Court : Gujarat
..... ) notact in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;e) notleave the state of gujarat till the disposal of sessions casewithout the prior permission of the concerned sessions judge.f) notenter into the territorial limits of salabatpura police station,surat, and he shall mark his presence on the every last day ofenglish calender month;f) furnishaddress of his residence ..... prior permission of this court;g) surrenderhis passport, if any, to the lower court within a week.if breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned sessions judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.bail before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. it would be open to the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... of this court;h) surrenderhis passport, if any, to the lower court within a week.7. ifthe breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concernedsessions judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriateaction in the matter.8. bailbefore the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. it wouldbe open to the trial ..... police station on every 15th of the monthbetween 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. f) notleave the country without the prior permission of the concernedsessions judge;g) furnishthe address of his residence to the i.o. and also to the court at thetime of execution of the bond and shall not change the residencewithout prior ..... i-125 of 2011 registered with panigate police station, dist.vadodara for the offences u/s. 307, 323, 504 of the ipc and undersection 135 of the bombay police act. 3. heardmr.p.p.majmudar, learned counsel for the applicant. mr.majmudar hassubmitted under instructions of his client that injured is dischargedfrom the hospital. he has submitted that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... appellant and ms. e.shailaja learned counsel for the respondents. the main contentionraised by the appellant is that inquiry proceedings u/s.7-a of thee.p.f. act is sought to be initiated against the appellant, withoutconsidering the objections tendered by the employees of thecontractors and ..... same are expunged.4. inview of the above, the appeal is allowed to the extent that the orderpassed by the learned single judge dated 26.07.2011 in special civilapplication no.6286 of 2011 is quashed and set aside. therespondent-authority may proceed with the impugned ..... law as to the interpretation of the constitution of india, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?5whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?=========================================================navaltechnoplast industries limited - appellant(s)versusemployeesprovident fund organisation - through provident - respondent(s)=========================================================appearance :mrbr gupta forappellant(s) : 1, mr vivek .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... bdivision police station, for the offence punishable under sections302, 323, 324, 325, 504, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the indian penal codeand section 135(1) of the bombay police act. 2. learnedadvocate ms. joshi for the applicant submitted that the applicant isan innocent person and he has been wrongly implicated in thecommission of the offence. she also submitted that prima .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... upa-sarpanch,thereof, after giving him an opportunity of being heard and givingdue notice in that behalf to the panchayats and after such inquiry asit deems necessary, if such member, sarpanch, or, as the case may be,upa-sarpanch has been guilty of misconduct in the ..... post ofsarpanch, passed by the district development officer, surat.2.4 theorders passed by the authorities under the act were subject matter ofchallenge before the learned single judge in a petition being specialcivil application no.4115 of 2010. the learned single jude came tothe conclusion that ..... law as to the interpretation of the constitution of india, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?5whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?=========================================================jitendrasinhshivsinh vansiya - appellant(s)versusstateof gujarat & 5 - respondent(s)=========================================================appearance:mr.nirupamnanavati, sr. counsel with mr s.m.gohilforappellantmrs krina calla, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... against him. 13. as against this, mr.jani, learned additional public prosecutor, has contended that the judgment and order passed by the learned additional sessions judge is absolutely just and legal. he has contended that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. he has contended that looking to the overall ..... demanded any money nor accepted the same. 8. after considering the oral as well as documentary evidence and after hearing the parties, the learned additional sessions judge, surat vide impugned judgment and order dated 30th april, 1997 held the appellantaccused guilty to the charges levelled against him as mentioned aforesaid. 9. ..... dated 30th april, 1997 passed by the learned additional sessions judge, surat, in special case no.08 of 1992, whereby the learned additional sessions judge was pleased to convict the appellant for the offence punishable under section 7 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... remit the amount before the prescribed period of limitation to file appeal expires, cannot be held as just and proper action. learned single judge also took the view that although the act may not have expressly provided for any time limit, for which, the adjudicating authority or the recovery officer should refrain from taking coercive ..... employees provident fund organization through assistant provident fund commissioner, rajkot, challenging the judgment and order dated 1.5.2009 passed by the learned single judge, whereby, the learned single judge disposed of the petition issuing certain directions to the appellant (original respondent) in the writ petition. 2. brief facts relevant for the purpose ..... and (b) determine the amount due from any employer under any provision of this act, the scheme or the [pension] scheme or the insurance scheme, as the case may be, and for any of the aforesaid purpose may conduct such inquiry as he may deem necessary.] 17. section 7(b) speaks about review of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... of procedural provisions other than of a fundamental nature, the theory of substantial compliance would be available. in such cases, complaint/ objection in this score have to be judged on the touchstone of prejudice, as explained later in this judgment. in other words, the test is: all things taken together whether the delinquent officer/employee had or ..... reconsidered in the case of shailesh jadavji varia v. sub-registrar & ors. [(1996) 3 glr 783] (for short a decision by a larger bench consisting of five judges) 8. the decision of first full bench in the case of gorva bibhag co-operative housing societies association and anr. (supra) to meet with various contentions raised including ..... the act is not done within that period. 79. in this connection, it may be profitable to refer to a recent decision of the hon'ble supreme court in state bank of patiala and ors. v. s.k. sharma . in that case, the respondent was working as a branch manager of the appellant bank. departmental inquiry was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... bail and shall not be construed as an expression of the final opinion in the main matter. 6. if breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the sessions judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter. 7. bail before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. 8. rule is made absolute. application is ..... amount to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the conditions that they shall: (1) not take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty; (2) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; (3) maintain law and order; (4) shall not enter valsad taluka till the completion of the trial; (5) not leave .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... prior permission of this court; 5. surrender their passport, if any, to the lower court immediately. if breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the sessions judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter. 6. bail before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. 7. rule is made absolute. application ..... the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the conditions that they shall : 1. not take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty; 2. not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; 3. maintain law and order; mark their presence before the concerned police station twice in a month between 10 ..... 5. prima facie, i am of the view that this is not a case of culpable homicide amounting to murder. it was not a pre-planned or pre-meditated act. all of a sudden, there was provocation in words wherein the accused applicants picked up stones lying in the field and inflicted on the prosecution party. unfortunately, the .....
Tag this Judgment!