Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 1960 Page 4 of about 53 results (0.176 seconds)

Flemming Vs. Nestor

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the grounds specified in 202(n), his old-age benefits were terminated shortly thereafter. he commenced this action in a single-judge district court, under 205(g) of the social security act, to secure judicial review of that administrative decision. the district court held that 202(n) deprived appellee of an accrued property ..... trusted, and political liberty must be restrained." "james madison challenged this latter doctrine. the investigative power of congress over persons, he contended, was limited to inquiry into the conduct of individuals in the public service. 'opinions,' he said, 'are not the subjects of legislation.' start criticizing people for abuse of their ..... page 363 u. s. 637 is ground for the inference of a congressional concern with the administration of the social security program. only after this inquiry would i consider the application of the presumption. the court seems to acknowledge that the statute bears harshly upon the individual disqualified, but states that .....

Steelworkers Vs. Warrior and Gulf Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to submit. yet, to be consistent with congressional policy in favor of settlement of disputes by the parties through the machinery of arbitration, the judicial inquiry under 301 must be strictly confined to the question whether the reluctant party did agree to arbitrate the grievance or did agree to give the arbitrator ..... using the arbitration process is primarily to further their common goal of uninterrupted production under the agreement, to make the agreement serve their specialized needs. the ablest judge cannot be expected to bring the same experience and competence to bear upon the determination of a grievance, because he cannot be similarly informed. the congress, ..... however, has, by 301 of the labor management relations act, assigned the courts the duty of determining whether the reluctant party has breached his promise to arbitrate. for arbitration is a matter of contract, and a .....

Hoffman Vs. Blaski

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , the parties have in this court commendably narrowed their contentions to the scope of the only relevant inquiry. the points of contention may be sharpened by first observing what is not in contest. discretion of the district judges concerned is not involved. propriety of the remedy of mandamus is not assailed. no claim is made ..... 1400(b), which provides: "(b) any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business." see stonite products co. v. melvin lloyd co., 315 u. s. 561 ; fourco glass co. ..... of such a provision, see baltimore & ohio r. co. v. kepner, . . . 314 u. s. 44 , . . . which was prosecuted under the federal employer's liability act in new york, although the accident occurred and the employee resided in ohio. the new subsection requires the court to determine that the transfer is necessary for convenience of the .....

Parker Vs. Ellis

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the writ is no longer relevant, because the function of the writ -- to provide and to facilitate inquiry into the validity of the applicant's claim -- has already been fully served. [ footnote 8 ] the district judge page 362 u. s. 583 ordered that petitioner's application be heard upon affidavits, depositions, and the record ..... there is also some dispute among these authors with respect to the historical significance of the jenkes case. the nature of the abuses which led to passage of the act is clear, however, and, for present purposes, it is immaterial which particular case aroused the greatest public sentiment. [ footnote 14 ] under our habeas corpus statute ..... state's interest in upholding the validity of this conviction is insubstantial. [ footnote 30 ] for example, under 504 of the labor-management reporting and disclosure act of 1959, persons who have been convicted of specified crimes are ineligible to serve for a five-year period in various positions for labor unions or employer .....

State of U.P. Vs. Deoman Upadhyaya

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC1125; 1960CriLJ1504; [1961]1SCR14

..... of criminal procedure lays down that no statement made by any person to a police-officer in the course of an investigation shall be used for any purpose at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made. sub-s. (2) of s. 162 of the said code which ..... of the confession. this point, though it did not affect the prisoner at the bar, was stated to all the judges; and the line drawn was, that although confessions improperly obtained cannot be received in evidence, yet that the acts done afterwards may be given in evidence, though they were done in consequence of the confession.' 82. where, however, ..... indian evidence act. 33. a combined effect of the said provisions relevant to the present enquiry may be stated thus : (1) no confession made to a police-officer by an accused can be proved against him; (2) no statement made by any person to a police-officer during investigation can be used for any purpose at any inquiry or trial; .....

Vadilal Panchal Vs. Dattatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonker and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC1113; (1960)62BOMLR915; [1961]1SCR1

..... , for the purpose of ascertaining the truth or falsehood of the complaint : provided that ..................... (it is unnecessary to read the proviso). (2) if any inquiry or investigation under this section is made by a person not being a magistrate or a police-officer, such person shall exercise all the powers conferred by this ..... not produced, but that officer very improperly wrote a letter to the magistrate saying that he had given such an order. in these circumstances, the same learned judge who decided the earlier case observed : 'it was, therefore, incumbent on the magistrate to investigate the complaint and to find out whether the allegation of ..... to ascertain whether there is sufficient foundation for it to issue process against the person or persons complained against. in the present case the magistrate clearly acted in the exercise of these powers under s. 202, criminal procedure code. he allowed the complainant to produce such evidence in support of his complaint as he wished .....

Jai Kaur and ors. Vs. Sher Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC1118; [1960]3SCR975

..... a daughter does not succeed in the presence of collaterals. as regards the remainder of the suit land which he held was non-ancestral, the learned judge was of opinion that the gift was merely an acceleration of succession as under the customary law governing the parties daughters exclude collaterals as regards succession to ..... grewal jats of ludhiana the daughter excluded collaterals as regards non-ancestral property. he held, therefore, agreeing with the trial judge that as regards the non-ancestral property the deed of gift was merely an act of acceleration of succession and was, therefore, valid and binding. the appeal was accordingly dismissed and so also were ..... the cross-objections which appear not to have been pressed. 3. on second appeal the learned judges of the east punjab high court accepted the contention .....

Kavalappara Kottarathil Kochuni and ors. Vs. the State of Madras and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC1080; [1960]3SCR887

..... was void as abridging his fundamental rights under art. 19(1)(f) and art. 31. the court by a majority held that the act was void as it infringed art. 31 of the constitution. the majority of the judges, who constituted the bench, took the view that cls. (1) and (2) of art. 31 related to the same subject of ..... britain in spite of the supremacy of parliament. why should we assume or apprehend that our parliament or state legislatures should act like mad men and deprive us of our property without any rhyme or reason?" further, the learned judge was of the view that unless art. 3 l(l) was construed in the manner he did, it would not ..... or to have them registered as impartable. after some infructuous proceedings under the provisions of the said act, respondents 10 to 17, who then constituted the entire kavalappara tarwad, filed o.s. no. 46 of 1934 in the court of the subordinate judge of ottapalam for a declaration that all the properties under the management of the sthanee were tarwad .....

Luhar Amrit Lal Nagji Vs. Doshi Jayantilal Jethalal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC964; [1960]3SCR842

..... , that the purchasers at an execution sale, being strangers to the suit, if they have not notice that the debts were so contracted, are not bound to make inquiry beyond what appears on the face of the proceedings'. the first proposition which has been laid down in this judgment as deduced from kantoo lal's case (1874) l ..... by respondent 2. in the result the suit filed by the appellants was decreed. against the said decree respondent 1 preferred an appeal before the district judge, but the district judge agreed with all the findings made by the trial court and dismissed the said appeal. respondent 1 then took the matter before the high court of saurashtra ..... was right in giving the decree, or having given it, in putting up the property for sale under an execution upon it. evidence showed that the auction purchaser acted bona fide, had made enquiries and was satisfied that the decree had been properly passed and purchased the property at auction sale on payment of valuable consideration. on .....

A.S.T. Arunachalam Pillai Vs. Southern Roadways (Private) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC1191; [1960]3SCR764

..... so the government of madras could not make such an order in the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. the case will accordingly go back to the single judge for decision on the other points raised in the writ petition filed by the respondent. 20. the appellant is entitled to his costs of this appeal. ..... that the government of madras had equally no jurisdiction to grant the variation on a revision petition filed against the order of the regional transport officer. the learned judge accordingly set aside the order of the government of madras dated december 28, 1955, without going into the other contentions raised by the respondent in its petition ..... in the madras city should be the secretaries to the regional transport authorities and that an officer of the grade of a district judge should be appellate authority prescribed under s. 64(1) of the act, as amended, to deal with appeals against the orders of the regional transport authorities and be designated as the state transport appellate .....