Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-17-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.576 OF2016INDIAN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION (AHAR) & ANR. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.24 OF2017A N D WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.119 OF2017JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.This batch of three Writ Petitions was heard together and is being disposed of by this Common Judgment as similar issues and prayers are raised in all these petitions.2) The instant writ petitions have been preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging certain provisions of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurant and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein) Act, 2016 (hereinafter 2 referred to as the Act) and also the Rules framed there under being the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurant and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-28-2019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No.6677 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(C) No.36771 of 2016) STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. .Appellants VERSUS LORD NORTHBROOK AND ORS. .Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 17.11.2016 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench in DB Civil Writ Petition No.2713 of 1987 in and by which the High Court quashed the communications/orders dated 03.07.1987, 22.07.1987 and 03.08.1987 passed by the Deputy Secretary, Revenue, Govt. of Rajasthan, District Collector, Jhunjhunu and Tehsildar, Khetri respectively in the matter of taking over the properties of Sh. Raja Sardar Singh by the State under the Rajasthan Escheats Regulation Act, 1956. 1 3. Sh. Raja Sardar Singh expired on 28.01.1987 intestate and without any legal heirs. Sh. Raja Sardar Singh was a Bar at law from England, a member of the Constituent Assembly, a Rajya Sabha Member and also Ambass...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-11-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 10605/2015 & CM Appls.45216/2016, 16307/2017, 43155/2018, 47492/2018 &16807/2018 SURAZ INDIATRUST ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Daiya in person versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT1109.2019 per D.N.PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed by an organisation going by name of Suraz India Trust, through its chairman Rajiv Daiya, purportedly filed in public interest.2. It prays, inter alia, that the right of the people of India, who seeks legal recourse on being injured/victimization as a result of breach of laws, the right of complainant in the case of injuries, etc., be protected and various provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 be struck down. W.P. (C) 10605/2015 Page 1 of 18 3. The said writ petition has been filed under the liberty granted, by the Supreme Court, to do so, vide its order dated 06th Decembe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-23-2019
+ W.P.(C) 104/2008 BHUVANESH VYAS Date of decision:23. 04.2019 ........ Petitioner * $~R~10A IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.A.P. Nagrath, Adv. versus I.G.N.O.U. Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside office order no.488 dated 07.04.1993 communicated vide letter dated 11.06.1993. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondents to take the petitioner back on duty with all consequential benefits.2. The brief facts of the case are the petitioner was appointed as Senior Software Engineer in IGNOU in the pay scale of 3700-6700 vide letter dated 02.06.1989 and joined on 11.07.1989 at Delhi. Thereafter the petitioner was confirmed w.e.f. 11.07.1990 vide letter dated 6/7.02.1991.3. The petitioner applied for leave for 90 days to visit USA vide W.P.(C) 104/2008 Page 1 of 10 application dated 04.09.1992 and his leave application was a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-12-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12h DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.955/2019 c/w CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.959/2019 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.969/2019 IN CRL.RP No.955/2019:BETWEEN : Sri D.K.Shivakumar S/o D.K.Kempegowda Aged about 58 years R/at No.252, 18th Cross Sadashivanagar Bengaluru-560 080.... Petitioner (By Sri B.V.Acharya, Senior Counsel, for Sri Aravind V. Chavan, Advocate) AND: Income Tax Department By its Deputy Director of Income Tax (Inv), Unit-3(1), C.R. Building (Annexe) Queens Road, Bengaluru-560 001, Represented by Special Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka Bengaluru-560 001. Respondent (By Sri G.Rajagopalan, Addl. Solicitor General a/w Sri Jeevan J.Neeralgi, Senior Standing Counsel) in Spl.C.C.No.759.2018 dismissing This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C praying to set aside the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the Honble LXXXI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-06-2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION No.56994/2018 (S DE) ..... PetitionerBETWEEN : Professor Giridhar Madras s/o Mr V Mohan Aged about 51 years r/a No.516, V Block Skyline City, Nagarbhavi Bengaluru 560 012. (By Sri Aditya Sondhi, Sr.Counsel for Sri Karan Joseph, Advocate) AND: 1.2.3. Ms.NJ TheInternal Committee against Sexual Harassment The Indian Institute of Science C V Raman Road Bengaluru 560 012 Represented by its Chairperson. The Indian Institute of Science CV Raman Road Bengaluru 560 012 Represented by its Chairman. Fathers name not known to the petitioner Aged about 30 years 2 R/a IISc Hostel CV Raman Road Bengaluru-560 012. ..... RESPONDENTS (By Sri S S Ramdas, Sr.Counsel for R1, Sri K Anandarama, Advocate for R2, Sri Abhilash Raju, Advocate for R3) impugned This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned or...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B V NAGARATHNA R AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A.NO.7227 OF2017(MV D) C/W M.F.A.NO.7285 OF2017(MV D) IN M.F.A. NO.7227 OF2017BETWEEN : LEGAL MANAGER, IFFICO TOKIO GIC LTD., SHANTHI TOWERS, 5TH FLOOR, NO.141, 3RD MAIN, EAST OF NGEF LAYOUT, KASTURABANAGAR, BANGALORE560043. APPELLANT (BY SRI A.N.KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT.NAGENDRAM LACHI, AGED ABOUT30YEARS, W/O LATE BRAHMAM LACHI.2. MASTER MUKESHCHANDRA LACHI, @ LACHI MUKESHCHANDRA AGED ABOUT11YEARS, S/O LATE BRAHMAM LACHI.3. KUMARI PAVANCHANDRIKA LACHI, @ LACHI PAVANCHANDRIKA, AGED ABOUT7YEARS, D/O LATE BRAHMAM LACHI.-.-"4. SMT.LACHI MALLESWARI, @ MALLESHWARAMMA LACHI, NOW AGED ABOUT56TEARS, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM LACHI.5. SRI NAGABHUSHANAM LACHI @ BUSHI LACHI, NOW AGED ABOUT61YEARS, S/O LATE SUBBA RAO LACHI @ SUBBA RAO. ALL ARE R/AT NO.22/37, 8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, VENKATAPURA, KORAMANGALA, 1S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-20-2019
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 BEFORE: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1377 OF2018BETWEEN :1. K.C. VIJAYAKUMARA, S/O. LATE CHIKKAMALLAYYA, AGED ABOUT44YEARS, TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER, PRESENTLY WORKING IN GOVERNMENT MODEL HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PRESENTLY NOW R/AT VENKATAPURA, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-561 202.2. K.C. BASAVARAJ, S/O LATE CHIKKAMALLAYYA, AGED ABOUT47YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF KOLALA VILLAGE, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 129. PETITIONERS [BY SRI. GANGADHARAPPA A.V., ADVOCATE]. AND: SMT. S. GEETHA, W/O. K.C. VIJAYAKUMARA, AGED ABOUT30YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.5/1, BASAVESHWARA NILAYA, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, 2 DEEPANJALINAGARA, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 026. RESPONDENT [BY SRI. DINESH GAONKAR, ADVOCATE]. * * * THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION397READ WITH401OF CRL. P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED1411.2018 PASSED BY THE COURT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-06-2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE06H DAY OF DECEMBER2019BEFORE THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.348 OF2016PETITIONERBETWEEN : SRI. P. TARACHAND S/O PRATAPCHAND OSWAL AGED ABOUT64YEARS, R/AT NO.78,79, & 80, DIAGONAL ROAD, V V PURAM, BENGALURU56000. (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.JOSE SEBASTIAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . SRI SESHAMAL M JAIN S/O LATE MIACHAND AGED ABOUT82YEARS, NO.10/3, NPS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU-560 004. 2 . SRI NEMICHAND JAIN S/O SESHAMAL M JAIN AGED ABOUT61YEARS, NO.10/3, NPS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU-560 004. 3 . SRI BABHUTMAL S/O PRATAPCHAND OSWAL AGED ABOUT66YEARS, R/ATNo.80, DIAGNAL ROAD V.V.PURAM, GANDHI BAZAR BENGALURU560004. 2 4 . SRI V HIRACHAND S/O K VIRACHANDJI AGED ABOUT68YEARS, AUDITOR, NO.123, KILARIROAD, 1ST FLOOR, BENGALURU-560 053. 5 . SRI KUMARPAL S/O LATE K VIRACHANDJI AGED ABOUT64YEARS, R/AT NO.498, NEW TOWN BANGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT563114. RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI.SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOC...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-25-2019
--"R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25h DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.3806 OF2019[LAC].BETWEEN : THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, BENGALURU560001.... APPELLANT (BY SRI VASANT FERNANDES, HCGP) AND: M/S. S.V. GLOBAL MILL LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO.106, ARMENIAN STREET, CHENNAI, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY & MANAGER, MR.K.JOHNSON.... RESPONDENT (BY SRI SAJAN POOVAYYA AND DR.ADITYA SONDHI, SENIOR ADVOCATES FOR SRI SHIRISH KRISHNA & SMT. MONICA PATIL, ADVOCATES) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION541) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED2910/2018 PASSED IN LAC No.33 OF2017ON --"THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU ...
Tag this Judgment!