Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-06-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:27. 10.2017 Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2018 + W.P.(CRL) 725/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.3947/2017 DR. NAVTEJ SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Malhotra, Mr. Ranjeet Malhotra & Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Advocates along with petitioner - Dr.Navtej Singh, and Mr. Mohinder Singh - in person. versus STATE OF NCT & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS SI Surender Kr., PS Hari Nagar, for the State. Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Prianka Rao & Ms. Rytim Vohra, Advocates for and along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner herein has preferred the present writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus for production of his minor children, Ishnoor Kaur and Paramvir Singh, who are presently of ages five years and W.P.(CRL) 725/2017 Page 1 of 54 one year respectively. Ishnoor who was born in U.S.A on 27.08.2012 is a permanen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-20-2018
..... unequivocal terms, hold that section 154 of the code postulates the mandatory registration of firs on receipt of all cognizable offences, yet, there may be instances where preliminary inquiry may be required owing to the change in genesis and novelty of crimes with the passage of time. one such instance is in the case of allegations relating to medical negligence on the ..... superior court against the court of session or the high court is always available. irrational and indiscriminate arrests are gross violation of human rights 115. in joginder kumar case (supra) a three-judge bench of this court has referred to the 3rd report of the national police commission, in which it is mentioned that the quality of arrests by the police in india mentioned the power of ..... 1872) 36 jp jo 54: there is no judicial body in the country by which the validity of an act of parliament could be questioned. an act of the legislature is superior in authority to any court of law. and ungoed thomas j., in cheney v. conn, (1968) 1 all er779referred to a parliamentary statute as "the highest form of law...which prevails over every ..... the atrocities act should not result in perpetuating casteism which can have an adverse impact on integration of the society and the constitutional values. such concern has also been expressed by this court on several occasions. secularism is a basic feature of the constitution. irrespective of caste or religion, the constitution guarantees equality in its preamble as well as other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-16-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.3807-3825 OF2018(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.35281-35299 OF2016 Mohammad Yusuf and Others Etc. Etc. .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and Others. .... Respondent(s) WITH (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.3585 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.3826 OF2018(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 4413-4445 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3827-3859 OF2018AND JUDGMENT R.K.Agrawal,J12) Leave granted. The above appeals have been filed against the impugned common judgment and order dated 03.06.2016 passed by learned single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.F.A. No.6617 of 2012 (O&M) and other 1 connected matters whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellants herein while dismissing the cross appeals of the respondent-State.3) Brief Facts:- (a) The Government of Haryana, Revenue Department, vide Notification under Section 4 of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-16-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.3807-3825 OF2018(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.35281-35299 OF2016 Mohammad Yusuf and Others Etc. Etc. .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and Others. .... Respondent(s) WITH (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.3585 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.3826 OF2018(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 4413-4445 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3827-3859 OF2018AND JUDGMENT R.K.Agrawal,J12) Leave granted. The above appeals have been filed against the impugned common judgment and order dated 03.06.2016 passed by learned single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.F.A. No.6617 of 2012 (O&M) and other 1 connected matters whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellants herein while dismissing the cross appeals of the respondent-State.3) Brief Facts:- (a) The Government of Haryana, Revenue Department, vide Notification under Section 4 of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-26-2018
..... was irregular. illegal is (emphasis supplied) 384. the prohibition contained in article 122(1) does not provide immunity in cases of illegalities. in this context, reference may also be made to sarojini ramaswami v. union of india, (1992) 4 scc506 the case mainly pertained to article 124(4) read with the judges (inquiry) act, 1968. while dealing, inter alia, with the overriding effect of the rules made under ..... information in possession or control of the authority including information stored in the central identities data repository; and (g) offences and penalties for contravention of relevant statutory provisions. 102. preamble to any act is a key to read and unfold an enactment. the preamble of aadhaar act reads: an act to provide for, as a good governance, efficient, transparent, and targeted delivery of subsidies, benefits and services, the expenditure for which is incurred from the consolidated fund of india, to individuals ..... the lok sabha and the rajya sabha, and the president need to work in constitutional solidarity to ensure that no provision of the constitution is diluted or subverted. 