Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-24-2024
..... committee under the commission of inquiry act, 1952 . it appears from the terms of reference of the high- level single member inquiry committee that there are serious allegation involving illegal allotment of alternative sites, illegal allotment of land and irregularities in allocation of land. further, the constituting of a committee under an ias officer and immediately constituting one more committee under a retired judge of the high court and the governments own acceptance that there is a potential big ticket scam in the allotment of sites by muda does not inspire ..... the petitioner and reject the petition seeking sanction so filed by the 3rd respondent. the cabinet was presided over by sri d.k. shivakumar, deputy chief minister of the state of karnataka as he was nominated to do so by the chief minister. the preamble reads as follows: show cause notice issued by the hon ble governor of karnataka to the chief minister to respond within 7 days as to why sanction for prosecution should ot be granted as requested by one shri t.j.abraham in ..... records indicating that the rights of sri.ninga s/o javara has been relinquished/turned over to one sri. mylariah is enclosed herewith and marked as annexure-a and a copy of the registered document dated 29.10.1968 is enclosed herewith and marked as annexure-a-1.2. the ec - encumbrance certificate (hand written/entered) since 01-01-1959 to 31-12-2003 indicates that: a. on 24.10.1970 sri. mylaraiah mortgaged the 3 acres & 16 guntas of lands, in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-26-2024
REPORTABLE2024INSC348IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5366-5367 OF2024FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF INDIA APPELLANTS LIMITED & ORS. VERSUS M/S COROMANDAL SACKS PRIVATE LIMITED RESPONDENT JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ............................................................................................. 2 i. Case of the original plaintiff before the trial court ...................................... 4 ii. Case of the original defendants before the trial court .................................. 6 iii. Appeals before the High Court .................................................................... 9 B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANTS/ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS .................................................................................................... 10 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT/ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF ..........
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-15-2024
2024 INSC775REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10611 OF2024Omkar Ramchandra Gond Appellant (s) Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. Omkar Ramchandra Gond (the appellant) grew up in a middle-class family in the city of Latur in Maharashtra State. His father is a government servant. The appellant had a creditable academic performance in his tenth standard scoring 97.2%. He cleared his school final in the first division. The appellant aspired to be a doctor. Nothing wrong with it, except that he had to surmount a few legal hurdles enroute. 12. Admittedly, the appellant has speech and language disability and is diagnosed with Hypernasality with Misarticulation IN K/C/O Repaired Bilateral CLEFT of palate. The appellant is certified to have 45% (in some reports, it was mentioned as 44%) permanent disability as per the Disability Certificate dated 18.05.2017.3. The appellant applied for the Nationa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-04-2024
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC658IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.20817 OF2022KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY & ANR. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS T.P. MURALI @ MURALI THAVARA PANEN & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. Heard Shri R. Basant, senior counsel for the petitioner and Shri Gaurav Agrawal, senior counsel for the respondent.2. Kerala Agricultural University has preferred this Special Leave Petition challenging the judgment and order dated 26.08.2022 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala in Writ Appeal No.298 of 2022, T.P. Murali vs. Kerala Agricultural University. The Division Bench 1 after setting aside the judgment dated 21.12.2021 passed in Writ Petition (C) No.17803 of 2021, quashed the order dated 30.07.2021 passed by the Vice Chancellor of the university terminating the services of the respondent T.P. Murali.3. The Division Bench in allowing the writ appeal, though quashed the termination order pass...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-23-2024
..... development phase of the event and is of no utility when the crop is being cultivated by a farmer. 18.13 it was also pointed out that under the ep act, 1986, and the insecticides act, 1968, use of herbicide is, anyway, not permitted in the field for cultivation of transgenic mustard hybrid dmh-11. iii. yield:18. 14 learned attorney general contended that in the brl- i and brl-ii trials, an increase in per-hectare yield by 25-30 per cent has been demonstrated against national check varuna and zonal ..... has also to be made to article 51a(h) of the constitution of india which imposes a fundamental duty upon all in the following terms: h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform; 130 | w.p. (c) 115 of 2004 & ors. 38.1 this court in aiims students' union v. aiims (3-judge bench)44 observed: 58. fundamental duties, as defined in article 51- a, are not made enforceable by a writ of court just as the fundamental rights are, but it cannot be lost sight ..... fssa, 2006 has been enacted pursuant to entry 52, list i of the seventh schedule of the constitution. writ petition (civil) no.115 of 2004 etc. page 138 of 260 section 2 of the said act has declared that it is expedient in the public interest that the union should take under its control the food industry. 23.2 the preamble of the fssa, 2006, inter alia, states that it is an act to consolidate the laws relating to food and to establish the fssai for laying down science-based standards for articles of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-22-2024
..... c) no.17402 of 2017 page 1 of 143 adhiniyam, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as act of 1959 , for brevity sake). bird s eye view of the controversy:3. whether statutory vesting of property termed as enemy property under the provisions of the enemy property act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act for the sake of convenience) amounts to expropriation ..... page 9 of 143 property and not property of the union or central government. therefore, it was submitted: a) that the property is merely in the custody of the custodian as specified under the act. that the preamble of the act provides that this is an act to provide for the continued vesting of enemy property . that there is no declaration by the union government through any legislation declaring the properties to be the property of the union government. the ..... , the details including depositions shall be furnished to the parties. (7) the chairperson, after examining the evidence and calling for further reports and inquiry as may be necessary, shall pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, and a copy of the said orders shall be sent to the parties.11. articles ..... article broadly corresponds to section 155 of the government of india act, 1935 but has certain other conditions thereto. articles 285 and 289 provide for the immunity of the property of the union and the state from mutual taxation on the basis of the federal principle. ndmc is a decision of nine-judge bench which dealt with a question whether the properties .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-25-2024
Reportable 2024 INSC554IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 4056-4064 of 1999 Mineral Area Development Authority & Anr. Appellants Versus M/S Steel Authority of India & Anr Etc. Respondents With Civil Appeal No.7937 of 2019 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.512 of 2018 With Civil Appeal No.7938 of 2019 With Civil Appeal No.7936 of 2019 With Civil Appeal No.6221 of 2008 With Civil Appeal No.5250 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.729 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1029 of 2019 With Special Leave Petition (C) No.16028 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No.4286 of 2023 1 With Civil Appeal No.5682 of 2007 With Civil Appeal No.1295 of 2008 With Civil Appeal No.874 of 2013 With Civil Appeal Nos. 8269-8271 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8268 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8267 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.6135 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8272 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.9458 of 2013 With Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18600 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.4...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-23-2024
REPORTABLE2024INSC716IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2161-2162 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NOS. 3665-3666 OF2024 JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. HARISH & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................ 4 B. IMPUGNED ORDER .............................................................................. 10 C. SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES ...................................................... 16 i. Submissions on behalf of the Appellants. .................................................... 16 ii. Submissions on behalf of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR). .......................................................................................... 18 iii. Submissions...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-17-2024
2024 INSC451REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.29 OF2021SHAJI POULOSE .. PETITIONER VERSUS INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.267 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.272 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.371 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.581 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.670 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1084 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1200 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1256 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1291 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1295 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1360 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2022T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 1 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.186 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.833 OF2022TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.28 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.30 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.31 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.33 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-14-2024
2024 INSC410REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2646 OF2009BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT JASBIR SINGH MALIK APPELLANT(S) VERSUS D. K. GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No.2647 OF2009DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT APPELLANT(S) VERSUS D. K. GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No.2648 OF2009BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA THROUGH BY ITS SECRETARY MR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN APPELLANT(S) VERSUS D. K. GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) 1 WITH C.A. No.2649 OF2009M. MATHIAS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS D. K. GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. An important question of law pertaining to the Legal Profession as a whole that has fallen for consideration before this Court is whether a complaint alleging deficiency in service again...
Tag this Judgment!