Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Year: 1960 Page 5 of about 434 results (0.315 seconds)

Nov 08 1960 (HC)

Motibhai Vithalbhai Patel and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-08-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Guj93; (1961)2GLR1

..... entitled to use the work must render the acquisition invalid and bad in law? 30. it has to be noticed that section 41 makes the government the sole judge of the manner in which the public are to have the use of the land which is being taken up for the company. the right of the public to ..... appropriate government is satisfied after considering the report, if any, of the collector under section 5a, subjection (2), or on the report of the officer making an inquiry under section 40 that the purpose of the proposed acquisition is to obtain land for the erection of dwelling houses for workmen employed by the company or for the provision ..... : for expansion of the sarabhai chemicals works (karamchand premchand private limited) at baroda. and whereas the government having caused inquiry made in conformity with the provisions of the said act and being satisfied as a result of such inquiry that the acquisition of the said land is needed for the said purposes i.e. for expanding the factory of sarabhai .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1960 (HC)

Moolchand and ors. Vs. Chhoga and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-07-1960

Reported in : AIR1963Raj25

..... nuisance within the meaning of section 91 read with clause 48 of section 3, of the general clauses act with respect to the infringement or injury to a village pathway seems to me, with utmost respect, for the eminent judges who have taken that view, to be not free from a certain amount of doubt or difficulty ..... plaintiffs are entitled to the reliefs prayed for, namely, demolition and perpetual injunction and cancellation of the patta granted by the thikana to the defendants. the learned judge of the court below having found that the plaintiffs had failed to establish their case in the first suit (a finding with which i have substantially disagreed) felt ..... a temporary injunction had been issued by the court against the original defendants in that case soon afterwards and yet construction had been raised on it. the learned judge found that this explanation was unsatisfactory because according to him the previous suit was based on easement by prescription, and that, in any case, if that suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1960 (HC)

Kunhipennu Vs. Special Tahsildar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-07-1960

Reported in : AIR1962Ker25

..... the amount awarded by the collector under section 11.2. when the applicant has refused to make such claim or has omitted without sufficient reason (to be allowed by the judge) to make such claim, the amount awarded by the court shall in no case exceed the amount awarded by the collector.3. when the applicant has omitted for a ..... of the court-fee due of her memorandum of appeal.2. the collector awarded a sum of rs. 5,523-7-4 and the statutory solatium thereon. the subordi-nate judge after discussing the facts and circumstances of the case said ;'i would, therefore, ind that the claimant has not established her right to any enhancement of the compensation awarded ..... the claim.3. the operative portion of the judgment is by no means artistic. but there is no doubt that what the judge intended to do was to pass an award under section 26 of the land acquisition act, 1894, for the same amount as was awarded by the collector.4. the appellant claims an enhancement of the compensation awarded by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1960 (HC)

Kochunni Kartha and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-07-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Ker210

..... about the customary kanam tenure in the malabar districts, were not unanimous. some of the reports of the collectors and other revenue officials, made as results of inquiries directed by the government from time to time for investigating into the nature of the tenures, thought it to be lease, while others found it to he ..... by the government to the high court for its opinion. sir charles turner the then chief justice, severely criticised the view of the committee, and the other judges of the high court agreed with him. the government appointed another committee, which was recommending a legislation for securing the tenants, on eviction, full value of the ..... s learned advocate, in support of the argument concerning section 9 of theproclamation and the regulations thereunder, being special provisions and not having been repealed by the act, has relied on the maxim generalia specialibus non derogant. the legal position is well summarised by maxwell on interpretation of statutes (10th edn., p. 177) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1960 (FN)

Michalic Vs. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-07-1960

..... was before a jury in the district court for the northern district of ohio. judgment was entered for the respondent on the unseaworthiness and jones act claims upon a verdict directed by the trial judge on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence. the court of appeals for the sixth circuit affirmed. 271 f.2d 194. we granted certiorari, ..... off." he protested to the pumpman that "this wrench keeps slipping off," and the pumpman answered "never mind about that, do the job as best you can." the trial judge found the evidence to be insufficient to present a jury question whether the wrench was a reasonably suitable appliance, because, "on the theory the grip is worn . . . , ..... with the confusing language of the complaint and whether it may be read as pleading a claim solely on the theory of negligence. [ footnote 2 ] the trial judge ordered the second mate's testimony to be stricken from the record when it appeared that the mate left the orion on december 19. the court of appeals nevertheless .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1960 (HC)

