Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Court: karnataka Page 10 of about 6,699 results (0.114 seconds)

Apr 28 2016 (HC)

Prof H Maheshappa Vs. The Hon'ble Governor of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF APRIL2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION No.14965/2016 (S-RES) BETWEEN : PROF. H. MAHESHAPPA S/O H. GONIBASAPPA, AGED ABOUT56YEARS, VICE-CHANCELLOR, VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, (UNDER SUSPENSION) JNANA SANGAMA, BELAGAVI 590018, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NO9 PUTTENAHALLI, J.P. NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU 560078. ... PETITIONER R (BY SRI P. S. RAJAGOPAL, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI S. R. DODAWAD, ADV.) AND:1. THE HONBLE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA CUM THE CHANCELLOR OF VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, RAJ BHAVAN, BENGALURU 560001, REP. BY ITS SECRETRY. VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY JNANA SANGAMA, BELAGAVI 590018, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR.2.3. 2 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION (UNIVERSITY) M. S. BUILDINGS, BENGALURU 560001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S. S. NAGANAND, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI K. KRISHNA, ADV. FOR C/R1; SRI T. S. VENKATESH, ADV. FOR R2; ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1983 (HC)

M.F. Ansari Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ330Kant

ORDER1. In this batch of eight writ petitions filed by ex-Railway servants questioning the legality of the orders by which penalty of dismissal from service was imposed against them, after dispensing with the enquiry, in exercise of the powers under R. 14(ii) of the Railway Servants Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) read with clause (b) of the second proviso to Clause (2) of Art. 311 of the Constitution, the following important questions of law arise for consideration : (i) Whether after dispensing with the disciplinary enquiry against a civil servant, on the ground that it is not reasonably practicable to hold the enquiry, in exercise of the powers under Clause (b) of the second proviso to Clause (2) of Art. 311 of the Constitution and R. 14(ii) of the Rules, an opportunity should be given by the concerned disciplinary authority to the concerned civil servant to make representation against the imposition of penalty (ii) Whether the reasons in sup...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 1992 (HC)

The Assistant Charity Commissioner, Camp, Belgaum Vs. K. Shamrao and O ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1993CriLJ901; ILR1993KAR45; 1993(1)KarLJ20

ORDER1. The Assistant Charity Commissioner, Belgaum has referred certain material published by the respondents in Samyukta Karnataka Kannada daily for taking action for contempt of his Court. The respondents-accused are the Managing Editor, Editor and Printer and Publisher respectively of the said news daily published from Hubli. The items published in the said newspaper dated 16-4-92, 17-4-92 and 18-4-92 are scandalous and intended to interfere with the administration of justice which in turn would have impact on the mind of the litigant public approaching the petitioner for redressal of their grievances. 2. In their objections, inter alia, the respondents contended that the Charity Commissioner or an Assistant Charity Commissioner is not a Court and therefore the petitioner could not have made a reference to this Court to take action for contempt. We deemed it necessary to raise and determine the preliminary point, namely, whether the Assistant Charity Commissioner-petitioner is a 'C...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2003 (HC)

S.M. Rao and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4678

Nayak, J.1. What arises for decision in these Writ Appeals and Writ Petition is the validity of the proposal/action of the Karnataka Electricity Board (for short 'the Board') in erecting high tension line over the lands of the appellants for supply of additional power-500 KVA to M/s.Widia (India) Limited (for short 'the Widia'). The above action of the Board was assailed by the writ petitioners on the grounds that the same was contrary to the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 (for short, 'the Supply Act') and the Rules framed thereunder, Section 76M of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, (for short, 'the Planning Act') and Condition 1(a) of the Work Order dated 27.05.1994. A learned Single Judge of this Court without finding any merit in the above contentions raised by the Writ Petitioners, by his common order dated the 5th day of April 1999, has dismissed the Writ Petitions.2. The events leading to filing of the Writ Petitio...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2016 (HC)

Prof. H. Maheshappa Vs. The Hon ble Governor of Karnataka cum The chan ...

