Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Court: gujarat Page 9 of about 3,165 results (0.379 seconds)

BHAGiBEN CHAMNABHAi PARMAR - THRO' CHAMNABHAi D PARMAR. Vs. STATE OF G ...

Court : Gujarat

..... in a case, where request for termination of pregnancy is made on such grounds. of course, explanation-1 of sub-section(2) of section-3 of the said act provides for a presumption. nevertheless, such presumption can be rebutted and the certification of the doctor would depend upon a number of other factors, including the stage of pregnancy ..... 2010, for the alleged offences punishable under section-366 of the indian penal code and section-3(1)(x)of the schedule castes and schedule tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989.2.1 the complainant had alleged, inter alia, that his daughter aged about 18 years, was kidnapped by one amratji agraji thakore, the original accused. she ..... (hereinafter referred to as 'the said act') to contend that, when a woman becomes pregnant due to rape, it would be a ground for legally terminating the pregnancy. he relied on a decision of the learned single judge of the madras high court, in the case of "d. rajeswari v. state of tamil nadu and others", reported in .....

Jandawala Chunilal Ranchhoddas and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

..... of this court;h. surrender their passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;7. if breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned sessions judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.8. bail before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. the bail application qua the ..... judge;g. furnish the address of their residence to the io and also to the court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without ..... ;b. not to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;c. maintain law and order and should co-operate the investigating officers;d. not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;e. not leave the local limits of state of gujarat without the prior permission of the concerned sessions .....

Anas Abdul Rashid MachiswalA. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

..... 6/03 was conducted by acp singhal, wherein, statement of mustak chandmiya was recorded. copy of the statement was given to this witness and he also made inquiry with regard to amts tiffin bomb blasts and gathered information through the statement of mustak chandmiya. he also recorded statement of mohd. samir siddiqbhai shaikh. thus, ..... explosive capacity around the time of preparing bombs in pursuance of the criminal conspiracy which was hatched by the accused. learned special judge, placing reliance on sec.10 of the evidence act held that reasonable ground existed to hold that prima facie evidence ensures this accused and others to have conspired to commit illegality and ..... 5.5 thus, considering the depositions adduced by these witnesses, it becomes clear that witness arifkhan has deposed about the fact that the appellant made an inquiry about the place from where the chemicals which are used in making fire crackers are purchased. arif has only stated in his deposition that the present .....

Sandipkumar Pankajbhai Patel. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

..... of the court.(g) surrender his passport, if any, to the lower court, within a week.8. if breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned sessions judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.9. bail before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. it would be open to ..... :(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty.(b) not to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner.(c) not act in any manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution.(d) maintain law and order and should cooperate the investigating officers.(e) mark his presence before concerned police station on .....

State of Gujarat. Vs.

Court : Gujarat

..... empowers magistrate to issue summons to any witness at any stage of such proceedings, trial or enquiry. in section 311 the significant expression that occurs is "at any stage of inquiry or trial or other proceeding under this code". it is, however, to be borne in mind that whereas the section confers a very wide power on the court on summoning ..... be made to section 311 of the code which reads as follows:"311. power to summon material witness, or examine person present.any court may, at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this code, summon any person as a witness or examine any person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness or recall and re-examine ..... in the case of suja p. chacko v. state of kerala, 1994 cri.l.j. noc 292 wherein the learned judge observed as under:"the court, while exercising powers under s.311 of the code or s.165 of the evidence act should guard against causing prejudice to the defence or to the prosecution. but that is no reason to pre-empt .....

Chetan Rameshbhai Shah. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

..... matter may be remanded to the trial court for hearing the same on merit in accordance with law. mr. dagli has also placed reliance on a decision of learned single judge of kerala high court, reported in 2005 cri. l.j. 3259.7. i have gone through the papers as well as the rojkam of the trial court, produced ..... the last two dates of the case, therefore, they could not remain present before the court. mr. dagli has contended that the ingredients of section 138 of the act is covered, yet, the learned magistrate has not considered that issue. he has contended that the learned magistrate has not decided the mater on merit and simply dismissed the ..... from the papers, it appears that the complainant has filed complaint under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act on 21.5.2009 and then the verification was recorded on 22.6.2009. thereafter, the learned magistrate has passed order for inquiry under section 202 cr. p.c., and then the complainant was directed to remain present before the court .....

Bhalsingbhai Pohaliyabhai Rathwa Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

..... :00 am to 2:00 pm;(g) surrender his passport, if any, to the lower court immediately.3. if breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the sessions judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter.4. bail before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case.5. rule is made absolute. direct service ..... judge concerned;(e) furnish the address of his residence at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this court;(f) mark ..... to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the following conditions that he shall:(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;(c) maintain law and order;(d) not leave the state of gujarat without prior permission of the sessions .....

Kanchanbhai Zaverbhai Baria Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

..... guilty for the offences charged against them. however, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, the sentence awarded by the learned judge is very harsh. the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants has also not argued the matter seriously on merit and contended that the appellants accused ..... view of above, the appeal is partly allowed. the judgment and order of conviction dated 14.05.2009 passed by learned 5^th additional district & sessions judge, vadodara, in sessions case no.149 of 2007 convicting the appellants accused for the offences charged against them is hereby confirmed. however, the sentence awarded by ..... and thereby committed an offence under sections 143, 147, 148, 325, 326, 302, 504, 114 of i.p. code and section 135 of bombay police act. thereafter the complainant lodged complaint with dabhoi police station. the police registered the offence against the accused and carried out investigation. thereafter, the accused were arrested.3. .....

Acme Pharmaceuticals Vs. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : LC2010(1)217

..... to be dismissed.35. having heard learned counsels appearing for the parties and having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned city civil judge, ahmedabad in interim application granting injunction in favour of the respondent - plaintiff and having considered the rival submissions of the parties in light of the statutory ..... from claiming interim reliefs. there were also other equivalent trade marks currently in the market against which the plaintiffs did not take any action. the single judge accepted the defence of delay while issuing interim injunction against use of identical containers but refused to issue restraint order against use of infringing trade mark. the ..... provisions contained in the trade marks act as well as the decided case law on the subject, the court is of the view that the learned city civil judge has committed a grave error of law and facts in granting interim injunction in favour of .....

Jadavji Deshi and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2010CriLJ686

..... gets progressively congested resulting into abnormal mental condition in the later stage of suffering. it was admitted that normally the pain killers were administered only after the police inquiries are carried out thus, the oral statements stated to have been made after 3.00 p.m. on 1.1.1988 by the deceased and treated as dying ..... 498-a read with section 114 of indian penal code, as well as by the state, from the judgment and order dated 15.9.1992 of learned additional sessions judge, jamnagar in sessions case no. 66 of 1988.2. on 1.1.1988, deceased bhavnaben was brought to the hospital with severe burn injuries and her complaint ..... consistent and proved beyond reasonable doubt involvement of all the accused persons in driving her to commit suicide. adoption of the presumption under section 113a of the evidence act require consideration of all the other relevant circumstances which include absence of any cogent or specific evidence as regards how, when and in what manner the deceased was .....