C. Achutha Menon Vs. Election Tribunal, Trichur

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-02-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Ker186

..... has the jurisdiction -- and we think that in doing so he has made a fair concession the order for recount should be passed not at the initial stages of the inquiry. the general practice, however, of directing such recount, is otherwise. in this connection, our attention has been drawn to the following passage in rogers on elections vol. ..... earlier, that has been allowed, as already stated, on september 19, 1960. that has resulted in the writ petition being filed in this court and the learned judge has declined to exercise his powers under article 226 at this stage.2. the appellant's learned counsel has taken us through the entire order, and has urged the ..... not only to invalidate the appellant's election under section 100, but to get himself declared as duly elected, under section 101, of the representation of the people act, 1951.that petition is being inquired into by the election tribunal, trichur, and the proceedings are still at the initial stages. earlier to the application, on which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 1960 (HC)

Narayana Ayyangar, Kasturi Ayyangar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Madra ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-01-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Mad258; (1961)1MLJ198

..... of the suit venkatarama iyengar died and narayana iyengar and ramaswami iyengar were impleaded as his legal representatives.4. the learned subordinate judge who tried the suit held that section 6 (13) of madras act xix of 1951 would cover the feeding charity and accordingly he dismissed the suit with costs of the first defendant. this appeal ..... whether this endowment constituted religious charity within the meaning ot section 6(13) of the act. anantanarayanan j. delivering the judgment of the bench observed thus at page 494:'it is not now necessary to consider whether the learned subordinate judge was justified in his finding that the puja and neivedhyam had to be performed at ..... . p. no. 297 of 1947 on the file of the district court of tiruchirapalli under section 84(1) of the act for the cancellation of the order levying contribution.by order dated 11-3-1947 the learned district judge allowed the petition holding that the charity was not a 'specific endowment' within the meaning of madras .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 1960 (HC)

Amir Chand Tota Ram, Delhi Vs. Smt. Sucheta Kripalani, Delhi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-01-1960

Reported in : AIR1961P& H383

..... . to what extent such relation may be sufficient to fix the candidate must, it seems to me, be a question of degree and of evidence to be judged of by the election petition tribunal.'both these cases were followed in mathai mathew manjuran v. k.c. abraham, 10 elr 376 (403). the question of agency ..... as 11 and 12 and are reproduced below :'11. whether the fact of asking manmohinisehgal to retire from the contest under section 55aof the r. p. act by shri jawahar lal nehru, primeminister of india when shrimati manmohini sehgalwas no longer a member o the congress partydoes not amount to a corrupt practice namely undueinfluence ..... raised is whether the election tribunal was justified in refusing permission to amend the particulars under section 90, subsection (5) of the representation of the people act, even though the allegation of corrupt practice finds place in the election petition and there is application seeking permission to amend particulars before the election tribunal.the division .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1960 (SC)

The District Board, Ghazipur Vs. Lakshmi NaraIn Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-1960

Reported in : AIR1961SC356; [1961]2SCR81

..... further licence-fee under section 91(q) of the district boards act read with section 174. as pointed out by the learned single judge, the fees levied under the control order of 1948 which depends for its existence ..... on the essential supplies act and under the u.p. pure food act are for different purposes of those acts. the fee charged by the district board is ..... the appeal court, though the learned single judge had dealt with it and held against the respondent. the contention is that certain fees are being levied on the respondent in respect of these mills under the u.p. rice and dal mills control order, 1948 and the u.p. pure food act and therefore the district board cannot levy any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1960 (HC)

P. Ramabhadra Raju Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-19-1960

Reported in : AIR1961AP355; [1962]45ITR118(AP)

..... does not present much difficulty. that the expression 'individuals' cannot merely mean individual human beings but is wide enough to comprehend indivi-duals forming a unit, is evident from the judg-ment of their lordships of the supreme court in commr. of income-tax, m. p. v. sodra dcvi, (s) : [1957]32itr615(sc) . bhagwati j., ..... index to the interpretation of item 86 in list i of the seventh schedule.22. for these reasons, we uphold the validity of section 3 of the act in its relation to hindu undivided families and the wealth tax officers are authorised to initiate proceedings in assessing the capital assets of hindu undivided families. no ..... thereupon, the assessee moved this court to remove those orders on certiorari.3. the principal contention urged on behalf of the petitioner is that section 3 of the act, which enables the revenue to tax a hindu undivided family, is beyond the legislative competence of the union parliament and, consequently, the proceedings started by the proper .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //