bank nationalisation act. the result achieved by him in the subsequent case may be wholly wrong but it cannot have any effect of the efficacy of the decision in shantilal mangaldas's ..... title and interest of the head lessee, i.e., nawab of belha spinning, weaving and . in an auction sale held in the course of liquidation proceedings of the said company. the appellant thus became the head lessee of the entire plot of land with the rights specified in the documents dated november 15, 1882, referred to above. surat parsi ..... the constitution of india.2. the land in question originally belonged to one ladli begum. she granted a lease in respect of the said land in favour of a company called nawab of belha spinning, weaving and . under a document dated november 15, 1882 for a period of 99 years with effect from november 1, 1881 with a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1991 (HC)

K.P. Puttaram Vs. Vijaya Bank Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3614; 1991(2)KarLJ280

..... it is the case of the plaintiff that during the pendency of the appeal, the first defendant-bank has been nationalised with effect from 15-4-1980 under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1980, consequently the officers and servants of the bank have become entitled to claim protection and benefit of article 311 ..... the plaint:'the plaintiff does not press the relief of reinstatement in view of the provisions of specific relief act.'3. to add as paragraph 14a to the plaint/appeal:'the vijaya bank ltd., was nationalised subsequently in the year 1980 and it is an authority as defined under article 12 of the constitution of ..... follows in the interest of justice and equity.1. amendment of the cause title: vijaya bank ltd., as vijaya bank (acquired under the banking companies acquisition and transfer of undertakings act), wholly owned and controlled by the government of india presently having its administrative office at trinity circle, m.g. road, bangalore. 2. to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1983 (HC)

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Thozhilalar Shemalana Padukappu Union Vs. Nation ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ140Mad

..... itself. there is no dispute before us that the mills has not come within the mischief of nationalization under the sick textile under takings (nationalisation) act 57 of 74. as taken note of by the allahabad high court in national textile corporation v. industrial tribunal (supra) till the industrial undertaking is ..... with them only. the bench also took note of the fact that neither the memorandum and articles of association of the mills, nor the provisions of the companies act stood abrogated altogether. finally, the bench held that the industry in respect of the two mills, on account of their management being taken over in accordance with ..... the central government. section 18e(2) specifies that subject to the exceptions, restrictions and limitations by the central government, as may be specified in the notification the companies act shall continue to apply also such undertakings. section 18e speaks about the power of the central government to cancel a notified order under s. 18a. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 1988 (HC)

J.K. Synthetics Vs. Municipal Council, Kota

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1989Raj51; 1988(2)WLN487

..... the amount of the octroi duty as claimed was not paid within fifteen days, the municipal council would have issued a notice of demand under section 149 of the act. if the plaintiff-company upon whom a notice of demand would have been served did not, within forty days from the service of the notice, pay the sum demanded or did not ..... articles of commerce quite distinct from the raw cashewnuts....there is a transformation of the goods. the raw cashews are consumed by the respondents in the sense that a jute mill consumes raw jute, or a textile mill consumes cotton and yarn.'similarly in m.s. anwarkhan mahboob co. v. state of bombay, air 1961 sc 213 (216, 217), k. c. das .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1996 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Motor Industries Co. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1996)136CTR(Kar)513; ILR1996KAR2837; [1997]223ITR112(KAR); [1997]223ITR112(Karn)

..... not amount to acquisition of a capital asset. seen from the point of view of the revenue, the answer given by their lordships in the supreme court in empire jute company's case (supra) ought to have gone in its favour, for, according to the revenue it could be said that the expenditure made by the assessee had acquired for ..... the same is laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business or profession and is not in the nature of a capital expenditure. the act does not define the expression 'capital expenditure'. as to what would distinguish a revenue expenditure from an expenditure of a capital nature has been the subject-matter of a ..... taken by mico who would have otherwise been faced with a protracted litigation and consequent disruption in the distribution of its products. gec, it was urged, had been acting in the northern territories for over 20 years and due to its dominant presence in the area, was in a position to seriously prejudice mico's business if its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1991 (HC)

B. Srinivasa Acharya Vs. District Judge

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1365

..... by the 2nd respondent by virtue of section 5(5) read with section 17 of the banking companies act. 1980 up to 17-1-1981 on which date hrc 406/1978 was withdrawn. the jural ..... enforced by or against the corresponding new bank. hrc 406/1978 pending adjudication on 15-4-1980 on which date corporation bank ltd., was nationalised should be taken as continued ..... been issued, the proceedings taken up for eviction under sections 4 and 5 of the pp act are vitiated. he would construct this argument stating that sub-section (5) of section 5 of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1980 provides that the suit, appeal or other proceedings may be continued, prosecuted and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1991 (HC)

international Airport Authority of India Vs. Municipal Corporation of ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1991Delhi302; 43(1991)DLT601a

..... the entity share capital was subscribed by the government of india, it did not mean that the company did not own the property in question. it was held that the company was a separate legal entity, and u/s. 5(1) of the coal mines nationalisation act, the right, title and interest in a national coal -mine vested, by directions of the central government ..... , in the company. it is for this reason that the land and building was not to be regarded as .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1997 (HC)

National Research Development Corporation Vs. Silicon Ceramics Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)369; AIR1998Delhi52; 1997(2)ARBLR173(Delhi); 1997(42)DRJ476

..... know-hows, expertise etc. developed by different central government laboratories, including central electronics engineering research institute (for short `ceeri'), pilani. the respondent is a company incorporated under the indian companies act and is manufacturing semi-conductor packages. the petitioner granted license to the respondent to use the process developed by ceeri for manufacture of 'to-5, ..... for want of jurisdiction, the defect cannot be cured by appearance of the parties before the arbitrator. the learned counsel relied upon the decisions of the supreme court in waiverly jute mills co. ltd. etc. v. raymon and co. (india) pvt. ltd. and another, : [1963]3scr209 ; the union of india v. shri om prakash, : [ ..... agreement is void ab initio. such a situation is covered by the decision of the supreme court in the case of waiverly jute mills co. ltd : [1963]3scr209 , wherein it was held that an arbitration agreement being the very foundation on which the jurisdiction of the arbitrator to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1989 (HC)

Y.V. Anjaneyulu Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1990)89CTR(AP)43; [1990]182ITR242(AP)

..... the original assessment, the income-tax officer adopted the sum assessable under the head 'dividends' as the gross amount of dividend, received by the assessee-company. the audit party, while going through the file, noticed that a part of the amount borrowed by the assessee went into investment in shares. when ..... the petitioner, accordingly, filed a return under protect and without prejudice to his contentions that the respondent assumed jurisdiction under section 147 of the act without the conditions for the assumption of such jurisdiction being satisfied. he also requested the respondent to communicate the reasons for reopening the assessment. but ..... court held (headnote) : 'whether the income-tax officer completed the original assessment by applying the provisions of sections 70 - 74 of the income-tax act, 1961, in a particular way and subsequently the revenue audit party expressed a contrary opinion regarding the interpretation of these provisions and the income-tax officer initiated .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //