Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Year: 1967 Page 59 of about 665 results (0.545 seconds)

Desai Navinkant Kesarlal and ors. Vs. Prabhat Kabhai and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1968)9GLR694

..... names of the tenants were entered as permanent tenants, application dated 30th july was made. nothing was done for years but then after a thorough inquiry on merits under the tenancy act, the aval karkun came to the conclusion that the tenants were not permanent tenants. no appeals were sled, no revision application was made to the ..... petitioners to have the dispute decided according to law and first directed that the inquiry be again made under section 6 of the bombay land tenures abolition laws amendment act of 1958. it appears that the said section and the other sections of that act were struck down by the supreme court as unconstitutional. so he substituted the ..... the record of rights was first promulgated in the inam village and even before the inam was abolished, the record of rights was prepared without holding any inquiry and without hearing the petitioners though in law it was necessary to give written notice to the petitioners before the entries were made in the record of rights .....

Sher Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1412; 1967CriLJ1213; [1967]2SCR727

..... of minutes. the five accused were tried for his murder but were acquitted. on appeal the three appellants were convicted and sentenced. 5. the learned sessions judge in a long judgment exhaustively discussed the evidence but lost himself in the details of family relationship and other irrelevant matters sedulously brought out in a desultory cross-examination ..... empowers the high court to reverse an acquittal. 7. in this case the high court reassessed the evidence and considered the grounds for its rejection by the sessions judge. mr. chari contended that the high court ignored several factors. his argument was that the high court ought to have seen that the medical evidence contradicted the ..... the main issue, namely, whether what the eye-witnesses said was credible, in an attempt to examine the interrelation of the witnesses. this is an inquiry of value up to a point but is not conclusive because there is no crime proved in small village communities where some kind of relationship cannot be .....

Beopri Mal Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi73

..... the learned counsel for the union of india and the collector of central excise and land customs is right in his contention that the learned single judge while pronouncing on the legality of the penalty imposed overlooked the fact that the charge against beopri ml was that he in collusion with the two railway ..... the material before him, the collector could have drawn the inference that the constables were attempting to export indian currency into pakistan, this is what the learned judge observed:'the question that really presented considerable difficult is whether the sale-proceeds were brought from jodhpur to barmer. they were recovered at barmer. the persons ..... the learned judge observed.' if smuggled gold was recovered the collector could have, under the law confiscated the same. there seems to be no reason why the money which represents the proceeds of their gold cannto be confiscated..'we think that this conclusion ignores the language of section 167(8) of the sea customs act. that .....

Mutharasu thevar Vs. Mayandi thevar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1968Mad333

..... in such cases. the power in that case was also on very similar lines with the power which is scrutinised by me. while reviewing such a document, the learned judges observe:'my view of the document is as follows: i think its primary object was to recover on behalf of the principal the fruits of his decree. it contained ..... has an interest in the exercise of it or has a special property in, or lieu for advances upon, the subject-matter thereof......' s. 202 of the indian contract act itself runs in these terms: 'where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence ..... the amount which you have hitherto spent for the said proceedings and for spending in future, we have executed this power. we have given you authority through this to act for us as plaintiff or defendant or petitioner or respondent, give and to conduct proceeding in civil, revenue and criminal courts. you will incur the expenses therefor and in .....

New Manek Chowk Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Munic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1801; (1968)0GLR390; [1967]2SCR679

..... according to the judgment of the bombay high court in balkrishna v. poona municipal corporation 65 b.l.r. 119 (by which the district judge would be bound) : '.... the words used in section 406(1) of the act,.... do not cover the vires of the tax or the legality of the tax which is sought to be levied.' 27. earlier, the learned ..... judges had pointed out after nothing sections 406 to 413 that : 'the decision of judge aforesaid upon any appeal against any such value or tax if no ..... or sale therein. it was contended by the appellant that the premises of a factory was not a 'local area' within the meaning of the said entry. the majority of judges in that case held the impugned legislation to be beyond the competence of the state legislature and observed : 'in considering the meaning of the words 'local area' in entry .....

