Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-12-1967
..... security provision in the contract under which a substantial minority of the employees may have been forced into membership." 358 f.2d at 660. but the relevant inquiry here is not what motivated a member's full membership, but whether the taft-hartley amendments prohibited disciplinary measures against a full member who crossed his union' ..... the court of appeals for the seventh circuit, a panel of that court upheld the board's decision. following a rehearing en banc, however, the court, three judges dissenting, withdrew the panel opinion, held that the locals' conduct violated 8(b)(1)(a), and remanded to the board for appropriate proceedings. 358 f.2d 656 ..... [ footnote 30 ] however, page 388 u. s. 193 even were there evidence that congress shared this concern, [ footnote 31 ]this would not justify reading the act also to bar court enforcement of reasonable fines. [ footnote 32 ] the 1959 landrum-griffin amendments, thought to be the first comprehensive regulation by congress of the conduct of .....
Tag this Judgment!