Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Year: 1967 Page 44 of about 665 results (0.182 seconds)

income-tax Officer Vs. Adarsh Construction Company (Dissolved Firm).

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1968]70ITR796(All)

..... workable...'mr. gulati urged that, if the interpretation placed on section 22(4) by the learned single judge is accepted, the provisions would be unworkable. we may point out that section 22(4) is not the only provision in the act enabling the income-tax officer to examine the relevant documents. sub-section (3) of section 23 provides ..... under section 22(1) for purposes of action under section 22(4) of the act.the learned single judge was, therefore, right that, in the circumstances of the present case, no notice could be served upon the respondent under section 22(4) of the act. since the notice itself was invalid, no assessment could be done on the footing ..... that the respondent failed to comply with the notice issued under section 22(4). the learned single judge was justified in quashing the assessment order dated november 30, 1961.the appeal .....

Roop Lal Mehta Vs. Dhan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1968P& H1

..... that entry is an elector for that constituency, unless it was proved that he was subject to a disqualification mentioned in section 16 of the 1950 act. this argument was repelled by the learned judge on the basis of certain observations contained in paragraphs 12, 13 and 15 in brijendra-lal gupta v. jwalaprasad, air 1960 sc 1049. 15 ..... that the electoral rolls were not final and conclusive for the purpose of election petition was quashed by writ of certiorari. the learned judges considered the various relevant provisions of the u. p. town areas act, 1914, and other u. p. statutes and the rules made thereunder as well as the provisions of the representation of the people ..... j., with whom t. k. joseph j. agreed and the reasons succinctly stated in the judgment of the learned acting c. j., were elaborated in the judgment of the third learned judge c. a., vaidialingam j. (now a judge of the supreme court). the question for determination before the full bench also was whether in the case of a .....

Panchu Gopal Das Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1968Cal38,1968CriLJ40

..... by the learned defence counsel to some of the witnesses elicited answers which have the look of very prejudicial materials against the accused, including certain suggestions which the learned judge in his charge to the jurv thought ftt to characterise as 'vain suggestions' whichshould 'be treated with contempt' or 'too bold or fantastic'. these 'r' ..... lane, from this evidence without taking into consideration evidence about any statement made by the accused which could be admis-.ible under section 27 of the evidence act. it is quite safe and reasonable to hold, as the jury have found to arrive at their verdict that the knife belonged to the accused and after ..... has been complete disregard of the prohibition contained in sec. 162 cr.p.c, and also of the essential necessity of compliance with section 145 of the evidence act. by such lack of care some prejudicial matters have found its way in the record of evidence, though strictly they were inadmissible. the other characteristic pointed out .....

Ashok Ratti Lal Trivedi Vs. Anjani Madhusudan Oza

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT235

..... since at that tim the english courts had no power to order permanent alimony in nullity suits, the indian courts also under the indian divorce act had no power to do so. the learned judges of the bombay high court negatived the contention on the ground that section 7 authorised the courts to apply the law in england as in ..... filed by the respondent herein in january, 1965, the marriage was annulled uner section 12(1)(a) of the hindu marrriaga act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the act by a decree of mullity passed by learned additional district judge, delhi, on 26th april, 1966. on. 9th june, 1966, the respondent herin applied for an order for payment of ..... section 5(7)(c) will be taken away, and section 5(7)(c) will remain as attenuated and anaemic provision.'the learned judge there was considering section 5(7) of the madras hindu bigamy prevention and divorce act, 1949. this decision was referred to by the bench decision of the madras high court already referred to and the learned .....

Hari Raj Singh Vs. Sanchalak Panchayat Raj, U.P. Govt., Lucknow and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1968All246; (1968)ILLJ407All

..... year was out he again got into trouble and serious charges of misconduct were framed against him. he was suspended once again. as a result of the inquiry, he was removed from service by an order of the joint director, panchayat rai, dated the 12th may 1954. his appeal against this decision was dismissed by ..... of suits, appeals, and certain applications to courts, . ... '(the rest of the preamble is not relevantfor this case). section 3, which is the backbone of the act, provides.'3. subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 25 (inclusive) every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made after the period of limitation prescribed ..... it does, and rejects the claim as 'time-barred' it extends the law of limitation beyond its prescribed orbit and usurps the prerogative of the courts, and acts without jurisdiction. alternatively, its decision is based on an extraneous and irrelevant consideration not permitted by law and therefore illegal whichever way we look at it, the .....

In Re Gault

Court : US Supreme Court

..... not merely technical or historical, but, like the hearsay rule, have a sound basis in human experience, they should not be rejected in any judicial inquiry. juvenile court judges in los angeles, tucson, and wisconsin rapids, wisconsin report that they are satisfied with the operation of their courts despite application of unrelaxed rules of evidence ..... children's bureau pub. no. 437-1966, p. 47 (hereinafter cited as standards); new york family court act 721 (1963) (hereinafter cited as n.y.family court act). the court also held that the judge may consider hearsay if it is "of a kind on which reasonable men are accustomed to rely in serious affairs ..... 's protection, and not with his punishment. i do not question that the methods employed in such cases must be consistent with the constitutional obligation to act in accordance with due process, but certainly the fourteenth amendment does not demand that they be constricted by the procedural guarantees devised for ordinary criminal prosecutions. .....

Charandas Malhotra Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs and Superintende ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1968Cal28

..... that there might be any number of extensions provided that each extension was for a period of not more than an months in our opinion, the learned judge is not justified in construing onp statutory provision by a decision dealing with the interpretation of another statutory provision, the wordings of which are substantially different before ..... other documents in respect of 131 watches seized on the 19th march, 1963. it is stated that the vouchers related to 126 watches. on the 21st of june 1968 the rummaging inspector wrote to the appellant as follows:--'please refer to your letter dated 6th may, 1963 forwarding vouchers, bills, invoice, etc. relating to the seized ..... punjab : 1983(13)elt1365(sc) ayyanger j. was referring to the provision of section 1671811 ot the sea customs act. 1878 which provided for a penalty in respect of goods which were smuggled. the learned judge pointed out that two matters had to be established before a person is held guilty of the offence stated therein. firstly .....

Jagabandhu Behera Vs. Kshetrabasi Samal and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1968Ori26; 34(1968)CLT786; 1968CriLJ205

..... two cases, will not amount to conversion of the two cases from one class to another. it was argued that the maintainability of the complainant's appeal is to be judged on the footing as tohow the case was initially instituted against the accused-respondents; admittedly the case against accused nos. 1 to 10 in the g, r. case was initially ..... or tagging together of two criminal cases for joint trial of the accused persons, as in the present case. the supreme court decision was also considered by a learned single judge of this court in bankebehari modi v. ramawa-tar saha in cri revn. no. 488 of 1965 (unreported) d/- 2-9-1966 (ori) -- in which the peculiar facts of that .....

Municipal Board Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ1All

..... be paid his salary throughout. in para. 2, the order has stated that in view of the above legal opinion, the municipal board be instructed to act accordingly. in june 1968 the municipal beard made a representative, but the same was rejected by an order dated 13 october 1966.5. for that petitioner it has been urged that ..... and as such the state government had no jurisdiction to readjudicate that matter. i do not agree. the writ petition was not pressed at the final hearing. the learned judge specifically held that it is not necessary to discuss that petition on merits. in d(sic) state of uttar pradesh : [1962]1scr574 the supreme court held:if ..... not given any retrospective effect. hence they were not applicable in 1958 or in 1959. the abolition of the post therefore did not contravene any provision of the municipalities act or the rules.12. it was also urged that respondent 3 was a permanent employee holding the post substantively. he services, therefore, could not be terminated abruptly. .....

Muhammad Akhtar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ767All

..... of the bench. he held that article 310 was subject to the exception expressly provided in the constitution. it is not subject to the acts or the rules that may be framed under article 309. with respect, i am not in agreement with the observations of mishra, j. ..... case of barium chemicals, ltd. v. co. law board a.i.r, 1967 s.c. 295, under section 237(b) of the companies act, 1956, the central government could order an investigation if in its opinion the circum-stances set out in sub-clause (i), (ii) or (iii ..... the supreme court was followed in this court in kedar nath pandey v. state of uttar pradesh : (1968)iillj6all .4. for the petitioner reliance was placed upon a decision of the patna high court. tarak nath ghosh v. government of india ..... : (1968)illj376pat . there mishra, j., held that the pleasure of the president means that no employee can necessarily insist upon continuation .....