101 the aadhaar act was passed as a money bill. the provisions of the act need to be analysed to determine whether the act is a money bill. the preamble of the act states that it is: an act to provide for, as a good governance, efficient, transparent, and targeted delivery of subsidies, benefits and services, the expenditure for which is incurred from the consolidated fund of india, to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + KRISHAN KHOKAR C B I CRL.A. 753/2013 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Panwar, Advocate with Mr. Vikas Walia and Mr. Suyash Sinha, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate Mr. D. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Ms. Hiral Gupta, Mr. Manu Mishra & Ms. Smrithi Suresh, Advocates for CBI. P. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER1712.2018 1. By a common judgment passed today in Crl.A.1099/2013 (State through CBI v. Sajjan Kumar & Ors.) (certified copy placed below) and Connected Appeals, including the present one, this Court has partly allowed the CBIs appeal and dismissed the present appeal. The impugned judgment dated 30th April 2013 and order on sentence dated 9th May 2013 passed by the District & Sessions Judge, North-east District, Karkardooma Courts in SC No.26/2010 is affirmed.2. Additionally, in the connected appeal Crl.A.1099/2013 preferred by the CBI, the Appellant is further convicted an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-20-2018
CRL.P.No.100819/2018 :1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JUNE, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE DR.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100819/2018 BETWEEN: ANAND BALKRISHNA APPUGOL, CHAIRMAN SHREE KRANTIVEER SANGOLI RAYANNA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, RISALDAR GALLI, BELAGAVI AND FOUNDER MEMBER OF SHREE GAJARAJ CO-OPERATIVE CREIDT SOCIETY LTD., RISALDAR GALLI, BELAGAVI. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH. NANA DHONDIBA DESAI, AGE :70. YEARS, OCCUPATION : NOT KNOWN, R/O.3382/D, GONDHALI GALLI, BELAGAVI. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.NANA DHONDIBA DESAI, PARTY IN PERSON FOR R-1) (BY SRI.PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, HCGP FOR R-2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND CRL.P.No.100819/2018 :2. : SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI IN SPECIAL CASE NO.14 OF2018FOR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Sep-03-2018
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE3R D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2018PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.58751/2017 (S-KAT) BETWEEN SHRI SHRISHAIL SHIVAPPA KOUJALAGI, OCC:CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR, RAILWAYS, HUBBALLI-580020, DT:DHARWAD. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOK R KALYANASHETTY, ADV.) AND1 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NORTH ZONE, BELAGAVI-590001.2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BELGAUM DISTRICT, BELGAUM.3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMES AND INTERNAL AFFAIRS, M S BUILIDNG, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. (BY SRI.RAVI HOSMANI, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED2211.2015 AT ANNEURE-G PASSED BY THE2D RESPONDENT AS WELL AS THE ORDER DATED1803.2016 AT ANNEURE-J PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT IN APPEAL No.11/U VA/2016 AND THE ORDER DATED3005.2017 AT ... RESPONDENTS :2. : ANNEURE-M PA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jan-25-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE25h DAY OF JANUARY2018R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23097 OF2012MV) BETWEEN THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA, INSURANCE CO. LTD., ENKAY COMPLEX, KESHAVAPUR HUBLI. REP. BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE NO.1 KESHAVAPUR. HUBLI ... APPELLANT (By Sri A G JADHAV, ADV.) AND1 SMT.JAYAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA NYAMATHI, AGE:45. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: KUPPELUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR. DIST. HAVERI. SMT. SULOCHANA W/O SANJEEVREDDY REDDER, AGE:27. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MALANAYAKANAHALLI, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI. SMT.RENUKA W/O CHANNAGOUDA PATIL, AGE:25. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GODIHAL TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI PRAVEEN S/O HANUMANTHAPPA NYAMATHI, AGE:24. YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O: KUPPELUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI. KUMARI KAVITA D/O HANUMANTHAPPA NYAMATHI, AGE:22. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD2 3.4. 5.6.7. 2 R/O: KUPPELUR, TQ: RAN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-24-2018
-1- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R DEVDAS MFA NO.5537/2011 (MV) C/W MFA NOS.3182/2011 & 1658/2012 (MV) IN MFA NO.5537/2011 BETWEEN1 SMT.SANGEETHA W/O LATE SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT26YEARS2 SRI.BASAVARAJ, S/O LATE SAGADEVAGANDARA, AGED ABOUT61YEARS3 KUMARI MONISHA, D/O LATE SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT5YEARS4 KUMARI ANJALI, D/O LATE SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT2 YEARS (SINCE THE APPELLANTS3& 4 ARE MINORS, THEY ARE DULY REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN THE1T APPELLANT) -2- ALL ARE RESIDING AT: NO.138/12, 3RD CROSS, 6TH MAIN, PIPELINE ROAD, K. B. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 026. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. A.K BHAT & SRI. GOPALAKRISHNA. N, ADVOCATES FOR SRI. K. N. HARISH BABU & ASSTS, ADVOCATES) AND1 SRI.KRISHNA CHARI2 S/O PUTTACHARI, NO.126, 4TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, CHAMARAJAPET, BANGALORE 560 018. (R.C.OWNER OF THE MOTOR CYCLE BEARING REG.NO.KA-01-ED-2932) THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., D.O....
Tag this Judgment!