Court : Karnataka

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the notification dated 14.3.2016 issued by the R-1 vide annexure-K and etc.) 1. Challenging the Notification (suspension order) dated 14.03.2016, passed by His Excellency the Governor of Karnataka, as the Chancellor of Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belgaum, whereby the petitioner, the Vice-Chancellor of the said University has been suspended, the petitioner has knocked at the doors of this court. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that by a notification dated 30.06.2010 with effect from 02.07.2010, the petitioner, Prof. H. Maheshappa, was appointed as the Vice-Chancellor of the said University. The said appointment was for a period of three years. However, prior to completion of the said tenure, by notification dated 21.06.2014, the petitioner s term as the Vice-Chancellor was extended till 30.06.2016. During his tenure as the Vice-Chancellor, a large number of compl...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2022 (HC)

Ravi S/o Basavarajappa Kumatagi Vs. The Principal Secretary

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

- 1 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT WRIT APPEAL No.100139 OF2022(LA-RES) C/W WRIT APPEAL NO.100062 OF2022(LA-RES) IN WA NO.100139/2022 BETWEEN:1. MR. GOPAL S/O GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY,MUDHOL2 MR. UMESH S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOL, MODHOL TALUK DIST. BAGALKOT3 MR. ARUN S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOLD, MUDHOL TALUK AND DIST. BAGALKOT APPELLANTS (BY SRI. C V ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT - 2 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 M S BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R AND R) LAND ACQUISITION, EX- OFFICIO SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, UPPER...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2022 (HC)

Mr. Gopal S/o Govind Karjol Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

- 1 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT WRIT APPEAL No.100139 OF2022(LA-RES) C/W WRIT APPEAL NO.100062 OF2022(LA-RES) IN WA NO.100139/2022 BETWEEN:1. MR. GOPAL S/O GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY,MUDHOL2 MR. UMESH S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOL, MODHOL TALUK DIST. BAGALKOT3 MR. ARUN S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOLD, MUDHOL TALUK AND DIST. BAGALKOT APPELLANTS (BY SRI. C V ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT - 2 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 M S BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R AND R) LAND ACQUISITION, EX- OFFICIO SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, UPPER...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2023 (HC)

M/s Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt Ltd Vs. Central Bureau Of Investiga ...

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF JUNE, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1152 OF2022BETWEEN:1. . M/S. SHREE MALLIKARJUN SHIPPING PVT. LTD., OL OF MARCES BUILDING, OPP. KADAMBA BUS STAND, MUDAVEL, VASCO DAGAMA, GOA 403 802. REPRESENTED BY SRI SATISH KRISHNA SAIL @ SATISH SAIL MANAGING DIRECTOR ALSO AT: M/S. SHREE MALLIKARJUN SHIPPING PVT. LTD., MOHAN NH - 17, CHITTAKULA, SADASHIVGAD KARWAR 581 301. 2 . SRI SATISH KRISHNA SAIL @ SATISH SAIL S/O LATE KRISHNA SAIL AGED ABOUT51YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. SHREE MALLIKARJUN SHIPPING PVT. LTD., 2 MOHAN NH -17, CHITTAKULA, SADASHIVGAD KARWAR 581 301. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI H.PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANTI-CORRUPTION BRANCH BELLARY ROAD, BENGALURU 560 032. 2 . SRI SUSHIL KUMAR VALECHA, S/O KISHAN CHAND VALECHA , AGED ABOUT73YEARS, DIRECTOR, M/S. SHRI LAL MAHAL LIMITED, B-5, BHAGWAN DAS NAGAR, EAST PUNJAB BAGH, NE...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2023 (HC)

Shri Shashi Prasad Gandhi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF JULY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION No.10843 OF2021(GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.12030 OF2020(GM-RES) IN WP. NO.10843 OF2021BETWEEN : SHRI. SHASHI PRASAD GANDHI @ S.P. GANDHI S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT55YEARS OCC:ADVOCATE R/O THYAGRAJ NAGAR WARD NO.5 TALUK OFFICE ROAD DEVANAHALLI TOWN BANGALORE 562 110. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.A. DEVNAND, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI B. GOWDA, ADVOCATES) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEFF SECRETARY2VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001. 2 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY DPAR, SERVICES VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001. 3 . SHRI. SHIVASHANKARAPPA S. SAHUKAR CHAIRMAN, KPSC BENGALURU 560 001.4. KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PARK HOUSE BANGALORE 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRABHULING K.NAVADGI, ADVOCATE GENERAL A/...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2023 (HC)

T Narasimhamurthy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF JULY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION No.10843 OF2021(GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.12030 OF2020(GM-RES) IN WP. NO.10843 OF2021BETWEEN : SHRI. SHASHI PRASAD GANDHI @ S.P. GANDHI S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT55YEARS OCC:ADVOCATE R/O THYAGRAJ NAGAR WARD NO.5 TALUK OFFICE ROAD DEVANAHALLI TOWN BANGALORE 562 110. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.A. DEVNAND, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI B. GOWDA, ADVOCATES) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEFF SECRETARY2VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001. 2 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY DPAR, SERVICES VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001. 3 . SHRI. SHIVASHANKARAPPA S. SAHUKAR CHAIRMAN, KPSC BENGALURU 560 001.4. KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PARK HOUSE BANGALORE 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRABHULING K.NAVADGI, ADVOCATE GENERAL A/...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //