Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... said context, it is relevant to note that in the case of junjamma & ors., v. bda & ors.,4 a learned single judge of this court considering the scope of power under section 15 of the act has held as follows:4. ilr2005kar608234 10. previous approval of the government under section 15(2) is required for undertaking works for development of the bangalore metropolitan area. similarly ..... some landowners and release their land from acquisition and deny the same benefit to other landowners by creating artificial distinction. passing different orders in exercise of its power under section 48 of the act in respect of persons similarly situated relating to the same acquisition proceedings and for the same public purpose is definitely violative of article 14 of the constitution and ..... purpose by following the prescribed procedure cannot claim as a matter of right for release of his/her land from acquisition but where the state government exercises its power under section 48 of the act for withdrawal from acquisition in respect of a particular land, the landowners who are similarly situated have a right of similar treatment by the state government. equality ..... the hon ble supreme court in bondu ramaswamy,6, the same was not followed, which has resulted in this court in the case of sri k.p.anjanappa11 appointing a committee of three members and issuing various directions.63. at this juncture, the observations made by this court while considering the acquisitions made by the bda are required to be .....
Tag this Judgment!