Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE No.5/2010 STATE Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Swati Goswami, Adv. for Mr.Dayan Krishnan, ASC with Inspector Rajveer Singh, PS S.P. Badli Versus JAGTAR & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. with Adit S. Pujari, Adv. & Mr.Rahul Kumar, Adv. Crl.A. No.979/2008 AMAR BHADUR THAPAS S/O GYAN BHADUR THAPA .... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Versus STATE Through ..... Respondents Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP S.I. Amit Rathee, PS Model Town. WITH Death Sentence Ref.No.5/2010, Crl.A.Nos.979/2008, 1087/2010 & 1301/2010 1 + Crl.A. No.1087/2010 RAVINDER ..... Petitioner Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Through Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP AND + Crl.A. No.1301/2010 NOOR JAHAN ALIAS HASEENA & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vivek Sood & Mr.Vishwanath Pratap Singh, Advs. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE No.5/2010 STATE Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Swati Goswami, Adv. for Mr.Dayan Krishnan, ASC with Inspector Rajveer Singh, PS S.P. Badli Versus JAGTAR & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. with Adit S. Pujari, Adv. & Mr.Rahul Kumar, Adv. Crl.A. No.979/2008 AMAR BHADUR THAPAS S/O GYAN BHADUR THAPA .... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Versus STATE Through ..... Respondents Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP S.I. Amit Rathee, PS Model Town. WITH Death Sentence Ref.No.5/2010, Crl.A.Nos.979/2008, 1087/2010 & 1301/2010 1 + Crl.A. No.1087/2010 RAVINDER ..... Petitioner Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Through Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP AND + Crl.A. No.1301/2010 NOOR JAHAN ALIAS HASEENA & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vivek Sood & Mr.Vishwanath Pratap Singh, Advs. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE No.5/2010 STATE Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Swati Goswami, Adv. for Mr.Dayan Krishnan, ASC with Inspector Rajveer Singh, PS S.P. Badli Versus JAGTAR & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. with Adit S. Pujari, Adv. & Mr.Rahul Kumar, Adv. Crl.A. No.979/2008 AMAR BHADUR THAPAS S/O GYAN BHADUR THAPA .... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Versus STATE Through ..... Respondents Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP S.I. Amit Rathee, PS Model Town. WITH Death Sentence Ref.No.5/2010, Crl.A.Nos.979/2008, 1087/2010 & 1301/2010 1 + Crl.A. No.1087/2010 RAVINDER ..... Petitioner Mr.Sumer K. Sethi, Adv. Through Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP AND + Crl.A. No.1301/2010 NOOR JAHAN ALIAS HASEENA & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vivek Sood & Mr.Vishwanath Pratap Singh, Advs. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-07-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5387 OF2014(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11686 of 2007) Animal Welfare Board of India . Appellant Versus A. Nagaraja & Ors. . Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5388 OF2014(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.10281 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5389-5390 OF2014(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.18804-18805 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL No.5391 OF2014(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13199 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.5392 OF2014(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13200 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.5393 OF2014(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4598 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL No.5394 OF2014(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12789 of 2014) (@ SLP(C) CC4268 of 2013) WRIT PETITION (C) NO.145 OF2011AND T.C. (C) Nos.84, 85, 86, 97, 98 and 127 of 2013 K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. We are, in these cases, concerned with an issue of seminal importance with regard to the Rights of Animals under our Const...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-23-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.Nos.613 OF2011and batch 23-01-2014 M/s.National Insurance Company Ltd.,Rep., by its Branch Manager,Main Road, Patancheru Town,Medak District....Petitioner Miss Asia & Others.... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Nisaruddin Ahmed Jeddy Counsel for Respondents:Sri C. Pratap Reddy, for R.1 Sri N.S.Bhaskara Rao, for R.4 : : ?. Cases referred:1. 2006(6) ALT1472. 2004(4) ALD5973. 1996 ACJ11784. 2007 (7) SCC445ACJ-2129(SC) 5. AIR2009SC2086. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 7. (2006) 4 SCC2508. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 9. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 10. 2008 ACJ265411. 2008 (1) LS-SC-177 12. (1997) 7 SCC-558 13. (2007) 13 SCC24614. 2008 (1) Scale 531 -contd- 15. 2008 ACJ65416. 2007 ACJ72117. 2001 ACJ84318. 2008 (1) Scale 727 19. JT-2003 (2) SC5952003 ACJ61120. 2010 ACJ16521. 2012 ACJ128422. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 23. 2008 ACJ288524. 2000 ACJ31925. 1996 ACJ1046(SC) 26. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 27. 2008 ACJ149828. AIR2007SC197129. (2004...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-11-2014
THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.389 OF200711-02-2014 M.Swarupa, and three others .... Appellants Musapet Narsimhulu, and another.... Respondents Counsel for the appellants:Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : -- Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri N.Mohan Krishna : : ?.Cases referred:1. 2006 (1) Decisions Today SC4792. 2013 (4) ALD753. 2012 (1) ALT812DB4 AIR2009SC2085. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 6. (2006) 4 SCC2507. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 8. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 9. 2008 ACJ265410. 2008(1)LS-SC-177 11. (1997)7 SCC-558 12. (2007) 13 SCC24613. 2008(1) Scale 531 14. 2008 ACJ65415. 2007 ACJ72116. 2001 ACJ84317. 2008(1) Scale 727 18. JT-2003(2) SC595= 2003 ACJ61119. 2010 ACJ16520. 2012 ACJ128421. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 22. 2008 ACJ288523. 2000 ACJ31924. 1996 ACJ1046(SC) 25. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 26. 2008-ACJ-1498 27. AIR2007SC197128. (2004)2 SCC-1 29. Appeal (Civil) C.C.No.10993 of 2009 30. 2010 (5) ALT10531. 2005 (4) ACJ72132. AI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-02-2014
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.2842 OF201102-01-2014 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.....Appellant Mojes and another.... Respondents Counsel for the appellant : Sri T.Mahender Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Nil : : ?. Cases referred:1. 2005 ACJ15442. 2006 ACJ13363. 2007 ACJ28164. 2008 ACJ6275. 2008 ACJ21616. 2009 ACJ14117. AIR2009SC2088. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 9. (2006) 4 SCC25010. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 11. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 12. 2008 ACJ265413. 2008(1)LS-SC-177 14. (1997)7 SCC-558 15. (2007) 13 SCC24616. 2008(1) Scale 531 17. 2008 ACJ65418. 2007 ACJ72119. 2001 ACJ84320. 2008(1) Scale 727 21. JT-2003(2) SC595= 2003 ACJ61122. 2010 ACJ16523. 2012 ACJ128424. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 25. 2008 ACJ288526. 2000 ACJ31927. 1996 ACJ1046(SC) 28. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 29. 2008-ACJ-1498 30. AIR2007SC197131. (2004)2 SCC-1 32. Appeal (Civil) C.C.No.10993 of 2009 33. 2010 (5) ALT10534. 2005 (4) ACJ72135. AIR2011SC1234= 2011 (2) SCJ63936. (2013)11 SCC-3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.NO.1505 OF201221-01-2014 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by its General Manager, VIP Road, CBM Compound, Visakhapatnam. ...APPELLANT Gandam Somulamma & 6 others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for Appellant: Sri T.Mahender Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : M/s Rama Pallapothu HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1.2008 (1) LS-SC-177 2.1965 (1) All. E.R-563 3.1963 (2) All.E.R-432 4.1969 (1) All.E.R-555 5.1995 ACJ366(SC) 6.2013 ACJ1403= (4) ALT35(SC) 7.2009 ACJ12988.2003 ACJ129.2011 (8) Scale 240 10.2006 ACJ139811.2003 (9) SCC60612.AIR2009SC20813.2004 (3) SCC297- 2004-ACJ-1 14.2006 (4) SCC25015.2004 (13) SCC224= 2004-SAR (Civil) 290 16.2007 (10) SCC650= 2007 (4) Scale 292 17.2008 (1) LS-SC-177 18.1997 (7) SCC-558 19.2007 (13) SCC24620.2008 (1) Scale 531 21.2008 (1) Scale 727 22.2008 ACJ65423.JT-2003 (2) SC-595 =2003-ACJ-611=2003-ACT-611(SC) 24.2008-ACJ-1498 25.AIR2007SC197126. Appeal (Civil) C.C. No.10993 of 2009 27.2010 (5) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-21-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.2386 of 2012 AND BATCH2102-2014 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.....Appellant Smt.Nagidi Sugunamma and 3 others .... Respondents #The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.....Appellant $Sri Nalla Nagamani and 4 others... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Ravishankar Jandhyala Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K.Govind : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR2009SC208(2008)12SCC7012. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 3. (2006) 4 SCC2504. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 5. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 6. 2008(1)LS-SC-177 7. (1997)7 SCC-558 8. (2007)13 SCC2469. 2008(1) Scale 531 10. 2008(1) Scale 727 11. 2008 ACJ65412. JT-2003(2)SC-595=2003-ACJ-611=2003-ACT-611(SC) 13. 2008-ACJ-1498 14. AIR2007SC197115. Appeal (Civil) C.C.No.10993 of 2009 16. 2010 (5) ALT10517. 2005 (4) ACJ72118. AIR2011SC1234= 2011 (2) SCJ63919. (2013)7 SCC6220. 1965(1) A11. E.R-563 21. 1963(2) All.E.R-432 22. 1969(1)A11.E.R -555 23. 1995 ACJ366SC) 24. 2013 ACJ1403(4)ALT-35(SC)....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad Lucknow
Decided on : Apr-17-2014
1. This petition is directed against the order dated 28.09.2013 passed by District Judge rejecting application for compassionate appointment. 2. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned counsel for respondents. 3. Petitioner claims appointment on the death of his father a Class-IV employee in the judgeship of Sitapur. Petitioner's mother had also moved an application before District Judge, Sitapur stating that her son Prakash Agarwal (present petitioner) may be given compassionate appointment as there is no other source of livelihood. 4. It appears that on above application, District Judge constituted a Committee which sought information vide order dated 25.09.2013 regarding financial status of employee. This information was to be furnished within a week. 5. Submission is that District Judge vide order dated 28.09.2013 rejected the petitioner's application without giving effective opportunity, consequently, order cannot be sustained...
Tag this Judgment!