Hindustan Metal Works and Others Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax U. P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1968]68ITR798(All)

..... prayer that the respondents should be prohibited from proceeding further with the hearing of the case under section 132(1b).the common constitutional question is that section 132 of the act is violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(f) of the constitution and is accordingly void and inoperative. the search and seizure made under section 132 is accordingly illegal. ..... april 14, 1965, the petitioner received a notice dated april 12, 1965, regarding determination of the estimated tax liability under section 132(1b) of the income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter called the act). april 17 was the date fixed for hearing. the notice was issued after the expiry of the statutory period prescribed by rule 112a of the income-tax rules ..... dwivedi j. - these petitions are connected together as they raise a common question of law. a learned single judge, before whom these petitions were listed for hearing, has referred them to a large bench for decision. they have been listed before us for hearing.in the petition no. .....

Farzand Vs. Mohan Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1968All67; (1970)ILLJ241All

..... high court. there is no suggestion anywhere in the judgment of the supreme court that if the governor consults the high court, a committee of the judges of the high court cannot lawfully act for the court. it does not advert to the rules of the court relating to the administrative business of the court. this decision, therefore, cannot ..... by the high court. matters like grant of leave to or transfer of individual officers will have to be considered by all the 39 judges. in the state of west bengal v. n. n. bagchi : (1968)illj270sc the supreme court has held that the word 'control' in article 235 includes disciplinary jurisdiction, and the high court alone can hold ..... rules might be made under article 234, and (b) that these rules required prior consultation of the authorities named before they are made.'33. in bagchi's case, : (1968)illj270sc also, the supreme court read article 234 in the same way. referring to articles 233 and 234, hidayatullah, j. observed at page 779 (of scr)=(at p. 450 .....

U.P. Govt. Through Secy. Home Dept., U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow V ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1968All20; 1968CriLJ7

..... upadhya, air 1961 sc 751 it was held:'para 486 is mandatory and if the investigation has not been held under chapter xiv of the criminal procedure code, the subsequent inquiry and the order of dismissal are illegal 'on behalf of the appellant, it has been contended that the term 'departmental action' occurring in paragraph 486 of the ..... . in this view, he refused to grant any relief to the plaintiff. being aggrieved with that order, the plaintiff went up in appeal. the learned civil judge disagreed with the findings of the munsif. he found that the departmental proceedings conducted against the plaintiff were in contravention of the mandatory provisions of paragraph 486 of the ..... directed.5. the only submission made on behalf of the appellant is, that there was no bar in conducting the departmental trial under section 7 of the police act, even before the acceptance of the final report, and the only essential was, that the punishment could be awarded after such acceptance.6. there appears to .....

Giles Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the girl and foster is open to the construction that these key witnesses deliberately concealed from the judge, jury, and defense counsel evidence of the girl's promiscuity. [ footnote 6 ] while, under the law of maryland, specific acts of misconduct are inadmissible to impeach a witness' credibility, rau v. state, 133 md. 613, ..... juvenile proceeding) or of the fact that montgomery county police officials knew of such evidence. if a new hearing is held in the state courts, an inquiry into these matters might be deemed appropriate. [ footnote 7 ] the record before us affirmatively demonstrates that both detective collins and mr. kardy, who supervised the ..... by the plurality is bottomed upon materials entirely outside the record before us, furnished to this court after the case was submitted, under the leverage of inquiries put from the bench during the argument. the materials are two pre-indictment police reports, the montgomery county officers' report and the supplementary offense report. .....

Chapman Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a california state criminal trial during which the prosecutor, as then permitted by a state constitutional provision, extensively commented on their failure to testify. the trial judge also charged the jury that it could draw adverse inferences from such failure. after the trial, but before petitioners' appeal was considered, the state constitutional ..... ] for myself, i intimate no view on congressional power with respect to state courts in this regard. [ footnote 3/2 ] cases in which lower federal courts, acting under the authority of the fourteenth amendment, as expanded by this court's decision in reynolds v. sims, 377 u. s. 533 , have promulgated their own reapportionment ..... done today, that a special harmless error rule is a necessary remedy for a particular kind of error revives the unfortunate idea that appellate courts must act on particular errors, rather than decide on reversal by an evaluation of the entire proceeding to determine whether the cause as a whole has been determined .....